Dynamo Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 So if the last 2 were must win, what does that make this one! Home game, I EXPECT a win. Plus if you know a season ticket hold you can get in for Link to comment
Stoney Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 Home game against St Mirren is a gimmie, will do the minimum and win 2-0. We have to - looking at the other games this weekend you would have to imagine the teams around us getting at least draws, would even fancy a couple to win. What are we 9 points off top 6 now? As RTYD said in an earlier thread. Its time to man the fuck up. Only problem i can see is hasslebaink running out our bombscare defence, and as always the long ball which has been our problem since day one of the season. Link to comment
Site Sponsor RTYD Posted December 5, 2011 Site Sponsor Share Posted December 5, 2011 So if the last 2 were must win, what does that make this one! Home game, I EXPECT a win. Plus if you know a season ticket hold you can get in for Link to comment
Stoney Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 Just noticed that both St Mirren full backs have three assists each this season, that surely doesnt bode well! What changes can brown possibley make this week? Why is he not going with pawlett instead of clark? Mccardle instead of Mawene? Magennis instead of Falon? Try something new? Link to comment
RUL Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 Our only hope is St Mirren are as bad as us, i'll probably stick us on a coupon as the law of averages this team has to fluke a result eventually? Link to comment
Crossbow Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 Our only hope is St Mirren are as bad as us, i'll probably stick us on a coupon as the law of averages this team has to fluke a result eventually? We were played off the park at Paisley. We can only hope St Mirren have somehow got worse. Link to comment
muttonhumper Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 So if the last 2 were must win, what does that make this one!Are they all must win until we actually win een? Is that how it works? Link to comment
Dynamo Posted December 5, 2011 Author Share Posted December 5, 2011 Are they all must win until we actually win een? Is that how it works? I think Brown calls them "Must not lose" games. Link to comment
Crossbow Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 I think Brown calls them "Must not lose" games. He's not doing very well then. All games are games we want to win. In the words of Al Davis "Just win" Link to comment
sooth_stander Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 I think Brown calls them "Must not lose" games. Is Chalali still away on Olympic duty? If not then I'd start him on saturday alongside Vernon and instead of that lump of wood Fallon. You just know that if Arnie is fit to play, then he will shunt Fyvie out wide, which is no good to anybody. Broon is hanging on here by his fingertips, he might as well give Pawlett a run out wide. I'd stick Arnie alongside Mawene in central defence, with Foster at RB and Conso at LB. Black Andy Goram FosterMaweneArnieConsidine PPFFOzzieMillson ChalaliVernon Link to comment
a don in oz Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 If Jack isn't fit and Arnason is, I'd go with that back-line definitely sooth_stander. Neither Clark nor McArdle are full backs. Clark these days is apparently not much of anything so he needs to be kept clear of that first team. Link to comment
tup Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 We don't need a defence against St Mirren, I'd go 0-4-6, with Vernon, Chalali, Magennis, Mackie, Megginson, and Pawlett up front. Arnason, Osbourne, Milsom and Jack in midfield. Link to comment
sooth_stander Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 If Jack isn't fit and Arnason is, I'd go with that back-line definitely sooth_stander. Neither Clark nor McArdle are full backs. Clark these days is apparently not much of anything so he needs to be kept clear of that first team. I agree with you, and myself Two left footers on the left flank, and two right footers on the right flank. Bejesus, I could manage AFC!!!!!!!! Link to comment
muttonhumper Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 If Jack isn't fit and Arnason is, I'd go with that back-line definitely sooth_stander. Neither Clark nor McArdle are full backs. Clark these days is apparently not much of anything so he needs to be kept clear of that first team. Both apparently expected to be fit according to the latest mutterings in the rag.Would be a big boost.Possibly our 2 best players this season. Jack Arnason Link to comment
Jazzer_Bett Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 Was just posting elswhere, on a wider subject - but the team line ups from Dunfy and Arabs at home should finally be available to us again. As depressing as it has been lately you have to assume that if that exact team be fielded again then the chances of getting a good win against Smurn are fair to good??? Please......?!! Link to comment
ollie1903 Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 If Jack isn't fit and Arnason is, I'd go with that back-line definitely sooth_stander. Neither Clark nor McArdle are full backs. Clark these days is apparently not much of anything so he needs to be kept clear of that first team.Handing Chris Clark a three year contract is, in itself, a sackable offence. Link to comment
The Boofon Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 We don't need a defence against St Mirren, I'd go 0-4-6, with Vernon, Chalali, Magennis, Mackie, Megginson, and Pawlett up front. Arnason, Osbourne, Milsom and Jack in midfield. yoor hilarioos! Exactly. Who in their right mind would play Mackie up front? Link to comment
Tommy Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 Who in their right mind would play Mackie up front? Brown obviously isn't in the right mind so i've no idea. Link to comment
