dervish Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 An oven, fridge and hot plates is available to the club chef to help prepare meals for players on board. Presumably for cooking tasty treats, like dead rats. V1CAR10US Link to comment
jassb Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 hope the bus has a crash. a serious one. 1 1 Link to comment
Ingolfsson Posted July 5, 2013 Share Posted July 5, 2013 Good piece by Dons fan Michael Grant in the Herald on the attention seeking vermin. http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/opinion/rangers-have-to-keep-an-eye-on-their-spending-or-face-financial-woe-again.21493542 Ever since, there have been plenty who feared – and just as many who hoped – the club was sleepwalking its way back into insolvency. Link to comment
Karl Fletcher Posted July 5, 2013 Share Posted July 5, 2013 Administration before the end of the year hopefully. Link to comment
Pudgie Posted July 5, 2013 Share Posted July 5, 2013 Jesus. Just had a peek on hunmedia and there's some saying that the reason people are wanting them to cut costs is so they can get a return on their investment. Absolutely unbelievable! Link to comment
Karl Fletcher Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 Pre-contracts is my understanding. Sign all these cunts but they can't play them and pay them until September 1st. Basically, they found a very obvious loophole. Transfer embargo should mean just that. No transfer dealings allowed whatsoever. Link to comment
King Street Loon Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 A lot of them played over the weekend in a friendly. Link to comment
Foster14 Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 A lot of them played over the weekend in a friendly. They'll have been played as trialists. And the league rules in the Scottish lower divisions means that they can play 2 (or perhaps it is 3) trialists in any game. Meaning that some of the pre-contract players will play for them before September 1. Link to comment
Bamber Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 Pre-contracts is my understanding. Sign all these cunts but they can't play them and pay them until September 1st. Basically, they found a very obvious loophole. Transfer embargo should mean just that. No transfer dealings allowed whatsoever. Doesn't make sense though still - I reckon they may be heading for an all might c&&k-up - BE extremely funny if it happens The SFA rules state that Notwithstanding the foregoing provision,a professional Player who has failed to find employment during a registration periodmay sign and be registered for a Club outwith the Registration Periods. I'm struggling to see how they can be said to have failed to find employment when they are being used in promotional material and being played this early in the pre season. They may play them as trialists as is within the rules - it will be very interesting to see if they manage to actually register them come the 1st september as they don't seem to meet the criteria. If rangers have made any payment to them outside expenses then they are clearly in employment in a registration period Link to comment
tup Posted July 8, 2013 Share Posted July 8, 2013 Aye the big huns beat the Brora huns 2-0 yesterday. They wanted £20k for a friendly Brora were more than delighted to pay it Link to comment
Ingolfsson Posted July 10, 2013 Share Posted July 10, 2013 Aye the big huns beat the Brora huns 2-0 yesterday. They wanted £20k for a friendly Brora were more than delighted to pay it Does that not some these cunts up perfectly. Shameless scum reveling in their own misguided self-importance. Link to comment
Dynamo Posted July 10, 2013 Share Posted July 10, 2013 Aye the big huns beat the Brora huns 2-0 yesterday. They wanted £20k for a friendly Brora were more than delighted to pay it No surprise there though. The Brora Huns will have been delighted to see their big team in town. Link to comment
Pash Posted July 10, 2013 Share Posted July 10, 2013 Doesn't make sense though still - I reckon they may be heading for an all might c&&k-up - BE extremely funny if it happens The SFA rules state that Notwithstanding the foregoing provision,a professional Player who has failed to find employment during a registration periodmay sign and be registered for a Club outwith the Registration Periods. I'm struggling to see how they can be said to have failed to find employment when they are being used in promotional material and being played this early in the pre season. They may play them as trialists as is within the rules - it will be very interesting to see if they manage to actually register them come the 1st september as they don't seem to meet the criteria. If rangers have made any payment to them outside expenses then they are clearly in employment in a registration periodThe rangers. Link to comment
