tup Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/apr/09/girl-guides-sun-page-3 Girl guides want them banned. Rupert Murdoch is 'considering' it. I think it's irrelevant since most non-neanderthals dinna buy The Sun in any case. Link to comment
Dynamo Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 Put them on Page 5 or something then. Compromise is the key. Link to comment
tup Posted April 9, 2013 Author Share Posted April 9, 2013 It is a bit of an archaic practice it has to be said, the tins of lager dispensed with it decades ago. Link to comment
Henry Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 I'm not sure why the Girl Guides are reading The Sun anyway, surely The Beano is more up their street, or perhaps Take a Break! if they're a bit more mature. Link to comment
tup Posted April 9, 2013 Author Share Posted April 9, 2013 Yes it does seem a bit of a strange crusade for the Girl Guides to say the least. Link to comment
looksgoodinred Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 i could be wrong, but i doubt most young women are checking out the page 3 girls. they are however being bombarded with images in advertising, TV, film and music of "perfect" bodies. i'd have a bigger issue with digitally altering photographs of women used in media; i think that probably does more damage to most women's self-esteem than a pair of breasts. 1 Link to comment
Henry Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 Next week: The Brownies demand an end to double vaginal, double anal porn. 6 Link to comment
Henry Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 I see Google (1) is checking this thread out, I wonder what Google (2) is up to. Link to comment
Henry Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 My advice to the Girl Guides would be to set up a daily newspaper with a picture of a man with his cock and bollocks out each day on page 3, play The Sun at their own game. Link to comment
tup Posted April 9, 2013 Author Share Posted April 9, 2013 It's maybe Craig Whyte, old Google (Eye) himself. Link to comment
Sheep#1 Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 It is a bit of an archaic practice it has to be said, the tins of lager dispensed with it decades ago.I seen the advert for the BBC Alba documentary about Gothenburg and was a shot of fans on the St Clair, with hundreds of those cans everywhere. Took me back to my youth, when I had finished helping my old man on a Sat & he would give me a swally from his can, as I eyed the 'lager lovely'. Halcyon days indeed. Link to comment
CrazyBullSheep Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 I think they should bin it only on the understanding that a girl guide 2014 Fanny calendar is released Link to comment
looksgoodinred Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 I think they should bin it only on the understanding that a girl guide 2014 Fanny calendar is released if you're going to start pushing for a fanny calendar, i'd hope you're suggesting it be group leaders (since GG's only go to age 17)? pixie and brownie perving would be bad. Link to comment
CrazyBullSheep Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 I think they should bin it only on the understanding that a girl guide 2014 Fanny calendar is released if you're going to start pushing for a fanny calendar, i'd hope you're suggesting it be group leaders (since GG's only go to age 17)? pixie and brownie perving would be bad. Obviously I mean the Group leaders AKA Mother owls age between 17 and 83 Link to comment
looksgoodinred Posted April 9, 2013 Share Posted April 9, 2013 I think they should bin it only on the understanding that a girl guide 2014 Fanny calendar is released if you're going to start pushing for a fanny calendar, i'd hope you're suggesting it be group leaders (since GG's only go to age 17)? pixie and brownie perving would be bad. Obviously I mean the Group leaders AKA Mother owls age between 17 and 83 you should volunteer to review all candidate submissions. you know.. just to do your bit for the community Link to comment
tightbreeks Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 I've never heard a lass moan to me about page 3, no opinion what so ever. the grauniad says fuck and i'm sure cunt in its paper. Link to comment
tightbreeks Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 the guardian newspaper. in the olden days and maybe still now, they were atroshus at spelling. so they even called themselves the grauniad. yes, i'm a twat. Link to comment
dj_bollocks Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 The problem I have is, is it to be binned as an act of censorship or because females/feminists/lesbians are "offended" by it. At which point do you effectively censor any and every bit of topless nudity everywhere ? Some student unions recently banned The Sun I believe because of Page 3, however they didn't ban Zoo or Nuts or any other mag they might sell that might contain female topless nudity. At which point I could possibly become offended by any mag that has "sex" on the front cover - so that includes all chick mags then... So yes censorship - when you start, it very difficult to stop... Link to comment
tightbreeks Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 right back at you, let the wild rumpus begin. Link to comment
jassb Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 I'd put Kathy Lloyd in the list. No surprises with No 1. http://uk.askmen.com/top_10/entertainment_300/338_top_10_list.html Link to comment
