Jump to content

Aberdeen V Dundee (1 - 0)


Recommended Posts

He was nae fouled. He fell over of his own accord.

 

I'm nae in any way makin excuses for Reynolds. He made a cunt of it positionally nd by putting his arm up.

But as far as straight reds go, that was as dodgy / debatable as you could hope to see.

A clear and blatant dive.

Agreed, but I still think it's a red. As soon as the hand goes on the shoulder it's a foul. It's one of those stupid situations where the rules and standard of refereeing in this country mean you have to go down. Blatant dive, but the foul was committed before he fell. He only fell to force the ref to make a decision.

 

Idiotic rule that could be done with being refined, nae that the ref's would apply it properly anyway. Cunts.

Link to comment

Same team again would do me fine. Considine in place of Reynolds obviously and Goodwillie to start again.

 

As necessary at it was, I was disappointed he was the one chosen to be replaced for Considine. He started the game really well and I am (still) convinced if given a run in the side he can prove his worth, he's one of the most technically gifted at the club.

Link to comment

Same team again would do me fine. Considine in place of Reynolds obviously and Goodwillie to start again.

 

As necessary at it was, I was disappointed he was the one chosen to be replaced for Considine. He started the game really well and I am (still) convinced if given a run in the side he can prove his worth, he's one of the most technically gifted at the club.

Yes.

His 3 or 4 touches needed to control a ball are testament to that.

Link to comment

Never a red for Reynolds, he never touched him....

Just watched it again, he had his hand on the boy Shalks shoulder and barely touched him, then the boy flips like a salmon. Fair enough a forward is always going to do that, but what pisses me off is the cunts reaction to Reynolds getting the red card, fist pumping and celebrating to the Ross County fans as if he'd just scored a goal? Get lost you little rat

Link to comment

Never a red for Reynolds, he never touched him....

 

 

After watching the highlights numerous times thats my opinion..The lad knew exactly what he was doing to get him sent off...

 

To say he never touched him is an idiotic statement.

 

 

It was a blatant dive, but if your hand is on someones shoulder, it's a foul.

Link to comment
  • Site Sponsor

Agreed, but I still think it's a red. As soon as the hand goes on the shoulder it's a foul. It's one of those stupid situations where the rules and standard of refereeing in this country mean you have to go down. Blatant dive, but the foul was committed before he fell. He only fell to force the ref to make a decision.

 

Idiotic rule that could be done with being refined, nae that the ref's would apply it properly anyway. Cunts.

They should kick Reynolds in the fud every time he raises his hands again. Diving cunt though.

Link to comment

They should kick Reynolds in the fud every time he raises his hands again. Diving cunt though.

Consi as well. I don't know if it's just our centre halfs, I'll have a look at others when I finally catch up with Sportscene, but they're both really bad at hauling at attackers.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...