terenceandphilip Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 about time too. I love the Tories sometimes. Labour would be increasing their benefits and saying 'oooh what a shame' http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-24327470 shame its a bbc link as there's no user comments. They only allow comments on boring stories and then completely over-moderate it anyway. I got a comment removed on an independence article for saying Aberdeen never got any money spent on it compared to Edinburgh and Glasgow. I complained and got told it wasn't relevant. WTF? Apart from it certainly IS relevant, who are they to be hovvering over user comments with an over zealous 'delete' button? Link to comment
BrianFaePerth Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 Hope your back is up to it Buck Link to comment
daytripping Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 Should have happened a long time ago, same goes for prisoners, get them in a chain gang cleaning up roadsides. I would make it kick in before 2 years, 6 Months is enough. Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 At least it'll keep harcus off here during the day Link to comment
K-9 Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 about time too. I love the Tories sometimes. Labour would be increasing their benefits and saying 'oooh what a shame' http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-24327470 shame its a bbc link as there's no user comments. They only allow comments on boring stories and then completely over-moderate it anyway. I got a comment removed on an independence article for saying Aberdeen never got any money spent on it compared to Edinburgh and Glasgow. I complained and got told it wasn't relevant. WTF? Apart from it certainly IS relevant, who are they to be hovvering over user comments with an over zealous 'delete' button?Daily Mail does!! http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2438020/George-Osbornes-work-dole-plan-Pick-litter-clean-graffiti-cook-elderly-welfare-benefits.html Link to comment
tup Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 Minijc will be as fit as a butcher's dog. Link to comment
fatjim Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 They should increase fines for littering or even force people to clean up litter if they are caught littering. Make money from cunts who think it is acceptable to drop litter. They can get a fine and clean it up. That fine could go to paying benefits. Link to comment
madjockmcferson Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 So, you are all happy about forced labor and street cleaners being made redundant? Link to comment
terenceandphilip Posted September 30, 2013 Author Share Posted September 30, 2013 So, you are all happy about forced labor ? in this case, yes. Very. Link to comment
Henry Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 So, you are all happy about forced labor and street cleaners being made redundant? I'm not happy about your Americanised spelling of labour. Link to comment
madjockmcferson Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 I have an auto-spell check. Live with it. Benefits are earned benefits that you paid into whilst working. You delayed consumption of that money in case you needed it in the event of becoming unemployed. You earned them and should not have to work for them. Link to comment
Dynamo Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 So, you are all happy about forced labor and street cleaners being made redundant? 'forced labour'.....or 'earning your benefits'....can be spun either way. Link to comment
terenceandphilip Posted September 30, 2013 Author Share Posted September 30, 2013 I have an auto-spell check. Live with it. Benefits are earned benefits that you paid into whilst working. You delayed consumption of that money in case you needed it in the event of becoming unemployed. You earned them and should not have to work for them. and the can't work, won't work? Link to comment
newcastlered Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 Something has to end this something for nothing culture whether it's this or not it has to end. Link to comment
tup Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 Could just kill the long term unemployed. War on fecklessness, surefire vote winner. Link to comment
ericblack4boss Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 I think they should be made to cut gorse, or pull ragwort doing either of those jobs would t be far more beneficial. Link to comment
daytripping Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 So, you are all happy about forced labor and street cleaners being made redundant? Yeah, why not. They should also do working folks gardens, that would be cool. Link to comment
Jonty Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 So, you are all happy about forced labor and street cleaners being made redundant? Forced Labour? You only have to do it if you are taking money off the state, nobody is forcing you to go and collect your giro. Link to comment
tup Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 Could make them wash folks cars at the traffic lights in winter when the car gets dirty all the time. Link to comment
AndrewW Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 I have an auto-spell check. Live with it. Benefits are earned benefits that you paid into whilst working. You delayed consumption of that money in case you needed it in the event of becoming unemployed. You earned them and should not have to work for them. Then scrap benefits and cut taxes! Solves all problems. Link to comment
