Fake Spokesperson Emails

[HectorMac]

Selection of emails sent by NKS using their fake spokesperson.

They talked about using the fake person to launch an attack on two Councillors because they were pro-stadium or Dons fans - but decided to use a real person - very brave.

From: Charlie Love

Sent: 14 August 2016 16:42

To: Diane Reid

Cc: Clare Davidson; Heather Brock

Subject: Re: Politicians' feedback

Hi all,

Angus gave an interview with P&J today in relation to this survey. The survey is poorly constructed (survey monkey could have produced a branching poll or something much more sophisticated)– it also could have required specific information so that respondents can be identified as coming from Westhill.

The interview with P&J went as follows:

We welcome the survey by Stewart Donaldson –the people of Westhill are absolutely against this stadium proposal and wish to retain the green belt between Kingswells and Westhill.

We have some concerns as to the accuracy of the survey because we know that the link to the survey is being shared across football forums with many from outside the area likely completing it.

Charlie

From: Charlie Love

Sent: 27 August 2017 14:10

To: Matthew Reid

Cc: Diane Reid; Clare Davidson; Heather Brock

Subject: Re: Letter

Yes.

He is next. Just have to draft the letter.

C

On 27 Aug 2017 12:32, Matthew Reid wrote:

Will we be considering our approach to the chap that has 500 AFC shares too?

Please forgive me if message brief - it's sent from my tablet pc

On 27 Aug 2017, at 12:29, Heather Brock wrote:

Absolutely Matthew, I know that. Thank you ?

On 27 Aug 2017, at 12:28, Matthew Reid wrote:

No bother. You know I just express this cos I care H!

M Please forgive me if message brief - it's sent from my tablet pc

On 27 Aug 2017, at 12:07, Charlie Love wrote:

Hi all

I agree with Heather. Using a pseudonym for such a legal letter may undermine it.

I think it needs to be from HB.

Charlie

On 27 Aug 2017 12:00, Heather Brock wrote:

I don't mind my name being on it. I think it's better to use a real person - sorry Angus!

HB

On 27 Aug 2017, at 11:54, Matthew Reid wrote: Could we just put this in under Angus name - just to keep the heat off Heather? Does it really matter that we put the 'weight' of Director behind this?

I'm just keen that we limit any hassle that comes towards those that have been willing to put their names down as directors.

M

Sent from my iPad

From: Charlie Love

Sent: 27 August 2017 09:56

To: Matthew Reid; Diane Reid; Heather Brock;; clare davidson

Subject: Complaint about Alison Alphonse Importance: High

Comments please – this needs to go in ASAP

Thanks

Charlie

From: Charlie Love

Sent: 13 August 2016 17:52

To: Diane Reid; Heather Brock

Subject: Pre-application Forum

Hi all,

The pre-application forum is an open public session. Details below. Some of us could go along – may be a chance to hear what the councillors think and maybe even speak to some of them.

Charlie

Dear Mr Jamieson

The Pre-application Forum is held in open public session and thus members of the public are welcome to attend. The Pre-application Forum will take place on Thursday 18th August at 2.00pm. It will be held in Committee Room 2 in the Town House (entrance off Broad Street). I would advise that the Forum will be considering two matters. The proposed stadium will be the second development on the agenda. I trust this information is sufficient to meet your needs.

regards xxxxxxxxxxx

Team Leader (Development Management South) Planning and Sustainable Development | Communities, Housing and Infrastructure | Aberdeen City Council | Business Hub 4 | Ground Floor North | Marischal College | Broad Street | Aberdeen AB10 1AB Tel. (01224) 522198 General ACC Customer Contact. (03000) 200 292 Customer Feedback Survey: https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/PlanningDM

 

[Zeus]

Ooooooooft hahahahaha

 

Hud on. That's made up surely

[Zeus]

Selection of emails sent by NKS using their fake spokesperson.

 

They talked about using the fake person to launch an attack on two Councillors because they were pro-stadium or Dons fans - but decided to use a real person - very brave.

