Tord31 Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Jack and Considine oot for this one. Milsom, Naysmith, Jason Brown and Fallon all in full training and pressing to be included. Shows we have a strong squad at the moment. Robertson, Rae and Hughes all one booking away from a cup match suspension. Langfield Osbourne Anderson Reynolds Robertson Hughes Clark Rae Fraser Vernon McGinn subs: Rogers, Naysmith, Magennis, Hayes, Milsomstand by: Brown, Shaunnessey, Brown, Smith, McManus Prediction: 2-1 Dons, Vernon and Anderson Link to comment
fine-n-dandy Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 No way in Hell I'd give Clark a game.He done fuck all Yesterday.Drop Clark & start Hayes AND Fraser. I'd maybe even drop Robertson for Naismith also Link to comment
Liam Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 We will play the same team as saturday, maybe with the exception of Fraser. Dont mess about with a team thats been doing well, especially for a quarter final. Link to comment
caledonia Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 swap Clark with Hayes and i will be happy Link to comment
Tord31 Posted October 28, 2012 Author Share Posted October 28, 2012 Plenty time to change it in the coming weeks. Also, if anyone is instead of him its Osbourne and do something different at the back. Link to comment
sheepiekev Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Plenty time to change it in the coming weeks. Also, if anyone is instead of him its Osbourne and do something different at the back. Craig Brown tends to make one or two changes for the League Cup games though. Might see Magennis in at RB? Osborne into midfield? Naysmith might get a run at LB? Link to comment
Dynamo Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 ClangersOsborne Anderson Reynolds RobertsonHayes Rae Hughes FraserMcginn vernon Link to comment
King Street Loon Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 No way in Hell I'd give Clark a game.He done fuck all Yesterday.Drop Clark & start Hayes AND Fraser. I'd maybe even drop Robertson for Naismith also Who's this guy?Youth player or something?? Link to comment
Redmist1903 Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 No way can Hughes and Rae be expected to play 3 games a week. Drop one to the bench, put Ozzy in Midfield in their place, Megennis at right back. I'd be tempted to give Fraser a rest as well and start Hayes instead. I'd give Naysmith a run out as well. Clangers MagennisAndersonReynoldsNaysmith HayesHughesOsbourneClark/Milsom VernonMcGinn Subs:Rodgers, Robertson, Clark/Milsom, Fraser, Rae Link to comment
fine-n-dandy Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Who's this guy?Youth player or something?? Oh for fk sake I got a y & i mixed up. OH MY GOD!! Nothing compared to some of the player misspellings I witnessed on here in the past. Link to comment
RUL Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 There will defo be 3 or 4 changes I reckon! Link to comment
vanderark14 Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Swap Clark for Hayes and then give Clark a one way ticket to the moon. 4 Link to comment
THE GRIM SHEEPER Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Why do people keep putting Vernon in their starting team.The guy is so off form it's a jokeGive someone else a chance you silly old man, you don't have to play him cause he is on the highest wage (thief) 2 2 Link to comment
Ingolfsson Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Why do people keep putting Vernon in their starting team.The guy is so off form it's a jokeGive someone else a chance you silly old man, you don't have to play him cause he is on the highest wage (thief) Is he aye? Would have thought Anderson, Naysmith, Rae and Hughes would be on higher than Vernon. Also, do you know how much he is on? I'd still keep him in as there is no-one else unless Smith is given a start which I think is unlikely as Broon seems cautious about playing the boy. Link to comment
Tord31 Posted October 28, 2012 Author Share Posted October 28, 2012 Vernon had a good game on Saturday, aye he missed two chances but the team won. Link to comment
Rossshepherd Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 I'd drop him ana. He has had a smelly season so far. Can't keep playing him If hes nae producing.. Link to comment
fine-n-dandy Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Is he aye? Would have thought Anderson, Naysmith, Rae and Hughes would be on higher than Vernon. Also, do you know how much he is on? I'd still keep him in as there is no-one else unless Smith is given a start which I think is unlikely as Broon seems cautious about playing the boy. I think Hayes will be on more also & he's getting dropped for Clark FFS! Link to comment
K-9 Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 No way can Hughes and Rae be expected to play 3 games a week. Drop one to the bench, put Ozzy in Midfield in their place, Megennis at right back. I'd be tempted to give Fraser a rest as well and start Hayes instead. I'd give Naysmith a run out as well. Clangers MagennisAndersonReynoldsNaysmith HayesHughesOsbourneClark/Milsom VernonMcGinn Subs:Rodgers, Robertson, Clark/Milsom, Fraser, RaeWhy not - they are professional footballers? Anderson on other hand has to ice his knee after every game and would maybe have sat this one out if Considine had been fit. 1 1 Link to comment
