Gonzalez Signs

[Red Dragon]

Indeed.

 

Only negative thing about the deal is that we didn't take him for the year.

Out of respect to Langfield according to Brown.

 

Poor decision.

No room for sympathetic claptrap in this game.

What happens if he performs solidly, we get ourselves into a strong position by the turn of the year, then he has to go back to City?

What happens is we have a goalkeeper come in for the rest of the season with an even more dubious and shaky mentality than the one which proved a liability before.

Or we have to go out and get another keeper if Langfield can't continue at all.

 

Like I say. I think we have called this one badly.

The season lasts til May, not December.

 

Agree with you Mutton but reckon if we're doing well and he's doing well, we'll see the loan extended.

[Pudgie]

f**k me, a signing thats not being ripped to shreds. Surely we can find something wrong lads.

 

I'll start us off- he's got a sh*t hair cut

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

just having a laugh folks - do not take this serious

I should f**king hope so! I've got hair like that!

[ollie1903]

Thing is, whos to say Langfield will actually play again...its all very well docs saying he will be clear to play....its another thing altogether to get back on the field and put your heed where the boots are flyingI would think that there will be an option of extending Gonzalez's loan if things dont work out for Jamie

Clangers should have nae probs then

 

Wait and see, best keeper we've had at the club for a number of years.

Cheers for that, hairycrystalba's

 

I hope you're correct