 

From: Charlie Love

 

Sent: 14 August 2016 16:42

 

To: Diane Reid

 

Cc: Clare Davidson; Heather Brock

 

Subject: Re: Politicians' feedback

 

Hi all,

 

Angus gave an interview with P&J today in relation to this survey. The survey is poorly constructed (survey monkey could have produced a branching poll or something much more sophisticated)– it also could have required specific information so that respondents can be identified as coming from Westhill.

 

The interview with P&J went as follows:

 

We welcome the survey by Stewart Donaldson –the people of Westhill are absolutely against this stadium proposal and wish to retain the green belt between Kingswells and Westhill.

 

We have some concerns as to the accuracy of the survey because we know that the link to the survey is being shared across football forums with many from outside the area likely completing it.

 

Charlie

 

 

 

 

From: Charlie Love

 

Sent: 27 August 2017 14:10

 

To: Matthew Reid

 

Cc: Diane Reid; Clare Davidson; Heather Brock

 

Subject: Re: Letter

 

Yes.

 

He is next. Just have to draft the letter.

C

 

On 27 Aug 2017 12:32, Matthew Reid wrote:

 

Will we be considering our approach to the chap that has 500 AFC shares too?

Please forgive me if message brief - it's sent from my tablet pc

 

On 27 Aug 2017, at 12:29, Heather Brock wrote:

 

Absolutely Matthew, I know that. Thank you

 

On 27 Aug 2017, at 12:28, Matthew Reid wrote:

 

No bother. You know I just express this cos I care H!

 

M Please forgive me if message brief - it's sent from my tablet pc

 

On 27 Aug 2017, at 12:07, Charlie Love wrote:

 

Hi all

I agree with Heather. Using a pseudonym for such a legal letter may undermine it.

I think it needs to be from HB.

 

Charlie

 

On 27 Aug 2017 12:00, Heather Brock wrote:

 

I don't mind my name being on it. I think it's better to use a real person - sorry Angus!

HB

 

On 27 Aug 2017, at 11:54, Matthew Reid wrote: Could we just put this in under Angus name - just to keep the heat off Heather? Does it really matter that we put the 'weight' of Director behind this?

 

I'm just keen that we limit any hassle that comes towards those that have been willing to put their names down as directors.

M

Sent from my iPad

 

From: Charlie Love

 

Sent: 27 August 2017 09:56

 

To: Matthew Reid; Diane Reid; Heather Brock;; clare davidson

 

Subject: Complaint about Alison Alphonse Importance: High

 

Comments please – this needs to go in ASAP

 

Thanks

Charlie

 

 

 

 

 

From: Charlie Love

 

Sent: 13 August 2016 17:52

 

To: Diane Reid; Heather Brock

 

Subject: Pre-application Forum

 

Hi all,

 

The pre-application forum is an open public session. Details below. Some of us could go along – may be a chance to hear what the councillors think and maybe even speak to some of them.

 

Charlie

 

 

Dear Mr Jamieson

 

The Pre-application Forum is held in open public session and thus members of the public are welcome to attend. The Pre-application Forum will take place on Thursday 18th August at 2.00pm. It will be held in Committee Room 2 in the Town House (entrance off Broad Street). I would advise that the Forum will be considering two matters. The proposed stadium will be the second development on the agenda. I trust this information is sufficient to meet your needs.

 

regards xxxxxxxxxxx

 

Team Leader (Development Management South) Planning and Sustainable Development | Communities, Housing and Infrastructure | Aberdeen City Council | Business Hub 4 | Ground Floor North | Marischal College | Broad Street | Aberdeen AB10 1AB Tel. (01224) 522198 General ACC Customer Contact. (03000) 200 292 Customer Feedback Survey: https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/PlanningDM

 

Quoting this for when I'm not hammered

[V for Vendetta]

Slippery as a bag of snakes with flu aren't they?

[V for Vendetta]

I like the name 'Charlie Love'. "Would you like a cup of tea Charlie ,Love ? "

I imagine he looks exactly like Captain Darling

 

Chinless insipid cunt.

[Sonoftherock]

The NKS campaign was embarrassing enough on its own... this is another level!

 

Unbelievable how much effort and time these people have spent, only to become an absolute laughing stock.

[V for Vendetta]

It's actually pretty believable.

 

People like that don't think rules or morals apply to them, it's just something that applies to everyone else.

