The Boofon Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 I'm not being racist here but you only need to look at Africa to see the moral differences between us and them, imo they're a few hundred years behind us in evolution, savages. Glad we cleared that up before you went further Dayts. Link to comment
Admin Bebo Posted August 17, 2011 Admin Share Posted August 17, 2011 Of course it could be that the white boroughs that did not riot have high degrees of literacy, employment and prospects as he has shown in his own graphs. Maybe he sould concentrate on that rather their colour. Hackney is 60%+ whiteCroydon is 60%+ whiteEinfield is 70%+ white Does the video footage of the riots in those areas match those demographics? Link to comment
Big Man Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 I'm not being racist here but you only need to look at Africa to see the moral differences between us and them, imo they're a few hundred years behind us in evolution, savages. You are 110% correct with this statement daytripping. Ive had this exact same conversation with many people now, and the overwhelming consensus is the statement you provided here. Its our fault for attempting to colonize them in the first place, they still want to run around half-clad hunting antelope with their spears, raping and killing each other. Its not their fault, their still far too in touch with their animal instincts. When you try and domesticate people like that and teach them a western way of life - introducing guns, cars, money, westernised democracy its just a recipie for disaster. The whole continent is f**ked up (largely because of us) and its going to take a few hundred years of evolution to sort it out - not politics. Savages is the word. Link to comment
Coopy100 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 Hackney is 60%+ whiteCroydon is 60%+ whiteEinfield is 70%+ white Does the video footage of the riots in those areas match those demographics?f**k knows but there was plenty of whites and asians involved but it could be that most of the unemployed, unemployable, bottom of the rung, poorly educated folk in these areas are black. Link to comment
Big Man Posted August 25, 2011 Share Posted August 25, 2011 This c@nt: Got 16 months for taking a lick of a stolen ice-cream: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2029920/UK-riots-Teenager-urged-Facebook-friends-kill-million-police-jailed.html :hysterical: :hysterical: I like are new type criminal justice system. Link to comment
Admin Bebo Posted August 25, 2011 Admin Share Posted August 25, 2011 This c@nt: Got 16 months for taking a lick of a stolen ice-cream: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2029920/UK-riots-Teenager-urged-Facebook-friends-kill-million-police-jailed.html :hysterical: :hysterical: I like are new type criminal justice system. I really don't like that the justice system is being influenced and pressured by politicians and the public into making these extreme sentences. While i identify myself as slightly left of centre, i do, however, think it's f*cking magic. Link to comment
Jocky Balboa Posted August 25, 2011 Share Posted August 25, 2011 f**k knows but there was plenty of whites and asians involved but it could be that most of the unemployed, unemployable, bottom of the rung, poorly educated folk in these areas are black. I was caught in the middle of it myself and there's no getting away from it, the majority of looters were ethnic minorities. This says a lot about lack of integration of certain cultures. After all, I don't see Eastern Europeans (despite the many complaints about their influx in numbers in recent years) causing a fraction of the trouble the Blacks and Muslims do. An inconvenient truth for some Liberals, but true nonetheless. Link to comment
Bobby Connor Posted August 26, 2011 Share Posted August 26, 2011 I really don't like that the justice system is being influenced and pressured by politicians and the public into making these extreme sentences. While i identify myself as slightly left of centre, i do, however, think it's f*cking magic. Same here min and also take a similar view. Get it right fucking round ye' is my objective viewpoint though. Utter fucks. Link to comment
E-P-K Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 See the government have now given the all clear to defend your home when minks break in, " reasonable force" being the key wording, so a swift blow to the head with a baseball bat is ok, but not stabbing them after you have knocked them out by baseball bat. Link to comment
Stoney Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 About time too, i also think any manslaughter that results from a single blow to the head should be thrown out as well, if they wernt in the house then they wouldnt get twatted on the head. simples. Some cunt tried to break into my folks place two weeks back (they caught him in the garden) but due to the fact he never got in the house they couldnt charge him with anything - absolute fucking jobbies. Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 im all for the big dunc home defence method. Link to comment
vanderark14 Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 im all for the big dunc home defence method. or LL Cool J http://edition.cnn.com/2012/08/23/showbiz/ll-cool-j-burgar/index.html Link to comment
BrianFaePerth Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 All very well in theory, but when it's Winston fae Brixton who is breaking in and gets his heid clubbed, there'll be the race angle and thon law will be worthless. 1 Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 or LL Cool J http://edition.cnn.com/2012/08/23/showbiz/ll-cool-j-burgar/index.html ladies love cool james. i love him after hearing that.he is da man. Link to comment
