Big Man Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 Death penalty for these two? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-14403980 Link to comment
tutankamun Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 no one was hurt, consenting adults. Link to comment
Big Man Posted August 5, 2011 Author Share Posted August 5, 2011 no one was hurt, consenting adults. Possibly, im not sure i've formed a proper opinion about it yet. What annoys me is that he got 10 months and she got a slap on the wrist Link to comment
a don in oz Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 I really wonder about society at times. They were *both* adults... and ok, society says it's wrong, so they committed a crime. Both of them. As adults. So why the hell is this: Butler (HIM) was jailed for 10 months and Yates (HER), 26, was given a 26-week suspended term, at Birmingham Crown Court. Why? There's no minor involved here. Both adults with the same charge and totally wacky different sentences. Link to comment
tutankamun Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 I guess it was a case of 'he started it' The judge said Butler was a "manipulative individual", while Yates was "very vulnerable" and had a history of inappropriate relationships. What does "a history of inappropriate relationships" mean? Link to comment
Big Man Posted August 5, 2011 Author Share Posted August 5, 2011 I guess it was a case of 'he started it' What does "a history of inappropriate relationships" mean? It means she's a dirty shlag... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6T4X1CMZpi0 Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 i never knew cheesepies was from birmingham Link to comment
bonzodaddy73 Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 That's pretty f**ked up stuff!Of to the Gulag with them both... Link to comment
Foster14 Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 While the act is quite rightly regarded as being disgusting, why the hell is anyone getting sent to jail for it. Tax money being used to pay for the incarceration for some one having consensual sex with someone else. Link to comment
tutankamun Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 While the act is quite rightly regarded as being disgusting, why the hell is anyone getting sent to jail for it. Tax money being used to pay for the incarceration for some one having consensual sex with someone else. I think because it was the 2nd time. It's not something you want happening in society and quite rightly deemed illegal behaviour. They had effectively been previously warned with a 4 month suspended sentence. Link to comment
Dynamo Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 Its f**king sick and while they didn't harm anyone it's still against the law. He was given a slap on the wrist the first time and he didn't learn, maybe 10 months in the jail will make sure there's not a 3rd. Why she got a suspended sentence and he got prison I don't understand. Link to comment
The Boofon Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 Its f**king sick and while they didn't harm anyone it's still against the law. He was given a slap on the wrist the first time and he didn't learn, maybe 10 months in the jail will make sure there's not a 3rd. Why she got a suspended sentence and he got prison I don't understand. They should move to Banff, Macduff or Turriff as going by the locals who live there, incest is perfectly legal and commonplace. Link to comment
tup Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 the locals who live there I'm not sure where else the locals who live there would or could live. Say they moved to Glasgow for instance (may God have mercy on their souls), which is almost as bad as shagging your own daughter. They wouldna be locals then would they? It appears you may have been subject to some interbreeding in your own clan going by the kinks in your train of thought. Those in glass houses etc. Link to comment
The Boofon Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 I'm not sure where else the locals who live there would or could live. Say they moved to Glasgow for instance (may God have mercy on their souls), which is almost as bad as shagging your own daughter. They wouldna be locals then would they? It appears you may have been subject to some interbreeding in your own clan going by the kinks in your train of thought. Those in glass houses etc. Not at all. The locals who don't live there will have moved to Glasgow or other god forsaken places. Locals are people born and bred in that area. Moving away from said area makes doesn't make you a local in your new area. You're a white settler in your new area and the locals there won't speak to you. Have another week off posting to sort yersel oot again. Link to comment
Dynamo Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 They should move to Banff, Macduff or Turriff as going by the locals who live there, incest is perfectly legal and commonplace. Aye Gamrie too. Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 anyone that lives north of the bridge of don has serious problems, most likely resorted to buggery and incest long ago, and is now a lost cause. they could probably lock up all or moray the entire highlands and good portion of grampian on similar grounds to this devaint weirdo. Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 Weak. We're over, its back to war you f**king hosepipe. i was joking. was just testing your resolve to this peace treaty. i think you are wavering. besides i should still be annoyed at you as you didnt turn up to the dutch mill last night as promised. Link to comment
Dynamo Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 anyone that lives north of the bridge of don has serious problems, most likely resorted to buggery and incest long ago, and is now a lost cause. they could probably lock up all or moray the entire highlands and good portion of grampian on similar grounds to this devaint weirdo. You from up that way? You come across that you most definetly came from 'limited stock'. Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 You from up that way? You come across that you most definetly came from 'limited stock'. oi, thats below the belt! you are kidding arent you? i appreciate the countryside as much as any man, but the chances of me living in some shitehole in the arshole of nowhere are slim to f**k all. when i grow up i'll live in a historic beautiful town nearby (i.e handful of miles) to a thriving dynamic city, that way i'll get the best of both worlds. Link to comment
Bluto10 Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 I was there, i had 20 pints and 20 shorts lined up for your arrival but alas a flower bearing gent never arrived. You'd have noticed me nae bother, i was the 26 stone lost case with the ill fitting jumbo cords and Hi-Tec Squash. you have hi-tecs too. this is definitely a sign. i have hi-tec a.b.c's. Link to comment
s1dnk Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 I couldn't trust anyone with those dodgy colour changing lenses in their glasses. Link to comment
Henry Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 I always thought Mark Hateley was a sleazy b*stard Link to comment
Henry Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 Also, WYOWYN? I'd have to say yes. She's got that magic combo - thick as f**k no doot, and f**king filthy. Link to comment
phoenix Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 The Pharoahs used to keep it in the family. Thought it helped them retain power. The stupid c**t s. Nature thrives on diversity , the last thing we need is sex with our relatives. Ye end up wi' a puddle for a gene pool. Link to comment
Big Man Posted August 5, 2011 Author Share Posted August 5, 2011 Also, WYOWYN? I'd have to say yes. She's got that magic combo - thick as f**k no doot, and f**king filthy. F/uckin right - i would. Looks like utter filth, probably let you take her up the hoop whilst daddy is banged up inside... Link to comment
Henry Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 Also, WYOWYN? I'd have to say yes. She's got that magic combo - thick as f**k no doot, and f**king filthy. Around the same time fun-loving Yates updated her social networking sites, revealing a string of intimate facts about herself including that her favourite pastime was 'sex, sex, and more sex'. And five things she said she could not live without were: "Family, Andy, Mobile, Money, Straighteners." Link to comment
tup Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 Looks like utter filth, probably let you take her up the hoop whilst daddy is banged up inside... ....her fanny? Link to comment
Big Man Posted August 5, 2011 Author Share Posted August 5, 2011 ....her fanny? No, her anal passage tup. Link to comment
muttondressedaslamb Posted August 5, 2011 Share Posted August 5, 2011 ....her fanny? Haha, good one Tup!! I think the woman got off with a lighter sentence because she was the daughter and her father would have exercised power over her when she was younger and clearly when she was as an adult too. Sick as f**k imo but I don't know if it warrants jail. Community service, restraining orders, psychological help would probably be more beneficial. What will jail do in the long term? Jails need to be kept for violent offenders. Also a few of you would bang her, obviously being female I think differently, but does the fact she had sex with her dad not repulse you enough not to go near her? Or is a shag a shag? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now