The Weekly Chat Accumulator 20/21

[G31DON]

I'm hearing that when dabbling in shares, you should buy low and sell high. Interesting hypothesis. 

[dazzy_deff]

Swansea Vs Blackburn 

Both teams to score Yes

4/6

[robbojunior]

Barnsley v Watford btts @ 5/6

[G31DON]

Next weeks team:

G31Don (2) - Hull 11/10
@ Studebaker-90 (1)
robbojunior (2) -
King Street Loon (1) - Watford 6/5
@ redforever86
dazzy_deff (2) - Swansea Vs Blackburn  btts Yes 4/6

Subs Bench

Durrant Dived (1)

Dynamo

Sooper Hanz (1)

thedandydon (1)

Maryhilldon

The Buzzard (5)

Don Fonte (4)

Henry (2)

Quagmire

[G31DON]

31 minutes ago, robbojunior said:

Barnsley v Watford btts @ 5/6

King street loon has already picked Watford.  Need something else

[G31DON]

Anyone know why my @ ing people is not working?

[The Cockney Don]

26 minutes ago, G31DON said:

Anyone know why my @ ing people is not working?

No space between @ and the name.

@G31DON .

[robbojunior]

57 minutes ago, G31DON said:

King street loon has already picked Watford.  Need something else

FFS!

Livingston v Motherwell btts

[thedandydon]

@Studebaker-90

@Redforever86

waiting on yer picks lads.

[G31DON]

47 minutes ago, The Cockney Don said:

No space between @ and the name.

@G31DON .

That's what I thought.  I tried that last time (no space) but it did not work.

[Redforever86]

Chelsea @1.50

[Studebaker-90]

I’ll sleep on it. A lot of pressure for me to get to 2. 

[The Cockney Don]

1 hour ago, G31DON said:

That's what I thought.  I tried that last time (no space) but it did not work.

Don't do the space between @and the name.

[G31DON]

G31Don (2) - Hull 11/10
Studebaker-90 (1)
robbojunior (2) - Livingston v Motherwell btts
King Street Loon (1) - Watford 6/5
redforever86 - Chelsea 1/2
dazzy_deff (2) - Swansea Vs Blackburn  btts Yes 4/6

 

See you in the morning Stud.

[Don Fonte]

1 hour ago, Studebaker-90 said:

I’ll sleep on it. A lot of pressure for me to get to 2. 

Shambles.

[Studebaker-90]

2 minutes ago, Don Fonte said:

Shambles.

Got to go with what’s hot

[Don Fonte]

42 minutes ago, Studebaker-90 said:

Got to go with what’s hot

Dayts' ex missus?

[Studebaker-90]

Nae seen her. Pics @daytripping

[G31DON]

Morning @Studebaker-90

[Studebaker-90]

Peterborough to beat Shrewsbury @ 3/5 

[G31DON]

Nice one Stude.  Lets hope for a Spooktacular win.

 

40/1 on William Hills

 

 

[Don Fonte]

On. Good luck the B team.

[Studebaker-90]

38/1 in B365. Good luck men. 

[The Buzzard]

All the best, chaps. 

[G31DON]

1 hour ago, rocket_scientist said:

Aye 30 or 40 to 1, you only need a couple of those per season to be in the black so best of luck.

I've seen a few btts picks on here. Obviously odds on because most games don't have a team scoring zero but has anyone actually pulled the data? What is the percentage of games?

One of my old gambling partners swears by btts but he's one of the luckiest punters ever. How can we possibly bet that both teams will score? I don't get that.

Worse is betting on first goal scorers or no. of corners etc. That's just mug punting and another reason the bookies always win. 

 

You don't need to tell us its 30 or 40 to 1.  I put the bet on at 40/1 and Studebaker has got 38/1.

[Studebaker-90]

1 hour ago, rocket_scientist said:

Aye 30 or 40 to 1, you only need a couple of those per season to be in the black so best of luck.

I've seen a few btts picks on here. Obviously odds on because most games don't have a team scoring zero but has anyone actually pulled the data? What is the percentage of games?

One of my old gambling partners swears by btts but he's one of the luckiest punters ever. How can we possibly bet that both teams will score? I don't get that.

Worse is betting on first goal scorers or no. of corners etc. That's just mug punting and another reason the bookies always win. 

Just a punt to make things more interesting RS. I doubt anyone is looking at a deeper analysis than that. 

[G31DON]

17 minutes ago, rocket_scientist said:

You misunderstand. Or you are choking for a fight. Either way, go fuck yourself.

? a measured response as always. 

 

Can you explain how bookies work again? 

[G31DON]

5 minutes ago, rocket_scientist said:

You ignored every point I made to make a smart arse response. Don't blame me for my reaction to your stupidity.

I made a smart reply, but it was stupid? ?

[G31DON]

1 hour ago, rocket_scientist said:

Aye 30 or 40 to 1, you only need a couple of those per season to be in the black so best of luck.

 

I've seen a few btts picks on here. Obviously odds on because most games don't have a team scoring zero but has anyone actually pulled the data? What is the percentage of games?

Depends on the league, english leagues running at 50% so far this season

One of my old gambling partners swears by btts but he's one of the luckiest punters ever. How can we possibly bet that both teams will score? I don't get that.

He wins a lot, and does btts- do you see the correlation?  pick teams that score often but let in goals - eg Hamilton this season 64% btts

Worse is betting on first goal scorers or no. of corners etc. That's just mug punting and another reason the bookies always win. 

No one is betting on this in this thread

Happy?

[G31DON]

43 minutes ago, rocket_scientist said:

This is why bookies win every year without exception.

The pro gambler - and @minijc can attest - will look for value and will try to beat the bookie.

30 or 40 to 1 shots are fish in a barrel shooting. Even 10/1 sixfolds is not what the smart gamblers do.

I posted about this earlier.

Football is a 3 horse race but without getting 2/1 for all three outcomes (or equivalently-stacked returns, which we NEVER do), the book is stacked in favour of the house, like 35/1 on roulette for 37 numbers.

?

Like shooting fish in a barrel

Of some task or activity, exceptionally easy to do or accomplish.

This hyperbolic expression alludes to the fact that fish make an easy target inside a barrel (as opposed to swimming freely in the sea). [Early 1900s]