SoundOfSilence Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 Handing Chris Clark a three year contract is, in itself, a sackable offence. Seen a few people saying this now, having a dig at Brown.And not having a go at you here Ollie, a genuine question on the subject. How much input does Brown have on the contracts handed out? Does he say I want Clark for 3 years and Miller/Fraser negotiate just the salary? Link to comment
Stoney Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 Regardless of the length of deal brown should never have signed clark - waste of a wage. Brown or Gonzo (other was a waste of a wage) LB (instead of clark)Considine (Mcardle for cover)Center back (instead of Mawene)Foster (backed up by jack) LW (instead of ozzieArnssonMilsom (backed up by fyvieRW (Instead of Falon) (Backed up by pawlett) VernonStriker (Instead of Chalali) Backed up by josh and mackie Link to comment
K-9 Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 Regardless of the length of deal brown should never have signed clark - waste of a wage. Brown or Gonzo (other was a waste of a wage) LB (instead of clark)Considine (Mcardle for cover)Center back (instead of Mawene)Foster (backed up by jack) LW (instead of ozzieArnssonMilsom (backed up by fyvieRW (Instead of Falon) (Backed up by pawlett) VernonStriker (Instead of Chalali) Backed up by josh and mackieSeemed it was the now normal problem at Aberdeen and the lack of homework and preparations in lead up to the summer once again killied us. Deja Vu if you like. Pleanty time to prepare and identify players in lead up but went into summer totally unprepared and then at start of season once again had shortage of players and were scraping around for others, culminating in panic signings like Fallon and Chalali instead of players in positions we knew needed filled for around 6 months earlier. Link to comment
Crossbow Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 Seemed it was the now normal problem at Aberdeen and the lack of homework and preparations in lead up to the summer once again killied us. Deja Vu if you like. Pleanty time to prepare and identify players in lead up but went into summer totally unprepared and then at start of season once again had shortage of players and were scraping around for others, culminating in panic signings like Fallon and Chalali instead of players in positions we knew needed filled for around 6 months earlier. but chalali is going to explode and Clark was signed with plenty of time to do better - surely this is simply Broons mess - he chose the players we got - and he got some good ones eg arnason but failed miserably to address the balance of squad issues and wasted money on dross. Like Magoo before him we are no better off - everything else is sophistry. Yes, there are flaws with the players and there are flaws at Pittodrie but money has been given, a squad misassembled and a culprit who needs removed before the joke becomes deadly serious. Link to comment
K-9 Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 but chalali is going to explode and Clark was signed with plenty of time to do better - surely this is simply Broons mess - he chose the players we got - and he got some good ones eg arnason but failed miserably to address the balance of squad issues and wasted money on dross. Like Magoo before him we are no better off - everything else is sophistry. Yes, there are flaws with the players and there are flaws at Pittodrie but money has been given, a squad misassembled and a culprit who needs removed before the joke becomes deadly serious.Spot on. Link to comment
rossafc92 Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 Both apparently expected to be fit according to the latest mutterings in the rag.Would be a big boost.Possibly our 2 best players this season. Jack Arnason I'd agree, Jack and Arnason have been our two of our best players this season along with Osbourne and Considine. With Jack at right back (and not at right midfield like he was against the Pars), and Arnason back in the centre, I think we have enough to win on Saturday. Would like to see Pawlett out wide right, rather than Fyvie too. Link to comment
Sonoftherock Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 but chalali is going to explode and Clark was signed with plenty of time to do better - surely this is simply Broons mess - he chose the players we got - and he got some good ones eg arnason but failed miserably to address the balance of squad issues and wasted money on dross. Like Magoo before him we are no better off - everything else is sophistry. Yes, there are flaws with the players and there are flaws at Pittodrie but money has been given, a squad misassembled and a culprit who needs removed before the joke becomes deadly serious. Excellent post. Bang on the money. Link to comment
ollie1903 Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 Seen a few people saying this now, having a dig at Brown.And not having a go at you here Ollie, a genuine question on the subject. How much input does Brown have on the contracts handed out? Does he say I want Clark for 3 years and Miller/Fraser negotiate just the salary?The manager has to have the say on contract length surely? It's his team and his plan. Link to comment
OneBeboMaguire Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 News is that Kari and Jacko set to return so would like to see us go with this if so: Brown Jack Mawene Considine Foster Clarky Osbourne Arnason Milsom Magennis Fallon* *If Chalali is not back yet Heart says 2-0 us, Head 1-1 draw which imo isn't good enough Link to comment
wilm1542 Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 Anything other than a win is unacceptable. Link to comment
Dandyjam Posted December 5, 2011 Share Posted December 5, 2011 We'll win this, I'm fairly confident. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now