ebbe Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 He's on wages and the legs not broken now is it?....he owes us...you gone soft ebbe...I went out with a girl fromSarajevo a few years ago...she told a tale of a pretty hard existance over there...maybe its changed now...who knows...thought you at least might understand he broke his leg playing for the club and he's back now fit and wanting to play. it's not his fault the 2 guys in his position are playing brilliant is it? Link to comment
Redstar Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 he broke his leg playing for the club and he's back now fit and wanting to play. it's not his fault the 2 guys in his position are playing brilliant is it? Agreed...he's played RB before...I'd like to he him start against the huns...I rate him Dude... Link to comment
ebbe Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 Agreed...he's played RB before...I'd like to he him start against the huns...I rate him Dude... good man. not sure if throwing him in at right back in his 1st game in nearly a year out of position marking naismith is a good idea? still a better prospect than clark though. time will tell. Link to comment
K-9 Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 I'm reckoning Chris Clark and 2-1 will be 150/1 If he starts, I'll be placing some dough on him to score. Anytime more than likely. 33/1 is a good price. MON CHRISSY!Get EE on Friday and use the Link to comment
Mouse Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 Pissed off with Collum as ref, the new Mike McCurry Also lunchtime kick off is a pain in the arse to cater for the armchair loyal minks. Hope we stuff them Link to comment
wilm1542 Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 It's got to be fate for Clark to score the winner with the amount of stick he's getting on here Link to comment
OddJob Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 Fuck the rules, this is Aberdeen v Rangers we're talking about. Willie Collum's last visit to Pittodrie; He was probably already lined up to officiate this match before the fixtures were out. A very inept ref who bottles the big games so why they felt the need to appoint him for this fixture is beyond me. Link to comment
K-9 Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 He was probably already lined up to officiate this match before the fixtures were out. A very inept ref who bottles the big games so why they felt the need to appoint him for this fixture is beyond me.To me in big games his attitude and manner (i.e throws cards in face and screams at players like kids) only makes niggly games far worse. This one could explode if gets heated. Link to comment
Foster14 Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 To me in big games his attitude and manner (i.e throws cards in face and screams at players like kids) only makes niggly games far worse. This one could explode if gets heated. To be honest, we always do better against them nowadays when the games begin to explode a bit. We can never manage it down at Ibrox, but we have managed to get under their skins a bit at Pittodrie over recent years which has put them in to positions whereby the referee pretty much has no choice but to take action. Link to comment
K-9 Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 To be honest, we always do better against them nowadays when the games begin to explode a bit. We can never manage it down at Ibrox, but we have managed to get under their skins a bit at Pittodrie over recent years which has put them in to positions whereby the referee pretty much has no choice but to take action.Certainly where a load up for it crowd comes into it but the lunchtime kick off blunts that a bit. An all action start like in Dunfermline match will get the crowd right up for it from start and that will most certainly help. A slow, cautious, defensive start will have crowd quieter Link to comment
wilm1542 Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 Anyone noticed that Rangers haven't lost an away game all season (domesticly) Link to comment
K-9 Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 Anyone noticed that Rangers haven't lost an away game all season (domesticly) Being unbeaten in league overall tends to suggest this!! Link to comment
Foster14 Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 Anyone noticed that Rangers haven't lost an away game all season (domesticly) Or conceded (if the comment I saw the other day was correct). Link to comment
OddJob Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 Anyone noticed that Rangers haven't lost an away game all season (domesticly) There's always a first time though Link to comment
wilm1542 Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 There's always a first time though Really hoping so!! Link to comment
deco_1985 Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 Or conceded (if the comment I saw the other day was correct). They've also not played at Pittodrie either This one is in the bag! COYR!! Link to comment
Dandyesque Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 Personally, I'd rather play Clark or McArdle at right back than alter the rest of the team - continuity is vital - and I think it's close to our best XI as is. I think Clark is a better option than McArdle as he can pass. Link to comment
Redstar Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 Personally, I'd rather play Clark or McArdle at right back than alter the rest of the team - continuity is vital - and I think it's close to our best XI as is. I think Clark is a better option than McArdle as he can watch the game pass him by. Sorted Link to comment
RAZOR Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 my team for the Huns: GK Gonzalez; RB Foster; CB Arnason; CB Mawene; LB ConsidineRM Pawlett; CM Ozzy; CM Fyvie; LM MilsomCF Fallon; ST; Chalili id personally give Chalili a chance and play him on the shoulder of the last defender, keep him poaching. if he gets bullied too much and is ineffective in the first half then swap for vernon, simple. hope broon disna pussy oot and play a 5 man midfield, lets get at the cunts and go for it.Injured. So you wouldnt start our top goal scorer but would start a lad who has yet to score a senoir goal in his career. Link to comment
RAZOR Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 Not sure how it'll play out against Der Hun, but a bit of pace in the final third was sorely missing on Sunday and could have made a difference. Would stick with Vernon and Fallon, with Magennis as the usual impact sub at some point.I would start Mackie or Magennis on the wing. Link to comment