looksgoodinred Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 how do you feel about taking your family to a "breastaurant"? Hooters and the like. this one's called Twin Peaks. "Eats. Drinks. And scenic views." lol the teenage boys in the establishment look, for the most part, like they've died and gone to heaven. onywye, breastaurants... family-friendly? or not so much? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/10/twin-peaks-restaurant-video-family-friendly_n_3053057.html?utm_hp_ref=women&ir=Women Link to comment
tightbreeks Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 I mind scrattish lynsey dawn Mackenzie, the daily sport one with the massive gajungas. Link to comment
Ke1t Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 how do you feel about taking your family to a "breastaurant"? Hooters and the like. this one's called Twin Peaks. "Eats. Drinks. And scenic views." lol the teenage boys in the establishment look, for the most part, like they've died and gone to heaven. onywye, breastaurants... family-friendly? or not so much? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/10/twin-peaks-restaurant-video-family-friendly_n_3053057.html?utm_hp_ref=women&ir=Women I don't mind Hooters, though I only really go there at other people's behest. Wouldn't be my first choice of restaurant, because I'm not into the whole 'fake interest' thing they have their waitresses do with the customers. They'll sit down as you're eating and start asking you shit about yourself, when , frankly, you just want to eat and stare at their tits and arses. That doesn't involve talking to them. Only time you really hear complaints about them is from your typical ugly, Birkenstock-wearing lezza types, and no-one's interested in what they have to say about shit. They closed down the Hooters in Taylor, I think it was. Taylortucky as it's more commonly known. It was the Mos Isley Cantina of Restaurants. A more wretched hive of AIDS-carriers and skanks you'd be hard pressed to find. TaylorTucky Named Taylortucky because everybody sports mullets, drives rustangs, pick up trucks, wears wife beaters and drinks Old Milwaukee beer. Drop out rate in schools is high, most graduates and drop outs resort to drugs, and continue living with their parents. What does a Taylor girl do when she gets up in the morning? Goes home. That is so Taylortucky. Link to comment
daytripping Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 I've been in bars abroad where the girls behind the bar were topless, bit tacky to be honest, would rather a hooters type place where it was left to your imagination. Page 3 is an institution, just a pretty girl in your paper, something nice to look at in the morning, just leave it alone, harms no one, don't like, don't buy the paper. Why in this Country are people obsessed with the human body, that bloke who walks about naked got jailed for Months, imo he was doing nothing wrong, want to walk about naked fucking go ahead, it's how god intended (if he existed). In Scandinavia no one would bat an eye to a naked body, here we get hung up about it. 1 Link to comment
ChutneyLove Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 I got a genuine offer from a Hooters bird in Orlando. My arms are like a National winners thigh but still it was nice all the same. The 911 wings are the dogs balls. You could just about get yer paps oot on page-3 'pipes? Link to comment
BrianFaePerth Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 I got a genuine offer from a Hooters bird in Orlando. My arms are like a National winners thigh but still it was nice all the same. The 911 wings are the dogs balls. Hmm must have been a different branch tae the one eh have been to in Orlando. We were there for some refreshments on a stag do. One of our party made a lighthearted comments about the tits of the waitresses, was overheard by one, and got a look that lowered the temperature in the room by a hundred degrees. Ironically she had fantastic tits and was happy to wear a skimpy t-shirt to display them Link to comment
360 Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 The only people who complain about this type of thing are feminists, and every single one of them is hideous. They let their jealously of good looking people get in the way of rational thinking. They are best ignored. Link to comment
Sheep#1 Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 I like the intelligent insight into a current news story that the girls share everyday, really helps me gain a better understanding of complex current affairs. Link to comment
looksgoodinred Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 and on the subject of paps... are you for or against bras? preliminary research (the result of a 15-year study of women's anatomy ) suggests that bras may do more harm than good. What the French know as the “soutien-gorge” could, in fact, be positively harmful in terms of posture and muscle tone. Wearing a bra means “supporting tissues will not grow and even they will wither and the breast will gradually degrade,” Mr. Rouillon, a sports scientist, warned. Who wants withered and degraded breast tissue? although there's an argument in favour of the "social dimension" of nice-looking underwear. http://rendezvous.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/04/11/france-debates-the-merits-of-the-bra/ Link to comment
jassb Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 Mmmmmmmm. I've been carrying out a life long study, unpaid, and so far i can only say I'm undecided as some breasts look better in bras and some don't. I'll keep studying and get back to you with my findings in another 10 years or so. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now