jassb Posted August 18, 2013 Share Posted August 18, 2013 Was thinking about this yesterday. Why does a player have to leave the pitch after getting treatment? I can see that it might save players time wasting by pretending to be injured, but when it is a real injury the team are put to a further disadvantage for having a player injured. Link to comment
Dynamo Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 I always think the player who fouls a player leading to injury should go off too until the player is fit to come back on or a sub is made. Link to comment
OddJob Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 Although it'll never happen, i think that they should consider bringing in blood replacements. For instance look at the Scotland v.s Guffs game, Hanley goes off for treatment and they scored whilst he was off the pitch. Imo that's vey unfair Link to comment
SoundOfSilence Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 Noticed this last night during the guffie fitba. Taylor whacked Silva o'er the heed and got sent off. The ref let Newcastle make a sub but made Silva stand off the pitch until the freekick was taken and cleared. How is that fair? Link to comment
OddJob Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 Willo BloodWillem Vein Der ArkJamie Bloody Langfield Nae bad Link to comment
Redstar Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 I always think the player who fouls a player leading to injury should go off too until the player is fit to come back on or a sub is made. That notion is far to much like "a level playing field" for our West Coast "friends" Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now