Iraq_Red Posted July 11, 2013 Share Posted July 11, 2013 Hey Tup, have you been on the BBC website, giving the followers of Sevco what for? Link to comment
caledonia Posted July 11, 2013 Share Posted July 11, 2013 I also saw him on the doncaster thread on the BBC 1 Link to comment
tutankamun Posted July 11, 2013 Share Posted July 11, 2013 Also on the BBC 'SPL' page: Yes, a story about Partick Thistle & Dundee Utd making history by competing in the first ever SPFL match, comes under the headline of 'Rangers' for some reason. WTF? Although to be fair, the zombies are given a mention in the 3rd paragraph... for some reason. Link to comment
dervish Posted July 12, 2013 Share Posted July 12, 2013 Seeing some stuff on FB about the 'glorious twelfth'... so glad they are gone. Sun is shining, it's Friday and they are dead. Link to comment
tightbreeks Posted July 12, 2013 Share Posted July 12, 2013 you read about sevco's new signings as if it is the huns 10 years ago. until you read about where they just played, Ipswich and the mighty southend utd. the guillibilest guillible spastics in the world, with absolutely nothing else to live for in their vile existence. Link to comment
tup Posted July 12, 2013 Share Posted July 12, 2013 Yes I have been on BBC site, got a bit of grief for my opinion, gave it back in spades. Result? Comments deleted en masse. Fuck the huns. Link to comment
Ingolfsson Posted July 13, 2013 Share Posted July 13, 2013 Hun MP injured by huns http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-23299768 1 Link to comment
Huntlysheep Posted July 13, 2013 Share Posted July 13, 2013 Hun MP injured by huns http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-23299768Minkers the lot o the cunts. Link to comment
BrianFaePerth Posted July 13, 2013 Share Posted July 13, 2013 Caught the end of SSN interviewing Sally. Fuckin hell, talk about fawning over him, wishing "Rangers", whoever the fuck they are, all the best for their campaign etc Link to comment
Mouse Posted July 15, 2013 Share Posted July 15, 2013 Minkers the lot o the cunts.Carpet bomb the lot of them 1 Link to comment
lazio_don Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 Carpet bomb the lot of themSome napalm from above would soon sort out the problem of those knuckle dragging hun loving ulster bigots. Link to comment
dervish Posted July 16, 2013 Share Posted July 16, 2013 Some napalm from above would soon sort out the problem of those knuckle dragging hun loving ulster bigots. Real orange men then. Link to comment
The Boofon Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 There's a shock. http://www.scotsman.com/sport/football/sfl-division-three/rangers-sfa-to-make-no-further-ibrox-probe-1-3003679 THE SFA have told Rangers the rangers that the ruling body won’t be launching a further enquiry into last year’s takeover of the club by the consortium fronted by Charles Green.Revelations of taped conversations between discredited former owner Craig Whyte with Green and business partner Imran Ahmad prompted then chairman Malcolm Murray to commission an independent investigation of that buy-out by law firm Pinsent Mason.Although their report cleared Green (who stood down as chief executive in April) and Ahmad (removed as finance director at Ibrox the same month) SFA CEO Stewart Regan claimed in May that they may launch their own investigation. “We have asked a number of specific questions relating to what went on in the period leading up to liquidation and the period surrounding the transfer of membership,” he said. “There are some very specific questions we have asked that require some very specific answers. If we don’t get those answers, we reserve the right to further investigation.“The nature of the questions we have asked relate to the links between Green, Ahmad and Whyte, the details surrounding money that was lodged in Ahmad’s mother’s bank account and various conversations that allegedly took place.”However, it emerged last night that the SFA have decided that there is no case for Green and Ahmad to answer. On the basis of the evidence they have seen from the Pinsent Mason findings, they have ruled that there is no requirement for the issue to be referred to compliance officer Vincent Lunny. Link to comment
tup Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 Not corrupt at all then, phew, I'm totally reassured now, thanks SFA, worry over. Link to comment
dervish Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 I fully expected them to do SFA about it. On a plus point the Sevco lost 15% today. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now