vanderark14 Posted August 22, 2011 Share Posted August 22, 2011 Bluto this isn't a criticism but is there a point? Link to comment
tup Posted August 22, 2011 Share Posted August 22, 2011 Perhaps we should ban the corporates from football, as they've ruined it? Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted August 22, 2011 Author Share Posted August 22, 2011 Bluto this isn't a criticism but is there a point? isnt it obvious? ;-) no proint really. just poinst for thought and dicussion? look at the lopsided television revenue in spain. man united able to generate 4m a year from theri training kit? froggy clubs also spending big. they bought pastore, so a team to look out for, perhaps? samuel eto's wage is pretty good, eh? those were my points. Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted August 22, 2011 Author Share Posted August 22, 2011 Perhaps we should ban the corporates from football, as they've ruined it? there is certainly an awful lot of money running through all football. nae need to ban coprorates, but i think a max wage would be a good start Link to comment
Henry Posted August 22, 2011 Share Posted August 22, 2011 The figures are actually slighty better than that. Tottenham get 10 mill a year from Autonomy, for sponsorship of their 'league' kit. I resume they get more cash above that for their cup/Euro games. Some websites have the DHL deal for United @ 40 mill over 4 years. Link to comment
tup Posted August 22, 2011 Share Posted August 22, 2011 Last time I get my parcels from those c**ts then. I wonder fit Caley get fae AJG Parcels? Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted August 22, 2011 Author Share Posted August 22, 2011 nobody think barcelona getting nearly 30 times as much tv money as their competitors is a little bit unfair? Link to comment
vanderark14 Posted August 22, 2011 Share Posted August 22, 2011 nobody think barcelona getting nearly 30 times as much tv money as their competitors is a little bit unfair? of course it is the spanish league is just a richer SPL. two teams get the lions share and the rest can get te f**k Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted August 22, 2011 Author Share Posted August 22, 2011 of course it is the spanish league is just a richer SPL. two teams get the lions share and the rest can get te f**k whats the relative ration here? Link to comment
Henry Posted August 22, 2011 Share Posted August 22, 2011 Revenue distribution+ All revenues generated by the SPL are effectively put into one pot. This money comes from TV deals and other commercial contracts. + A support payment to the SFL and parachute payments to recently relegated clubs are then removed. All associated costs of running the SPL are also deducted. + The remaining amount is split two ways to the member clubs: 48% is divided equally between all 12 clubs while 52% is distributed to teams dependant upon their final league position. + The higher up the table that a club finishes, the more money they will receive - see table below. For season 2007/08, more than Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted August 22, 2011 Author Share Posted August 22, 2011 looks pretty fair to me harcus. that said, would be good in an ideal world for it to be the inverse. Link to comment
Henry Posted August 22, 2011 Share Posted August 22, 2011 Looks anything but fair to me Bluto. Why is it so heavily weighted towards places 1 and 2? The rate of increase is uniform, until a massive jump from third to second. Link to comment
K-9 Posted August 22, 2011 Share Posted August 22, 2011 looks pretty fair to me harcus. that said, would be good in an ideal world for it to be the inverse.Would be fun - imagine last game of lat season at Hibs with both teams trying to lose to get extra 60k!! Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted August 22, 2011 Author Share Posted August 22, 2011 Looks anything but fair to me Bluto. Why is it so heavily weighted towards places 1 and 2? The rate of increase is uniform, until a massive jump from third to second. i see what you mean. i missed that.i wonder what that extra comuple of percent equates to in hard cash? not as bad as la liga, however. Link to comment
The Boofon Posted August 22, 2011 Share Posted August 22, 2011 Looks anything but fair to me Bluto. Why is it so heavily weighted towards places 1 and 2? The rate of increase is uniform, until a massive jump from third to second. Yep just noticed that as well. I cannot see why the jump is so big either. Very odd. Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted August 22, 2011 Author Share Posted August 22, 2011 Would be fun - imagine last game of lat season at Hibs with both teams trying to lose to get extra 60k!! ha ha. i know that wouldnt work, but essentailly i meant how good it would be to have a completely fair league in that sense. Link to comment
Quagmire Posted August 22, 2011 Share Posted August 22, 2011 Getafe have released a video campaign encouraging their supporters to become sperm donors, in hope that it breeds new supporters and boosts season ticket sales in years to come. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/19/getafe-fans-sperm-donors Link to comment
The Boofon Posted August 22, 2011 Share Posted August 22, 2011 Getafe have released a video campaign encouraging their supporters to become sperm donors, in hope that it breeds new supporters and boosts season ticket sales in years to come. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/19/getafe-fans-sperm-donors Aberdeen Football Club have been treating their fans like w*nkers for years so this is nothing new. Link to comment
