Foster14 Posted July 21, 2011 Share Posted July 21, 2011 I see the death count at the Stockport hospital is now up to 5 from the saline contamination and they have arrested a 27 year old nurse on suspicion of murder. I wonder what the hell possesses someone to do this? I assume they thought they could get away with it through being unable to trace it. I think I will continue to give hospitals as a wide a berth as possible... Link to comment
tup Posted July 21, 2011 Share Posted July 21, 2011 I see the death count at the Stockport hospital is now up to 5 from the saline contamination and they have arrested a 27 year old nurse on suspicion of murder. I wonder what the hell possesses someone to do this? I assume they thought they could get away with it through being unable to trace it. I think I will continue to give hospitals as a wide a berth as possible... All women are nuts, I'd imagine there's a fair amount of them lacing their husband's tea with allsorts in an effort to kill him or undermine his health. Link to comment
Admin Bebo Posted July 21, 2011 Admin Share Posted July 21, 2011 All women are nuts, I'd imagine there's a fair amount of them lacing their husband's tea with allsorts in an effort to kill him or undermine his health. US department of health statistics show that women are more likely to abuse and mistreat children. But men are the ones that are seen as the aggressive ones and perpetrators of such maltreatment. Link to comment
Big Man Posted July 21, 2011 Share Posted July 21, 2011 I see the death count at the Stockport hospital is now up to 5 from the saline contamination and they have arrested a 27 year old nurse on suspicion of murder. I wonder what the hell possesses someone to do this? I assume they thought they could get away with it through being unable to trace it. I think I will continue to give hospitals as a wide a berth as possible... I can't claim to know the answer to that, but i know this: i'd definately sling one up her Link to comment
King Street Loon Posted July 21, 2011 Share Posted July 21, 2011 I can't claim to know the answer to that, but i know this: i'd definately sling one up her Why do lassies always do that stupid pout thing with the finger to the chin when posing for photos? I still would though. She better wear her nurses uniform though! Link to comment
tup Posted July 21, 2011 Share Posted July 21, 2011 Why do lassies always do that stupid pout thing with the finger to the chin when posing for photos? I still would though. She better wear her nurses uniform though! Getting licked oot by the top dog in the nick, as the other lags hold her down, will be her next sexual encounter I imagine. Link to comment
Big Man Posted July 21, 2011 Share Posted July 21, 2011 Why do lassies always do that stupid pout thing with the finger to the chin when posing for photos? I still would though. She better wear her nurses uniform though! Aye, just don't accept any ''fluids'' from her eh...:thumbs: Link to comment
tightbreeks Posted July 21, 2011 Share Posted July 21, 2011 she was systematically taking out the b*stard patients that pissed her off at work. all that ass wiping got too much. Link to comment
tup Posted July 21, 2011 Share Posted July 21, 2011 she was systematically taking out the b*stard patients that pissed her off at work. all that ass wiping got too much. Bit of euthanasia in revenge for them having soiled themselves on her watch? Could be. Link to comment
seanthesheep Posted July 21, 2011 Share Posted July 21, 2011 Bit of euthanasia in revenge for them having soiled themselves on her watch? Could be. Euthanasia - Is that not your annual trip to Bangkok TUP. Link to comment
360 Posted July 21, 2011 Share Posted July 21, 2011 Why do lassies always do that stupid pout thing with the finger to the chin when posing for photos? My understanding is that it means that they are fat, but this pose is a method that female blimps utilize in order to somewhat hide aforementioned fat. This can be used as a reference for what poses mean...http:// http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b92/brent1258/truthaboutMYSPACE.jpg Link to comment
Big Man Posted July 22, 2011 Share Posted July 22, 2011 The biatch has been charged, nae with murder but with theft and criminal damage with intent to danger life: http://www.bbc.co.uk...hester-14256332 Lucky prison guards locking that up every night... Link to comment
Big Man Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 Sexy bitch has been denied bail... ''For her own protection'' according to the judge. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-14422797 Link to comment
Monkey Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 One posed photo does not a looker make though, even if she does own a nurses uniform... Link to comment
The Boofon Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 One posed photo does not a looker make though, even if she does own a nurses uniform... A cross between Orville the duck and Ken Dodd in that last picture. Set of teeth like a caveman's necklace. I'd still rattle her though. Link to comment
Big Man Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 One posed photo does not a looker make though, even if she does own a nurses uniform... Ooft! Thank you for bringing these to my attention. I still would though if im honest - despite that trainwreck of a moo on her... Link to comment
Ke1t Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 She's got one, giant middle tooth.... how does that work? Isn't two, symmetric incisors the norm at the front, rather than what she has... which appears to be more along the line of 'Cartoon Baby' Link to comment
Jocky Balboa Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 Is it just me, or is it worrying that her details have been plastered all over the media, before the trial's even been started? Hardly conducive to anything other than a trial by media and/or lynchmobs. I don't hear people upholding the old "innocent until proven guilty" mantra. Sad, that. Link to comment
Big Man Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 Is it just me, or is it worrying that her details have been plastered all over the media, before the trial's even been started? Hardly conducive to anything other than a trial by media and/or lynchmobs. I don't hear people upholding the old "innocent until proven guilty" mantra. Sad, that. How do you mean her details jocky? Link to comment
Monkey Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Is it just me, or is it worrying that her details have been plastered all over the media, before the trial's even been started? Hardly conducive to anything other than a trial by media and/or lynchmobs. I don't hear people upholding the old "innocent until proven guilty" mantra. Sad, that. Just noticed that all charges against her were dropped last week and she was released from prison. Did anyone else realise this? Have I been so busy at work that I have missed the pages and pages in the media reporting her release and issuing retractions? Thought not. Link to comment
Big Man Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Just noticed that all charges against her were dropped last week and she was released from prison. Did anyone else realise this? Have I been so busy at work that I have missed the pages and pages in the media reporting her release and issuing retractions? Thought not. I picked up on the story last week, but couldn't be arsed to track down the thread. Her solicitor released a statement saying she was considering sueing for wrongful arrest and that she was considering actions against several national newspapers. Link to comment
StandFree1982 Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 I picked up on the story last week, but couldn't be arsed to track down the thread. Her solicitor released a statement saying she was considering sueing for wrongful arrest and that she was considering actions against several national newspapers.If she is innocent then she has a very good reason to sue them. Newspapers shouldn't be allowed to show pictures and names of "potential" criminals until they have been proven guilty. Especially when it comes to something as serious as this, or rape (adult or child). Link to comment
Jocky Balboa Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 If she is innocent then she has a very good reason to sue them. Newspapers shouldn't be allowed to show pictures and names of "potential" criminals until they have been proven guilty. Especially when it comes to something as serious as this, or rape (adult or child). Exactly what I was trying to get across... Link to comment
Big Man Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Fresh Scandal : ''Milk Contaminated With Bleach'' has now been found at the hospital. Looks like this c@nt might still be on the loose... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2036552/Fresh-poisoning-scare-saline-death-hospital-milk-contaminated-BLEACH.html Link to comment
madjockmcferson Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 If she is innocent then she has a very good reason to sue them. Newspapers shouldn't be allowed to show pictures and names of "potential" criminals until they have been proven guilty. Especially when it comes to something as serious as this, or rape (adult or child). ^ this. Link to comment
muttondressedaslamb Posted September 12, 2011 Share Posted September 12, 2011 Didn't the guy who was arrested initially for the murder of Joanne Yeats sue the Sun and other newspapers for heaps of money? Quite right imo. Something should be done to curb the powers of the media who can jeopardise criminal cases. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now