vanderark14 Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 Losing to him is bottling it, you're not getting it at all. No surprise to see dullard ollie1903 putting his oar in. There is no difference in ability. The difference is bottle. Murray does not have it against Djokovic, he lost his composure again today. It's all psychological.I'm fully aware of what you are getting at, I just completely disagree with it. I'll agree to disagree with that but saying there no difference in ability is just plain wrong. Djockovic is in a league of his own in this current pool of tennis players. Link to comment
vanderark14 Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 Half the battle getting the crowd on your side I would say, Murray does himself no favours on that side of things with his miserable personalityHe's actually not as miserable as he's been made out to be. Link to comment
tup Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 No the first set, when Murray was in the right frame of mind, was evidence that there is no difference in ability. Murray lost his composure in the second set, over something off court. Remember Murray and Djokovic would have been on 3 out of 4 slams each had Murray won today. So to say there's a big gulf in ability is seriously wide of the mark. Murray can beat everyone else. 1 Link to comment
vanderark14 Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 No the first set, when Murray was in the right frame of mind, was evidence that there is no difference in ability. Murray lost his composure in the second set, over something off court. Remember Murray and Djokovic would have been on 3 out of 4 slams each had Murray won today. So to say there's a big gulf in ability is seriously wide of the mark. Murray can beat everyone else.Murray would have been on 3 slams but djockovic would have been on 11. It's now 12-2 in favour of djockovic. Djockovic has also won much more masters and ATP 500 tournaments. To say there is no difference in ability is lunacy. 1 Link to comment
vanderark14 Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 No the first set, when Murray was in the right frame of mind, was evidence that there is no difference in ability. Murray lost his composure in the second set, over something off court. Remember Murray and Djokovic would have been on 3 out of 4 slams each had Murray won today. So to say there's a big gulf in ability is seriously wide of the mark. Murray can beat everyone else.Murray would have been on 3 slams but djockovic would have been on 11. It's now 12-2 in favour of djockovic. Djockovic has also won much more masters and ATP 500 tournaments. To say there is no difference in ability is lunacy. Link to comment
ollie1903 Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 Losing to him is bottling it, you're not getting it at all. No surprise to see dullard ollie1903 putting his oar in. There is no difference in ability.Hahahahahaha. What a cunt you've made of that one. Link to comment
vanderark14 Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 No I haven't.Haha you never fail to disappoint tup Link to comment
ollie1903 Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 To say that Djokovic is not a better tennis player than Murray is either complete ignorance, or sheer idiocy. 1 Link to comment
tommo1903 Posted June 5, 2016 Share Posted June 5, 2016 Djokovic is a better tennis player, partly because of his mental toughness. Murray's ability, at the top of his game, isn't as good as Djokovic at the top of his. Andy Murray has won 2 out of 10 slam finals. I'd argue if he was mentally tougher he could have added another 3 to that (Federer 2012 Wimbledon, Aus Open 2013 v Djok & this tournament were all there for the taking before he visibly got himself all to fuck. He nearly fucked it with the US Open he did win as well. Make of that what you will. Link to comment
tup Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 To say that Djokovic is not a better tennis player than Murray is either complete ignorance, or sheer idiocy.You can think what you want to think. I'm still right. 1 Link to comment
Dynamo Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 Djokovic is a machine. He's so good. Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 Who gives a fuck, it's tennis FFS Link to comment
vanderark14 Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 Who gives a fuck, it's tennis FFSWell fuck off into another thread you twat. 1 2 Link to comment
vanderark14 Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 I reckon it just took the drugs a set to kick in for Djockovic yesterday Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 Well fuck off into another thread you twat.Harsh words on a Internet forum vda min. It was a joke, Less of the insults, eh. Link to comment
ollie1903 Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 You can think what you want to think. I'm still right. Link to comment
vanderark14 Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 Come on Ollie, it's tup, he's never wrong at anything.? Link to comment
boboisared Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 What an absolute Fanny, who the fuck draws a heart in the court and then lays on in it like that?? He's done brilliantly and deserves to be where he is but this pandering is laughable He's desperate to be loved.I reckon it just took the drugs a set to kick in for Djockovic yesterday Link to comment
vanderark14 Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 He's desperate to be loved.The drugs bit was a joke bobo Link to comment
minijc Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 The drugs bit was a joke boboWouldn't be surprised if he was on something, whether it's banned or not as the levels he's reached so quickly are rather frightening. Link to comment
boboisared Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 The drugs bit was a joke boboIf you look online it won't take you more than 10 seconds to find a lot pf rumours regarding Djokovic and Nadal. Link to comment
minijc Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 https://ewanmackenna.wordpress.com/2014/11/05/a-racket-with-no-net/ Link to comment
boboisared Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 https://ewanmackenna.wordpress.com/2014/11/05/a-racket-with-no-net/Thanks Minj, hadn't read that before. There was a great link on here years ago (I think it was you who had found that one also) and it had a lot of evidence to suggest a lot of Nadals injurys were drug breaks. EDIT: Murray hinted recently that he thinks some players are on drugs and Becker (Djokovic's coach) was straight on it, having a go. Link to comment
vanderark14 Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 Thanks Minj, hadn't read that before. There was a great link on here years ago (I think it was you who had found that one also) and it had a lot of evidence to suggest a lot of Nadals injurys were drug breaks. EDIT: Murray hinted recently that he thinks some players are on drugs and Becker (Djokovic's coach) was straight on it, having a go. Becker was very defensive and quick to respond to Murray. There was nothing wrong with what Murray said and if people have nothing to hide they have no reason to respond. Link to comment
boboisared Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 Becker was very defensive and quick to respond to Murray. There was nothing wrong with what Murray said and if people have nothing to hide they have no reason to respond.Yip. Link to comment
RAZOR Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 https://ewanmackenna.wordpress.com/2014/11/05/a-racket-with-no-net/ Fair play to Gasquet Link to comment
boboisared Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 Fair play to Gasquet Yeah, that ones brilliant. Must have licked it clean aff her gums. Link to comment
ollie1903 Posted June 6, 2016 Share Posted June 6, 2016 Yeah, that ones brilliant. Must have licked it clean aff her gums.Or fud? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now