Uefa Top 100 Club

[Guest RosemountRed]

Does anyone know what AFC mean by a UEFA top 100 club?

 

Is this based on revenue, average attendance, coefficient or what?

 

The AberDNA thing states:

 

"As we seek to build on the progress made in the past five years and move towards being a UEFA Top 100 Club in time for the move to the new stadium, it is vital that we continue to compete at the top end of the table and qualify for Europe each season."

 

Our average attendance this season is 15,400 (possibly top 100?)

Our revenue is roughly £14m (possibly top 100?)

Our coefficient is down at about 240th is Europe (nowhere near top 100)

[Guest milne_afc]

"Our average attendance this season is 15,400 (possibly top 100?)"

[Tord31]

they mean the coefficient

 

top 100 club probably as a half rule of thumb is gonna mean in europa group stages 2 or 3 times out of 5

[Guest RosemountRed]

they mean the coefficient

 

top 100 club probably as a half rule of thumb is gonna mean in europa group stages 2 or 3 times out of 5

 

Once would be fantastic.

[BWG]

Co-efficient.

 

Only top 100 we're getting into under McHunnis is the top 100 bottlers.

[Dal Riata Don]

Maybe we've posted 100 times on UEFA's website and have gotten access to their VIP 100 club.

 

Something like that.

[Guest milne_afc]

There is no UEFA 100. Sometimes the Dons claims will be false.

[Ernie McCracken]

There is no UEFA 100. Sometimes the Dons claims will be false.

?

[1983]

There is no UEFA 100. Sometimes the Dons claims will be false.

GET. THEIR. ATTENTION!

[Betty Swallicks]

Yup!

Just some more made up shite to con folk into thinking we need to build a new stadium at Kingsford asap.

also see: games in weeg, safety certificates etc.

[RUL]

We're ranked 236 at the moment...I assume the theory is better stadium will lead to bigger crowds therefore more money and better players....as they aren't going to move us up unless we win more European games as this is what UEFA appear to measure the rankings on.

 

https://www.uefa.com/memberassociations/uefarankings/club/index.html

[Clydeside_Sheep]

I think between the EPL, La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, there are 98 teams.

 

This doesnt include dutch, belgian or english championship sides.

 

I humbly suggest its very wishful thinking that we could be a top 100 side by any metric, at this point in time.

[Clydeside_Sheep]

 

Once would be fantastic.

 

Indeed, walk before you can run and all that!

[Donnet]

I think between the EPL, La Liga, Bundesliga, Ligue 1 and Serie A, there are 98 teams.

 

This doesnt include dutch, belgian or english championship sides.

 

I humbly suggest its very wishful thinking that we could be a top 100 side by any metric, at this point in time.

 

Hibs have had more total home attendances this season than half of La Liga, Serie A and Lique 1.

[Pash]

We're ranked 236 at the moment...I assume the theory is better stadium will lead to bigger crowds therefore more money and better players....as they aren't going to move us up unless we win more European games as this is what UEFA appear to measure the rankings on.

 

https://www.uefa.com/memberassociations/uefarankings/club/index.html

 

Wigan are ranked 90th.

 

I am not taking that list seriously.

[minijc]

 

Hibs have had more total home attendances this season than half of La Liga, Serie A and Lique 1.

Fuck Hibs

[The Boofon]

Fuck Hibs

+1

[Andy_123]

We're ranked 236 at the moment...I assume the theory is better stadium will lead to bigger crowds therefore more money and better players....as they aren't going to move us up unless we win more European games as this is what UEFA appear to measure the rankings on.

 

https://www.uefa.com/memberassociations/uefarankings/club/index.html

 

Why are there teams with a higher coefficient ranked lower than teams with a lower coefficient?

 

We're sitting there in 236th on 4.000 total points from the last 5 seasons. Zawisza Bydgoszcz are sitting in 235 with 0.500 points.

[Donnet]

 

Why are there teams with a higher coefficient ranked lower than teams with a lower coefficient?

 

We're sitting there in 236th on 4.000 total points from the last 5 seasons. Zawisza Bydgoszcz are sitting in 235 with 0.500 points.

 

Because it's in order of effective club coefficient and your club coefficient cannot be less than 20% of the clubs association coefficient. Without their nations contribution they would be on 0.500 but since they are in Poland they take 20% of Poland's coefficient which is 4.025 - larger than Aberdeen's 4.000

[Bamber]

Coefficient calculation
Clubs' coefficients are determined EITHER the sum of all points won in the previous five years OR the association coefficient over the same period, WHICHEVER IS THE HIGHER (under a new system introduced for 2018/19 onwards).

if the new scoring system (2 pts for 3rd round exit) rather than the old system (1pt) we would be some where around 140th with 8pts

 

Hibs (old 1.0 new 3.725) Rangers (old 0.25 new 3.725) and motherwell (old 1.5 new 3.725) all gain

[aberdeen1970]

 

Because it's in order of effective club coefficient and your club coefficient cannot be less than 20% of the clubs association coefficient. Without their nations contribution they would be on 0.500 but since they are in Poland they take 20% of Poland's coefficient which is 4.025 - larger than Aberdeen's 4.000

Which is the fatal flaw in the whole system. A bogus list to protect clubs from big countries.

 

There should be no place for country points in a club ranking system.

[RUL]

True but does make our aims of being a top 100 club seem slightly more realistic.

[Sonoftherock]

Does anyone know what AFC mean by a UEFA top 100 club?

 

Is this based on revenue, average attendance, coefficient or what?

 

The AberDNA thing states:

 

"As we seek to build on the progress made in the past five years and move towards being a UEFA Top 100 Club in time for the move to the new stadium, it is vital that we continue to compete at the top end of the table and qualify for Europe each season."

 

Our average attendance this season is 15,400 (possibly top 100?)

Our revenue is roughly £14m (possibly top 100?)

Our coefficient is down at about 240th is Europe (nowhere near top 100)

 

Not sure how it all works exactly, but since appointing Gerrard, Rangers have now risen to No. 1 in the list.

[Guest milne_afc]

Caught a glimpse of a club pamphlet today and one of the criteria was a minimum of £20m/year turnover. There was other stuff mentioned but I couldn't be arsed reading it.

 

Ambitious.