ChutneyLove Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 Subbies - dmcmanus I think that team would win with some spare in the tank. I would prefer to see the young loon in goals instead of the traffic cone, but know that's never going to happen. Josh and Vernon sittiong there like coiled springs (?!) ready to come on if neeed be. Link to comment
ollie1903 Posted October 28, 2012 Share Posted October 28, 2012 I think that team would win with some spare in the tank. I would prefer to see the young loon in goals instead of the traffic cone, but know that's never going to happen. Josh and Vernon sittiong there like coiled springs (?!) ready to come on if neeed be.I didna really survey the midfield options for the bench but I plain flat out refuse to have Chris Clark anywhere near the squad. Just a waste of a jersey and how he started that game on Saturday after his woeful attempt at "footballing" last week at Tannadice only Craig Brown can answer. Hopefully his substitution on Saturday is an indication that we've maybe saw the last of him.Punt him on loan to Peterheid in January. Link to comment
ChutneyLove Posted October 29, 2012 Share Posted October 29, 2012 I didna really survey the midfield options for the bench but I plain flat out refuse to have Chris Clark anywhere near the squad. Just a waste of a jersey and how he started that game on Saturday after his woeful attempt at "footballing" last week at Tannadice only Craig Brown can answer. Hopefully his substitution on Saturday is an indication that we've maybe saw the last of him.Punt him on loan to Peterheid in January.The midfield options are there. If someone gets injured / needs to come off. Isaac up to midfield, Josh in at the back; or McGinn dropping back, Vernon on. The attractiveness of that squad was all about the exclusion of Chris Clark. A local loon who has given his all - but we've been stung holding on to those types before. I'm a local loon and would give my all - doesn't merit me a starting place for The Dandies though. Link to comment
Redmist1903 Posted October 29, 2012 Share Posted October 29, 2012 Why not - they are professional footballers? Anderson on other hand has to ice his knee after every game and would maybe have sat this one out if Considine had been fit. In any game I've been to this season I've thought Rae looks leggy and one paced, like he's running through treacle at times. I thought he was laboured on Saturday. Some folk have also noticed this and have commented that his legs are gone. For that reason I think three games a week is too much for him. I thought Hughes put in a power of work on Saturday and was really impressive but with his ability to pick up strains and niggles I also think him playing at 100% capacity for 3 games in a week is a bit of an ask. I agree with you re-Anderson and would have had Considine on in his place against St Mirren but since Considine is injured I didn't think it was a observation worth making. Link to comment
ollie1903 Posted October 29, 2012 Share Posted October 29, 2012 In any game I've been to this season I've thought Rae looks leggy and one paced, like he's running through treacle at times. I thought he was laboured on Saturday. Some folk have also noticed this and have commented that his legs are gone. For that reason I think three games a week is too much for him. I thought Hughes put in a power of work on Saturday and was really impressive but with his ability to pick up strains and niggles I also think him playing at 100% capacity for 3 games in a week is a bit of an ask. I agree with you re-Anderson and would have had Considine on in his place against St Mirren but since Considine is injured I didn't think it was a observation worth making.Rae's contribution can not be underestimated. He's been integral to us getting to where we're at right now. 10 Link to comment
strachanmcgheegoal Posted October 29, 2012 Share Posted October 29, 2012 Stick with the team that's winning. Anyone desperate to offload vernon might want to take a look at Higdon's highlights from Friday. Different type of player granted but even still. Link to comment
Redmist1903 Posted October 29, 2012 Share Posted October 29, 2012 Rae's contribution can not be underestimated. He's been integral to us getting to where we're at right now. How has me saying that anytime I have seen Rae this season he has looked leggy and one paced underestimating his contribution? I appreciate he has played his part in getting us where we currently are, that doesn't mean he hasn't looked leggy and one paced any time I've watched him this season. Link to comment
vanderark14 Posted October 29, 2012 Share Posted October 29, 2012 Will St Mirren come up here and try and have go? heard a few pundits on Sport sound claiming that they try to play a passing game instead of sitting deep and punting it. Link to comment
Tord31 Posted October 29, 2012 Author Share Posted October 29, 2012 Will St Mirren come up here and try and have go? heard a few pundits on Sport sound claiming that they try to play a passing game instead of sitting deep and punting it. Would normally have said yes they would take the game to Aberdeen but wondering if a couple of bad defeats will mean they change their game. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now