Jump to content

Hampden V Murrayfield Cast Your Vote


Recommended Posts

Hampden is shite, but if games were moved around plenty folk would start moaning about bias etc etc. Apart fae finding £100M+ to build a new stadium in a more neutral location and millions more to spend on transport infrastructure they are fucked. 

 

Murrayfield is shite to for fitba games. 

 

 

Accept Hampden is shit and try and get money to redevelop it. Or sell the site in 20 years, also get more funding and build a new stadium elsewhere then. 

 

Scotland is full of no voting cunts so it's fitting our national stadium is an embarrassment also. 

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment

Not really

 

Surely if the ex Celtic director paid money and the Scotland games went to parkhead then you would have an argument

It's the insinuation that to allow Scottish Football to find a good home anywhere other than Glasgow is somehow unthinkable. Regardless of the benefits of such a move to the game and the rest of the nation.

 

And the brass knecked assumption we are all on board with the football starts and ends in Glasgow just because it always has kind of attitude.

 

Tradition once again being used as an excuse for a lack of ambition and open minded, forward thinking.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment

I'm also unclear why we are paying an amateur football club a huge sum of money for a stadium the SFA have essentially built and maintained.

 

How the fuck did Queens Park earn that and what will they do with the money? How are they even constituted to safely deal with that sort of cash?

I come at the same arguement a different way. I wonder if Queens Park retain a pre-emptive sale clause?

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...