BrianFaePerth Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 ladies love cool james. i love him after hearing that.he is da man. which makes you a lady 1 Link to comment
Site Sponsor Dom Sullivan Posted October 9, 2012 Site Sponsor Share Posted October 9, 2012 All very well in theory, but when it's Winston fae Brixton who is breaking in and gets his heid clubbed, there'll be the race angle and thon law will be worthless.You are absolutely spot on there my Dundonian friend. One law for them and a different even for a body else Link to comment
Tommy Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 All very well in theory, but when it's Winston fae Brixton who is breaking in and gets his heid clubbed, there'll be the race angle and thon law will be worthless. If it's Winston fae Brixton he shoulnae be in my manor so he'd get smacked. Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 You are absolutely spot on there my Dundonian friend. One law for them and a different even for a body else thats racist. Link to comment
NorthernLights24 Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Jury has decided Mark Duggan was lawfully killed. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-25657949 Interesting to see if there is any trouble in the aftermath of this verdict. Link to comment
Ke1t Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Seems to have been a fair amount of police malfeasance around the guy's execution from what I'm reading. ACA indeed B. Link to comment
Jonty Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Seems to have been a fair amount of police malfeasance around the guy's execution from what I'm reading. ACA indeed B. Execution my arse. If I pulled a gun on the cops and got shot I'd be called a stupid cunt, This fool does it and suddenly he's executed cos he's black. Fuck him. Link to comment
Ke1t Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Execution my arse. If I pulled a gun on the cops and got shot I'd be called a stupid cunt, This fool does it and suddenly he's executed cos he's black. Fuck him. Each to their own, and if you think police executions are fair enough then fair enough. From what I read he didn't pull a gun on the cops at all, and in fact may even have been pinned down, just like the Brazilian lad on the tube, when he was executed. Some people see no problem with 'criminals' and 'suspected criminals' being executed, some of us do. Some people are of the mind that the authorities have the right to do whatever they want to whomever they want, and that's fair enough too. But, to my mind, if the police shoot someone to death when there's no apparent need to do so, that's an execution. Link to comment
caledonia Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Eight jurors said that they were sure that he did not have a gun in his hand when he was shot. Link to comment
The Cockney Don Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Now this one was dodgy , http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3974461.stm Link to comment
Dynamo Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 The pigs cock up here probably did some other cunt a favour. Link to comment
Ke1t Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Now this one was dodgy , http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3974461.stm No action taken against officers then either. Why am I not surprised? Ah, because a lad holding a table leg looks a lot like someone pointing a rifle at you. Link to comment
Jonty Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Each to their own, and if you think police executions are fair enough then fair enough. From what I read he didn't pull a gun on the cops at all, and in fact may even have been pinned down, just like the Brazilian lad on the tube, when he was executed. Some people see no problem with 'criminals' and 'suspected criminals' being executed, some of us do. Some people are of the mind that the authorities have the right to do whatever they want to whomever they want, and that's fair enough too. But, to my mind, if the police shoot someone to death when there's no apparent need to do so, that's an execution. He was lawfully killed according to the jury majority verdict, which was proved beyond reasonable doubt. So not executed. What do you think he collected a gun for, popping cans off a wall? Link to comment
Jonty Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 Eight jurors said that they were sure that he did not have a gun in his hand when he was shot. Clearly he chucked the gun as he exited the vehicle so as not to get caught with it, anybody that has ever been arrested with drugs in their pocket would tell you that. The police then thought he was pulling the gun on them so shot him. Stupid cunt. Link to comment
Ke1t Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 He was lawfully killed according to the jury majority verdict, which was proved beyond reasonable doubt. So not executed. What do you think he collected a gun for, popping cans off a wall? I don't think it's relevant that he had previously had a gun, owned a gun, disposed of a gun, or had wank-fantasies about guns. Plenty people own guns... but unless that gun is being pointed at someone then there's no reason to execute that person. But, again, he didn't even appear to have a gun when he was executed, let alone pointing one at the cops that would necessitate them executing him. He may have been legging it, he may have been pinned helplessly on the ground... like the Brazilian lad was when he was executed... but pointing a gun at the police he most certainly wasn't. Link to comment
zander Posted January 8, 2014 Share Posted January 8, 2014 He was up to no good, fuck him.Fly with the crows you get shot with the crows. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now