Red Dragon Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 The whole Webster from Hearts to Wigan debacle has been concluded via the court of arbatration for sport with a compensation fee being set. Jambos throughout the land were expecting Link to comment
Guest LondonScottish Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 The whole Webster from Hearts to Wigan debacle has been concluded via the court of arbatration for sport with a compensation fee being set. Jambos throughout the land were expecting Link to comment
K-9 Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 Whilst admitting to having a bit of a laugh at Hearts expense in this case, this one sets a precident for players to easily walk away from their contracts and give clubs even less power, while players have even more power. Link to comment
Tord31 Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 Who is going to pay this money then? Anyone that wants him in the last two days of the transfer window or who? Even though I'm sure Andy has been taking in a good wage for four or five years now I'd be suprised if he can get anywhere near paying this off. Bad advice by agent me thinks. Link to comment
Milners Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 Who is going to pay this money then? Anyone that wants him in the last two days of the transfer window or who? Even though I'm sure Andy has been taking in a good wage for four or five years now I'd be suprised if he can get anywhere near paying this off. Bad advice by agent me thinks. I believe its Andy Webster that has to pay the cost which i'm sure rangers will cover him for. Killie fan put a good example of this: If Naismith had been able, and had done this to us - and all of a sudden we're receiving Link to comment
K-9 Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 The Panel found that Webster and Wigan are jointly and severally liable for the payment of such amount the last bit seems to suggest that both Webster and Wigan will pay 75k each. Link to comment
OneZanderDiamond Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 I still think 150k is too much. Chris Clark cost 200k and he's at least twice the player Webster is/was Link to comment
zig-a-zig-ah Posted January 30, 2008 Share Posted January 30, 2008 I still think 150k is too much. Chris Clark cost 200k and he's at least twice the player Webster is/was Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now