Foster14 Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 I have an auto-spell check. Live with it. Benefits are earned benefits that you paid into whilst working. You delayed consumption of that money in case you needed it in the event of becoming unemployed. You earned them and should not have to work for them. What are you on about min? This is going to be able-to-work, but long out of work people. They will be getting a benefit called Job Seekers Allowance, and the main criteria to be eligible for this, is that you should be actively looking for a job. If you are in such a boat, and you are long time unemployed, you should be jumping at the chance to get some form of work placement to enhance skills and show employability. If you look beyond the headlines there are 3 options anyway: "To still qualify for jobseeker's allowance they will have three options - work placements, such as cleaning up litter; daily visits to a job centre; or taking part in compulsory training, for example, to improve their literacy." The nature of the people this is aimed at would clearly be the Spud's of the world, those who do the bare minimum to qualify for the benefits in question but really have no appetite to get in to work. If you're unwilling to take on compulsory training (which comes at a price to someone and it won't be them), then you should be forced to do something to earn the benefit. Link to comment
Henry Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 Could make them wash folks cars at the traffic lights in winter when the car gets dirty all the time. That's all very well, but what about places that don't have traffic lights? Link to comment
madjockmcferson Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 Less than 1% of benefit claimants have never worked. Most benefit claimants are short term unemployed who have earned those benefits through paying taxes. This is a sledgehammer to crack a nut that doesn't exist. Link to comment
Jonty Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 Less than 1% of benefit claimants have never worked. Most benefit claimants are short term unemployed who have earned those benefits through paying taxes. This is a sledgehammer to crack a nut that doesn't exist. It probably wont save any money, and may up even actually costing money to enforce and police. The message it sends to lazy f4ckers is where the value in the policy lies, you don't get benefit anymore if you're capable of working but choose not to. Where's the problem there? Link to comment
daytripping Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 Less than 1% of benefit claimants have never worked. Most benefit claimants are short term unemployed who have earned those benefits through paying taxes. This is a sledgehammer to crack a nut that doesn't exist. Did you read the details? It doesn't kick in till you've been out of work for 2 years. Link to comment
BrianFaePerth Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 Less than 1% of benefit claimants have never worked. Most benefit claimants are short term unemployed who have earned those benefits through paying taxes. This is a sledgehammer to crack a nut that doesn't exist. People like Buck need dealt with. Link to comment
Foster14 Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 Less than 1% of benefit claimants have never worked. Most benefit claimants are short term unemployed who have earned those benefits through paying taxes. This is a sledgehammer to crack a nut that doesn't exist. As dayts has already intimated, might be worthwhile reading up on something before you criticise it. These are long term-unemployed, the people it seem are unemployable due to not having sufficient skills or job shortages in the area. If someone takes umbrage with being made to take compulsory training or being involved in work placements after such a period of unemployment, I'd query their true motivation in finding employment. Link to comment
madjockmcferson Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 There is little or no evidence that suggests forcing people into work is beneficial. They are often forced into jobs that are low paying (so they remain on benefits) or they are forced into working instead of doing something that will benefit them (and society) long term. Excuse my skepticism but this 'job training' will amount to little more than low paid, low quality undependable jobs. One of the best way to get people into good jobs and to improve themselves is to support them and get them educated and all this system will do is to prevent people from improving themselves by forcing them to take a shitty, low paid, low skills, undependable job. Link to comment
Clagnuts Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 There is little or no evidence that suggests forcing people into work is beneficial. They are often forced into jobs that are low paying (so they remain on benefits) or they are forced into working instead of doing something that will benefit them (and society) long term. Excuse my skepticism but this 'job training' will amount to little more than low paid, low quality undependable jobs. One of the best way to get people into good jobs and to improve themselves is to support them and get them educated and all this system will do is to prevent people from improving themselves by forcing them to take a shitty, low paid, low skills, undependable job. I take it you're not working at the moment? Link to comment
tup Posted September 30, 2013 Share Posted September 30, 2013 With a name like Mad Jock McPherson it's no surprise you are struggling for work. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now