 

Typical entitled idiots.

[ollie1903]

"We have some concerns as to the accuracy of the survey because we know that the link to the survey is being shared across football forums with many from outside the area likely completing it."

 

Jesus fuck, the hypocrisy of this is astounding

[Dom Sullivan]

Aye, and they had the audacity to accuse AFC and to say that the likes of Stewart Milne and George Yule were using underhand practices to influence the Council.

 

Hypocrites.

 

Brilliant that they've been rumbled.

 

Any credibility they had has been shot to bits

[Bebo]

A representative from the No Kingsford group are requesting that this thread/emails be removed.

 

I think it's in the public interest to stay up regardless of the 'confidential' nature of the correspondence.


Thoughts?

[Guest milne_afc]

Fuck 'em, I say

[Bebo]

 

On what grounds do they want it removed?

 

at bebo but not @ bebo

 

 

 

Hi there,

 

It has been brought to my attention that there is a thread on AFC Chat that includes various personal i.e. private and confidential emails relating to members of the No to Kingsford campaign group. These have been posted in a new thread titled ‘Fake Spokesperson Emails’. Interestingly, the thread was started by someone with the username ‘HectorMac’ on the 13 April. This user appears to be a new member who would seem to wish to post these emails anonymously, with no regard to confidentiality, data protection, etc.

 

I would respectfully ask you to remove these emails and thread as soon as possible from this public forum as these have been posted without the permission of any individual named in the emails.

 

I would appreciate your co-operation with the above.

 

Many thanks.

 

[CraigHill]

Tell them you’ll remove it if they post it on their Facebook site, otherwise they can do one.

[RUL]

A representative from the No Kingsford group are requesting that this thread/emails be removed.

 

I think it's in the public interest to stay up regardless of the 'confidential' nature of the correspondence.

 

 

Thoughts?

I say post their request up.

[Poodler]

A representative from the No Kingsford group are requesting that this thread/emails be removed.

 

I think it's in the public interest to stay up regardless of the 'confidential' nature of the correspondence.

 

 

Thoughts?

 

If Angus were real, I bet he would get his cunt kicked right in

 

Fortunately insults/threats against fake people aren't criminal

[Bebo]

If Angus were real, I bet he would get his cunt kicked right in

 

Fortunately insults/threats against fake people aren't criminal

 

 

I wonder if Angus has a mouses ear?

 

Maybe @@The Boofon can confirm?

[Redforever86]

Angus shags kids

[scoot]

I would love to see Milnes emails regarding Pittodrie and the chances of redevelopment over the years....

[Tommy]

Just move the thread to The 1000 Club.

[Poodler]

Angus is bacteria

[Don Fonte]

Angus is riding Heather.

[The Boofon]

 

 

I wonder if Angus has a mouses ear?

 

Maybe @@The Boofon can confirm?

Legally Im unable to confirm that but I suspect hes tighter than a bees nostril. ?

[The Boofon]

A representative from the No Kingsford group are requesting that this thread/emails be removed.

 

I think it's in the public interest to stay up regardless of the 'confidential' nature of the correspondence.

 

 

Thoughts?

Yip they can get fucked. The requester that is not the emails.

[The Boofon]

Have the EE deleted the articles?

 

Nope. Keep them up.

[Don Fonte]

A representative from the No Kingsford group are requesting that this thread/emails be removed.

 

I think it's in the public interest to stay up regardless of the 'confidential' nature of the correspondence.

 

 

Thoughts?

I think they should be put up everywhere possible online.

[Tommy]

I think they should be put up everywhere possible online.

Seems to have started, that’s it appeared on FB.

Hell mend them.

[Don Fonte]

Nice. Fuck them.

[Ohjimmyjimmy]

Up yours Westhill Hoors.

[V for Vendetta]

I think maybe if each of the individual correspondants wants to contact the hat and explain why they want their section if the correspondence removed maybe we can do it piecemeal for them.

 

And of course their requests and explanations can be published in place of the original content as it's removed.

 

Will full names of course.

[Ohjimmyjimmy]

What's actually happened here

 

Someone has gotten hold of them making names up?

Christ man, you got shit for brains?