Jump to content

Pet Hates


StandFree1982

Recommended Posts


24 minutes ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said:

If it were up to me it would be, own your own and that's it. 
 

Im realistic enough to know that's nowhere near the realms of possibility. Hans asked me to ballpark a number, and I thought of something off the top of my head. 

So it’s Ok for everyone to exploit folk who need a house a little bit. You can exploit with one extra house?

That’s what you’ve pitched here  

 

 

That’s some moral compass you have there. 
 

You still haven’t answered if you refuse to use shops as they exploit people for profiting on food and clothing. 

Link to comment
4 minutes ago, manboobs109 said:

One thing I will say is that selling off social housing so that it can be rented through private landlords seems silly.

There's a private landlord round my way who by all the ex council houses for cash the day they go up on sale(or even before advertised) and rent them out dear as fuck. Seems mad.

Agree with this. 

Link to comment
57 minutes ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said:

Why don't they work for their income? They are taking someone's wages because of a necessity for shelter. 
 

You can have some cunt that inherits a property, didn't do any work to get that property, and have an income he can live off of by exploiting some poor bigger without that luxury. 
 

Im not naive enough to think it'll ever go away but I do think there should be a cap on the amount of properties people can own. 

There you go with the inheritance again. 
 

Sounds like you’ve been cut out of someone’s will for being a dweeb. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
5 minutes ago, The Boofon said:

There you go with the inheritance again. 
 

Sounds like you’ve been cut out of someone’s will for being a dweeb. 

?

 

His middle class parents were far from amused when he came back from Uni spouting his commie bullshit and calling his poor Grandmother allsorts 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
42 minutes ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said:

I can tolerate your average landlord, I know for some people, like my grandmother, it's a necessary income. 
 

I still find the idea of a landlord or the actual concept of a landlord to be one that is totally immoral. Regardless of how many properties they own. 
 

It's not an honest way to make money, if there ever has been one. 

I actually wondered why you said it was ok to rent out one house, thought to myself that goes against everything you've been saying. Your grunny is immoral.

Link to comment
27 minutes ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said:

Not at all. 
 

I'm just saying, how's it fair that someone's ability to own their own property, can be purely dictated on circumstance? How is it fair that one person can have 6 houses, and someone else none, but should be grateful for the opportunity to pay off someone else's mortgage? 
 

It's greed, quite simply. 

It’s a business. 
 

Please stop confusing inherited property with legitimate landlord business. It’s making you look stupid. 

Link to comment
35 minutes ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said:

It's not a pitch. 
 

My pitch would be fuck yous, everyone needs a house, you don't need more than one. 
 

Im aware that's not realistic so came up with a less "extreme" option for Hans' question. 
 

How could one refuse to use a shop? I don't refuse to rent either, I've rented many times in the past, hence my issue with landlords. 
 

"You are critiquing society, yet you are taking part in it, how curious?" 
 

Food/shelter/clothing or whatever it may be, should be more readily available and not accessible via means of exploitation. That's my POV. 
 

Your retort to that is "WhY dOnT u bOyCoTt sHoPs tHeN" 

 

Which I'm not going to explain to you why, but is totally stupid. 

Was your rent a reasonable rate all the time?

 

 

Link to comment
29 minutes ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said:

Not at all. 
 

I'm just saying, how's it fair that someone's ability to own their own property, can be purely dictated on circumstance? How is it fair that one person can have 6 houses, and someone else none, but should be grateful for the opportunity to pay off someone else's mortgage? 
 

It's greed, quite simply. 

You do seem to have a problem with people inheriting houses and then renting them out. Playing devils advocate, if you can’t bequeath property to your family, very few people would buy a house in the first place. 
 

Then if less people buy property as you couldn’t bequeath it, more people then rent. 
 

There seems to be a dichotomy in your argument Consi. 

Link to comment
17 minutes ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said:

In comparison to my income, absolutely not. In comparison to the problems with properties, such as mould, no heating etc, also absolutely fucking not. 

Where would you have stayed if renting was outlawed?

 

With your parents?
 

Can you maybe see there are benefits to being able to rent property albeit it sounds like you’ve picked some horrendous properties. 

Link to comment
6 minutes ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said:

I picked properties I could afford, as most people do. 
 

I have stayed with my parents previously. 
 

You're feeding into my argument, you understand people have limited choice, and renting is often a necessity through circumstance, not a want. In my experience, most people don't want to rent, but houses etc aren't affordable for a lot of young people around the country at the moment, unless you have wealthy parents willing to help- which you don't. 
 

You're asking folk to be grateful to pay someone else who has a surplus of housing, for letting them use one of their houses/flats. Think that through. 
 

 

Nobody is asking for them to be grateful. 
 

I supply something that people need. Absolutely no different to a shop owner selling food and drink to those that need it. 

Link to comment
33 minutes ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said:

You supply something people have to need because you own multiple. 
 

It is different, because at least with shops etc there are alternative, cheaper options. For people with nowhere to go, no home etc, the cheaper option is probably homelessness, a total and utter shithole dive, or a shelter. 
 

Folk have the right to be able to access affordable property. Not something many people around my age can do. 
 

Almost everyone I know that's bought a house has done so with the help of an inheritance, a parent or something or other. Everyone else is having to rent. 

Like what?  Living off the land like Bear Grylls? ?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
34 minutes ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said:

You supply something people have to need because you own multiple. 
 

It is different, because at least with shops etc there are alternative, cheaper options. For people with nowhere to go, no home etc, the cheaper option is probably homelessness, a total and utter shithole dive, or a shelter. 
 

Folk have the right to be able to access affordable property. Not something many people around my age can do. 
 

Almost everyone I know that's bought a house has done so with the help of an inheritance, a parent or something or other. Everyone else is having to rent. 

Your standards are too high IMO. 

Link to comment
11 minutes ago, Grays Babylon 1875 said:

Anyone else own properties...?

Few cunts on here thinking they are Anders Povlsen likes.

Not the Boof though - ledge.  #oohfriend 

I own 2 - mine and my old dears.  That's apparently allowed under Consi's socialist dictatorship though so no gulag for me!

Link to comment

 

4 minutes ago, ConsiCanBoogie1903 said:

Nah, more like smart price and Tesco value stuff? 
 

Made a fool of yourself there

Aye because Asda and Tesco aren't shops? 

THAT is ironic

 

2 minutes ago, Joe pike said:

I'm sure you won't be expecting any inheritance from your granny off her immoral earnings.

He's been written out for being a dweeb.  Keep up min!

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...