Jump to content

Cnd Campaign For Nuclear Disarmament


The Boofon

Recommended Posts

Well that's the referendum fucked but the one thing I am most passionate about is getting Trident to fuck out of our lives.

 

Regardless of staying in the UK or being independent the complete and utter waste of money that is going to be spent on a replacement for a Trident is abhorrent.

 

Fuck replacing Trident.

 

No nuclear weapons or weapons of mass destruction should be on the planet.

 

Ban the Bomb.

 

http://www.banthebomb.org

 

 

http://www.cnduk.org

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment

Seen as we're part of the United Kingdom, we're a target. Whether Trident being here makes us more of a target or not I'm not sure, but they have to be somewhere, and I'm sure as fuck nowhere else in the nation wants them.

You've missed the point by a fucking mile. They don't have to be anywhere. Get fucking rid of them.

 

We're no bigger a target or smaller a target whether they exist or not.

 

If only America had nuclear weapons before 9/11 eh?

 

Having nuclear weapons is a disgrace. We get all up in arms when Syria start gassing people but we wouldn't think twice of vapourising them? How does that work?

Link to comment
  • Site Sponsor

Well that's the referendum fucked but the one thing I am most passionate about is getting Trident to fuck out of our lives.

 

Regardless of staying in the UK or being independent the complete and utter waste of money that is going to be spent on a replacement for a Trident is abhorrent.

 

Fuck replacing Trident.

 

No nuclear weapons or weapons of mass destruction should be on the planet.

 

Ban the Bomb.

 

http://www.banthebomb.org

 

 

http://www.cnduk.org

Trident is going nowhere.

Link to comment

We're happy to have Nuclear Weapons to deter other Nuclear attacks, but quick to tell America to change their gun laws. Same fucking thing, they have guns because they think that they need to protect themselves from others with guns!

 

The key to protecting yourself from Nuclear is to not have the fucking thing outside your front door.

Almost. The key to protection is for nuclear weapons to not exist.

 

Nobody is going to use them despite all the posture. The only way they'll be used is if some crackpot manages to get them. If they don't exist the crackpot cannot get them.

 

No nukes. The way ahead.

Link to comment

You've missed the point by a fucking mile. They don't have to be anywhere. Get fucking rid of them.

 

We're no bigger a target or smaller a target whether they exist or not.

 

If only America had nuclear weapons before 9/11 eh?

 

Having nuclear weapons is a disgrace. We get all up in arms when Syria start gassing people but we wouldn't think twice of vapourising them? How does that work?

Ideally, yes. I'd love for there to be no nuclear weapons, but that would entail none of the world having them and who's going to enforce that I have no clue.

 

Do I want nuclear weapons? Fuck no! But I sure as hell wouldn't just bring my fists to a gunfight. I'm afraid (and by fuck I hate this phrase, and maybe I'm just lacking fight with last night's debacle) it's just the way the world is.

 

 

 

What the fuck have I become? :(

Link to comment

CND is a laudable group but irrelevant.

 

You don't get change from protest groups on core issues of government which having nukes is.

 

You get change when those policies are taken up by political parties and those political parties get clout.

 

That is what happened in Scotland. The next step was yesterday and Scotland fell and North Britain arose instead of it.

 

So Trident is here to stay, specifically in North Britain. Until it's replaced by Son of Trident, also in North Britain.

Link to comment

Ban the Bomb...No Nukes...it's not the 70's chief

 

:laughing: "back to the 70s" is exactly what I thought at first!

 

There was a CND display in glasgow recently, I only saw old men 60s-70s giving out leaflets.

 

The world would be better without nukes, but for as long as they exist we need a deterrent.

 

The MAD theory ensured the Cold War didn't boil over beyond regional proxy wars, its a success.

Link to comment

 

:laughing: "back to the 70s" is exactly what I thought at first!

 

There was a CND display in glasgow recently, I only saw old men 60s-70s giving out leaflets.

 

The world would be better without nukes, but for as long as they exist we need a deterrent.

 

The MAD theory ensured the Cold War didn't boil over beyond regional proxy wars, its a success.

I'm nae sure I'd agree. It works, but I wouldn't say that having something with such a magnitude of power is a success for anyone. I think "it succeeded as a deterrent in that conflict" is a more apt statement but there's a lot more to consider than just the outcome of the Cold War.

Link to comment

Well that's the referendum fucked but the one thing I am most passionate about is getting Trident to fuck out of our lives.

Regardless of staying in the UK or being independent the complete and utter waste of money that is going to be spent on a replacement for a Trident is abhorrent.

Fuck replacing Trident.

No nuclear weapons or weapons of mass destruction should be on the planet.

Ban the Bomb.

http://www.banthebomb.org

http://www.cnduk.org

I agree 100%.

