Jump to content

Leanne Crichton Non Appreciation Thread


Recommended Posts

I suspect this might be a somewhat niche short lived thread but I absolutely can't abide her...

I don't know anybody who appreciates her "incisive insight" or "in depth analysis" and that voice is like nails on a black board.

Whenever she's on she absolutely makes any BBC coverage unwatchable/unlistenable for me.

I can handle Kris Boyd being a fanny for the clicks but surely to Miller if you must have female pundits there's got to be better than her...

Link to comment

Motherwell junkie boot, horrible cunt she is, although I disagree about the kris Boyd comment, fucking Uber hun he is, absolute poison and he’s the epitome of what’s wrong with this league, governing body, media and commentators, which results in  this blatant, sickly, institutional bias we see week in, week out.

ditto about the Darvel comment, horrible munter

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Guest Matt Armstrong's Dog
1 hour ago, WesthillWanderersFC said:

I’ll never forget her totally impartial BBC comments when we lost at Darvel.

She actually said this about our blatantly ONside goal at Darvel when Clarkson was at least a yard onside…

”Thank goodness VAR wasn’t here tonight to ruin the night”.

Fuck off you hun boot. 

She could eat a toffee apple through a letter box. 

She is a fucking tactless, clueless, biased cow of a misplaced spermatoza. Horrible cunt.

Remember, the host that fateful night against Darvel. Jane Lewis, revelling in our loss as well. 

Fuck her as well.

Link to comment

Most of the female pundits involved in Scottish football are crap and add nothing.

However the male pundits are easily as bad and I despise most of them as well.

Ex players handed punditry jobs who aren’t actually qualified at all - zero insight and nothing interesting to say.

Boyd, McCoist etc.

Michael Stewart is the only one with any balls and anything interesting to say imo.

Link to comment
Guest Matt Armstrong's Dog
1 minute ago, Helmet said:

Most of the female pundits involved in Scottish football are crap and add nothing.

However the male pundits are easily as bad and I despise most of them as well.

Ex players handed punditry jobs who aren’t actually qualified at all - zero insight and nothing interesting to say.

Boyd, McCoist etc.

Michael Stewart is the only one with any balls and anything interesting to say imo.

Michael Stewart is very fair and impartial in his summarising of games in real-time as well as a highlights pundit.

The rest are truly awful. Ian Crocker, in particular, is insufferable.

Link to comment
Guest Matt Armstrong's Dog
1 minute ago, ericblack4boss said:

Jane eh eh ah oh eh eh lewis

😄😄

With her use of irrelevant conjuction words to buy some time until she eventually gets to the end of her sentence,  just shows she really needs to fuck off of our telly screens and radio waves.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Helmet said:

Most of the female pundits involved in Scottish football are crap and add nothing.

However the male pundits are easily as bad and I despise most of them as well.

Ex players handed punditry jobs who aren’t actually qualified at all - zero insight and nothing interesting to say.

Boyd, McCoist etc.

Michael Stewart is the only one with any balls and anything interesting to say imo.

Nah.

He basically repeats the same cliches on a loop. Obsessed with VAR too

Link to comment
3 hours ago, WesthillWanderersFC said:

I’ll never forget her totally impartial BBC comments when we lost at Darvel.

She actually said this about our blatantly ONside goal at Darvel when Clarkson was at least a yard onside…

”Thank goodness VAR wasn’t here tonight to ruin the night”.

Fuck off you hun boot. 

She could eat a toffee apple through a letter box. 

 

3 hours ago, Johnnyred1 said:

I remember after her comments regarding the Darvel game, thinking did she actually say that!! She was advocating cheating a team out of a legitimate goal. She would never have said that against the bigot 2. Central belt bias again. Hope Miller set her straight afterwards.

You guys are far too sensitive. It's no big deal that she wanted an upset, she's not a Dons fan, and everyone likes an upset when it's not them. Nothing to do with impartiality either, these games are on TV in the hope of an upset.

I don't mind her. The idea that boyd is better than her is laughable.

Link to comment
8 minutes ago, Ramandu said:

 

You guys are far too sensitive. It's no big deal that she wanted an upset, she's not a Dons fan, and everyone likes an upset when it's not them. Nothing to do with impartiality either, these games are on TV in the hope of an upset.

I don't mind her. The idea that boyd is better than her is laughable.

Pair of hun numpties, in any case. 

Link to comment
11 minutes ago, Ramandu said:

 

You guys are far too sensitive. It's no big deal that she wanted an upset, she's not a Dons fan, and everyone likes an upset when it's not them. Nothing to do with impartiality either, these games are on TV in the hope of an upset.

I don't mind her. The idea that boyd is better than her is laughable.

Boyd is worse than her. 
It doesn’t make Crichton even average because Boyd is a semi-literate, bitter, slavering hun bastard. 

 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...