stand_free Posted August 22, 2011 Share Posted August 22, 2011 nobody think barcelona getting nearly 30 times as much tv money as their competitors is a little bit unfair? It's because in Spain the teams have individual contracts with TV companies, rather than selling collectively, so of course Barcelona and Real are on week in week out and therefore make way more money. Think they're in negotiations to change this but Barca and Real are still asking for a ridiculous share of the money which the rest won't agree to. Link to comment
tup Posted August 23, 2011 Share Posted August 23, 2011 Yep just noticed that as well. I cannot see why the jump is so big either. Very odd. It's fairly obvious, Rangers and Celtic take all the resources from Scottish fitba for themselves, bleed the game dry, and have engineered an 11:1 voting system which ensures their monopoly cannot be broken once set. All the other clubs chairmen are too weak willed to confront it, and are delusional enough to believe that without the two Glasgow teams our game would die, a mantra preached by? You guessed it, Rangers and Celtic. Get them to f**k and our game would surely thrive. Link to comment
diamondsr4ever Posted August 23, 2011 Share Posted August 23, 2011 It's fairly obvious, Rangers and Celtic take all the resources from Scottish fitba for themselves, bleed the game dry, and have engineered an 11:1 voting system which ensures their monopoly cannot be broken once set. All the other clubs chairmen are too weak willed to confront it, and are delusional enough to believe that without the two Glasgow teams our game would die, a mantra preached by? You guessed it, Rangers and Celtic. Get them to f**k and our game would surely thrive. what if we didnt get shot of them and had a fair and equal proportion of revenue split across the teams in the league? Link to comment
tup Posted August 23, 2011 Share Posted August 23, 2011 what if we didnt get shot of them and had a fair and equal proportion of revenue split across the teams in the league? The only way to ensure this is by sharing gate receipts, and there's more chance of hell freezing over. You should not get more money for winning the league, from the league itself, the principle is detrimental to competition and only serves to create a gap which whilst always existing has never been more pronounced and will continue to increase until addressed. Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted August 23, 2011 Author Share Posted August 23, 2011 It's fairly obvious, Rangers and Celtic take all the resources from Scottish fitba for themselves, bleed the game dry, and have engineered an 11:1 voting system which ensures their monopoly cannot be broken once set. All the other clubs chairmen are too weak willed to confront it, and are delusional enough to believe that without the two Glasgow teams our game would die, a mantra preached by? You guessed it, Rangers and Celtic. Get them to f**k and our game would surely thrive. you see tups its things like this that i see as being the reasons for having a sh*t league. not the success of the epl taht you constantly deride. Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted August 23, 2011 Author Share Posted August 23, 2011 The only way to ensure this is by sharing gate receipts, and there's more chance of hell freezing over. You should not get more money for winning the league, from the league itself, the principle is detrimental to competition and only serves to create a gap which whilst always existing has never been more pronounced and will continue to increase until addressed. individual money like gate receipts and sponsership is fair enough. the money form the spl should be evenly split though. Link to comment
diamondsr4ever Posted August 23, 2011 Share Posted August 23, 2011 The only way to ensure this is by sharing gate receipts, and there's more chance of hell freezing over. You should not get more money for winning the league, from the league itself, the principle is detrimental to competition and only serves to create a gap which whilst always existing has never been more pronounced and will continue to increase until addressed. gate receipts should sit with the club, I have no issue with that. what "if" at the start of the season all clubs had an equal split of cash across the board for league appearances, tv etc.....would you still have the OF in the league? Link to comment
StandFree1982 Posted August 23, 2011 Share Posted August 23, 2011 you see tups its things like this that i see as being the reasons for having a sh*t league. not the success of the epl taht you constantly deride.The EPL would be even more of a one horse race if there wasn't foreign investors coming in and ploughing money into clubs like Man City and Chelsea! Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted August 23, 2011 Author Share Posted August 23, 2011 gate receipts should sit with the club, I have no issue with that. what "if" at the start of the season all clubs had an equal split of cash across the board for league appearances, tv etc.....would you still have the OF in the league? i would say yes. they are scottish afterall. they just shouldnt be treated any differeently to aberdeen, hearts, etc. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now