Complete lunacy to waste billions on replacing something you know you cannot use. A nuclear war would just about end civilisation. Why even take the chance on having the weapons responsible. How can we lecture other nations that they shouldn't have them if we do ourselves. As for preventing another world war what about all the other countries that do not have them off the top of my head Switzerland, Nederlands, Norway, Canada and tons of others. They seem to be getting by just fine.

Snp said a yes vote and it was gone in 10 years. It should not be towed downstream but decommissioned and in the long run it will save money and make our country safer. Anyway that's me off my soapbox now.

Link to comment

Never said it shouldn't but it will be replaced because the guys with the votes will make it happen.

Maybe so but why should it be like that?

 

Scotland weren't a kick in the arse from being nuclear weapon free yesterday. The UK could do something similar and ensure a replacement for Trident is scrapped. We don't need them. That much is obvious. It's a money making scam.

Link to comment

Ideally, yes. I'd love for there to be no nuclear weapons, but that would entail none of the world having them and who's going to enforce that I have no clue.

 

Do I want nuclear weapons? Fuck no! But I sure as hell wouldn't just bring my fists to a gunfight. I'm afraid (and by fuck I hate this phrase, and maybe I'm just lacking fight with last night's debacle) it's just the way the world is.

 

 

 

What the fuck have I become? :(

A No voter by the sound of things.

Link to comment

A No voter by the sound of things.

Unfortunately I think we'll regress into being a lesser version of North England after this. I can't see us being given any substantial powers on top of what we have already and England are going to step up their game to give themselves more independent powers. I see a bleak future as it stands, voted for by us.

 

Yay for no!

Link to comment

Unfortunately I think we'll regress into being a lesser version of North England after this. I can't see us being given any substantial powers on top of what we have already and England are going to step up their game to give themselves more independent powers. I see a bleak future as it stands, voted for by us.

Yay for no!

The Scottish Government and Scottish MPs in Westminster should table a motion to scrap the Trident replacement.

 

That'd be a start.

Link to comment

Someone needs to sit me down and explain to me very slowly what the point of having nuclear weapons is because I've spent 25+ years trying to figure it out and the best explanation was that film where the computer goes mad and starts playing noughts and crosses with itself.

 

It does not compute! Whoever can explain where I am missing the point here might want to convince me of the existence of a god while they are at it.

Link to comment

Someone needs to sit me down and explain to me very slowly what the point of having nuclear weapons is because I've spent 25+ years trying to figure it out and the best explanation was that film where the computer goes mad and starts playing noughts and crosses with itself.

 

It does not compute! Whoever can explain where I am missing the point here might want to convince me of the existence of a god while they are at it.

 

 

Mutual Assured Destruction, or MAD. The M.A.D. Doctrine is based on the assumption that if both sides have the capability to annihilate the other, neither will act.

 

http://youtu.be/pFhgtpyei5Y

Link to comment

Had a debate with two Lib Dem No campaigners a few weeks back, asked them if there was any plans to get rid of Nuclear weapons after a No vote and did they think it was ok to position them not far from the biggest urban area in Scotland.

First guys response was "Are you going to tell America and France to do so as well"

Second Guy an old English cunt, Tried telling me about missiles that were stored in England before and its swings and roundabouts and that could you imagine the devastation that would be cost if there was to be an accident down at Portsmouth.

Link to comment

Had a debate with two Lib Dem No campaigners a few weeks back, asked them if there was any plans to get rid of Nuclear weapons after a No vote and did they think it was ok to position them not far from the biggest urban area in Scotland.

 

First guys response was "Are you going to tell America and France to do so as well"

 

Second Guy an old English cunt, Tried telling me about missiles that were stored in England before and its swings and roundabouts and that could you imagine the devastation that would be cost if there was to be an accident down at Portsmouth.

 

 

 

I don't understand how repositioning British nuclear assets is in any way answered by "Are you going to tell America and France to do so as well."

 

In my current state of mind I'd probably have battered the pair of them.

Link to comment

 

I don't understand how repositioning British nuclear assets is in any way answered by "Are you going to tell America and France to do so as well."

 

In my current state of mind I'd probably have battered the pair of them.

Was more a case for decommissioning Nuclear weapons, but you're right the pair of old fucks were clueless. He was quite proud when I told him they were in bed with the Tories.

Link to comment

Someone needs to sit me down and explain to me very slowly what the point of having nuclear weapons is because I've spent 25+ years trying to figure it out and the best explanation was that film where the computer goes mad and starts playing noughts and crosses with itself.

It does not compute! Whoever can explain where I am missing the point here might want to convince me of the existence of a god while they are at it.

As Kelt says it's purely posturing and both sides saying they've got.

 

However IF America, UK, France and all the other "good guys" (very fucking debatable) got rid of their nuclear weapons do you believe that Russia would say "fucking magic" and unload every nuke they have onto America?

 

Of course they wouldn't.

 

It's a pointless waste of money. Fuck we cannot even use Trident without the help of the Americans. What happens if they become the bad guys the enemy? :clangers2:

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...