ebbe Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 why the hell would anyone want mackie or clark near the team especially against the scum? Link to comment
Rossshepherd Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 I would start Mackie or Magennis on the wing.Mackie. Folk are slamming Clark too such a stupid extent.. I don't like him at all, but christ.. Can sitting on an internet forum constantly slagging one individual be classed as a life?The boy is an average player, I hope he starts on Saturday and shuts everyone up. Link to comment
Jazzer_Bett Posted October 24, 2011 Author Share Posted October 24, 2011 Personally, I'd rather play Clark or McArdle at right back than alter the rest of the team - continuity is vital - and I think it's close to our best XI as is. I think Clark is a better option than McArdle as he can pass. You are a man that sees sense Dandyesque. Anyone who wants to break up the Arnason Osbourne partnership just to avoid playing Clark needs their head checked. Link to comment
Tommy Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 You are a man that sees sense Dandyesque. Anyone who wants to break up the Arnason Osbourne partnership just to avoid playing Clark needs their head checked. Anyone who wants to include Clark needs their head examined. Link to comment
V for Vendetta Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 I can't see why people would want Mackie or Magennis on the wing nether can really play there. The magennis on the wing experiment particularly was DREADFUL. As a few have said continuity would be a help so i wouldn't change the CB or CM pairing in particular. No point suffling them about and creating bigger problems than you might solve. ie taking Considine out of CB to cover LB. Let considine stay in the middle, we need him there. For similar reason Osbourne shouldn't be moved to RB. I think at time in the last few weeks there has been an adjustment with the wide mids being asked to come a little bit inside and the full backs pushing on, rather than the wide mids looking to get beyond. I could be wrong, just something i've noticed. McArdle definately can't bomb on and overlap fyvie so he has to be a non starter for RB. Which to me leaves Clark for RB OR move Foster over and put Clark Robertson LB. Either is far from ideal really. Up front I think Fallon's hold up play is again needed. There might be a case to start Chalali to see if some pace next to Fallon helps but not totally convinced. Maybe Brown will use Mackie up front for that reason but personally I'd rather someone else given a shot or just stick with Vernon. Link to comment
ebbe Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 Mackie. Folk are slamming Clark too such a stupid extent.. I don't like him at all, but christ.. Can sitting on an internet forum constantly slagging one individual be classed as a life?The boy is an average player, I hope he starts on Saturday and shuts everyone up. you hope he starts do you? do you like seeing aberdeen get beat? mackie is worse than clark. Link to comment
fine-n-dandy Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 Personally, I'd rather play Clark or McArdle at right back than alter the rest of the team - continuity is vital - and I think it's close to our best XI as is. I think Clark is a better option than McArdle as he can pass.Aye Clark Robertson? Mackie. Folk are slamming Clark too such a stupid extent.. I don't like him at all, but christ.. Can sitting on an internet forum constantly slagging one individual be classed as a life?The boy is an average player, I hope he starts on Saturday and shuts everyone up. He's being slammed cos he's shite.He was shite when he left & hasn't gotten any better in his time away.Only thing he ever did was that one revenge halfing of Alan Hutton. Just cos Brown signed him (& gave him a 3 year bloody deal) doesn't automatically make him a great (or even good) player. I for one still remember how poor he actually was. He used to be ok going forward (when he had a little pace) but his final ball in was always terrible & he's now got no pace He's poor at passing & even worse at tackling & cannot shoot for shite, all his goals (5 or whatever) have been deflections, so please tell me what are his strengths? He is a shocking re-signing & a complete waste of a wage Link to comment
RAZOR Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 Just cos Brown signed him (& gave him a 3 year bloody deal) doesn't automatically make him a great (or even good) player. I for one still remember how poor he actually was. He used to be ok going forward (when he had a little pace) but his final ball in was always terrible & he's now got no pace He's poor at passing & even worse at tackling & cannot shoot for shite, all his goals (5 or whatever) have been deflections, so please tell me what are his strengths? He is a shocking re-signing & a complete waste of a wageAgree, i thought he was terrible first time around and couldnt wait to see the back of him. If its possible i think he may be worse this time around. Link to comment
RAZOR Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 Anyone who wants to break up the Arnason Osbourne partnership just to avoid playing Clark needs their head checked.Nothing wrong with dropping Arnason back, proved he can do a job at the back. Milsom or Fyvie are central midfielders after all nothing wrong with them coming into the middle.Its impossible to keep the team the same every week. Only partnership not worth distrupting is Vernon Fallon. Link to comment
fine-n-dandy Posted October 24, 2011 Share Posted October 24, 2011 Agree, i thought he was terrible first time around and couldnt wait to see the back of him. If its possible i think he may be worse this time around. He is for sure cos he's no pace now In a round about way I'm thankful he actually is worse cos it's helping to keep him out of the side. Brown will feel he needs to play him to justify his signing but if others are performing better then he cannot do this.Only suspensions & injuries will give him the odd game but I'd still say we MUST have better options than him to chose from?But then Brown is notorious for going with experience rather than youth, so we may be stuck with him Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now