robbojunior Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Are you a toe wrestler? No I was like a whippet on the fitba field so defenders kept standing on my toes as i knocked the ball past them. Link to comment
The Hulk Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 I'm saying at 22 he should be in better physical condition than Robson and pushing him and others round him far more than he is. He doesn't even get a game over Cammy Smith these days. You've got a point but credit has to be given to the players ahead of him for performing so well. The player's position he should be targeting is that of Flood or maybe even Jack, not Robson. Robson is a Rolls-Royce of a player. Everyone has been talking of Reynolds and Pawlett for player of the year, but for me Robson is the heartbeat of this team. He is technically the best player in the current Aberdeen squad and probably the best footballer we've had since Jamie Smith, or Eoin Jess before him. And one final point on Robson. He didn't play in the SPL at all until he was nearly 25. In other words he was a slow developer... Nicky Low is our Nicky Butt. Link to comment
TwoStars Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Never been amazed by Low and at 22 he's running out of excuses for not impressing. That said, still shit if he's broken his leg or otherwise got a serious injury, in particular just a few months before the end of his contract. Still, now we can release him without feeling bad.According to Barassie you both don't know a lot. Link to comment
TwoStars Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 You've got a point but credit has to be given to the players ahead of him for performing so well. The player's position he should be targeting is that of Flood or maybe even Jack, not Robson. Robson is a Rolls-Royce of a player. Everyone has been talking of Reynolds and Pawlett for player of the year, but for me Robson is the heartbeat of this team. He is technically the best player in the current Aberdeen squad and probably the best footballer we've had since Jamie Smith, or Eoin Jess before him..Completely agree. Link to comment
Redstar Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 A broken toe shouldn't stop him playing if needed...strap it to the toe next to it and a pain killing injection should be good enough... Link to comment
Tord31 Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Max 6 weeks out i'd say (should be less) so full time for rehab under existing contract I would like him to stay on but wouldn't be surprised if Mcinnes looks to masson/storie who both have contracts in place to cover his limited minutes and spend the money elsewhere. Link to comment
TwoStars Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Max 6 weeks out i'd say (should be less) so full time for rehab under existing contractI would like him to stay on but wouldn't be surprised if Mcinnes looks to masson/storie who both have contracts in place to cover his limited minutes and spend the money elsewhere.Masson was on loan at Elgin until he got injured I think... Link to comment
Tord31 Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Yea he is on a six month loan deal. Back in Elgin team now after recovering from injury. Probably doesn't have a long long term future at the club but makes little sense paying him off (ala Jordan Brown and Stephen Hughes last summer), giving Low a new deal and then only playing him 6 times or something. If he is going to be a serious player for us next season by all means give him a new contract but if he is just being considered for making up the numbers role again then perhaps your looking to use the money better elsewhere and utilise others more like Masson. Link to comment
fine-n-dandy Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Nicky Low, Nicky Low, Nicky Low. How's yer toe? How's yer toe? How's yer toe? He is only 22 & from what I've seen of him he's been a lot better than Fraser Fyvie was for example.He didn't get in our midfield last season because of the useless cunt Brown trying to stick by his usual shite "experienced signings" in Hughes & Rae.He's being kept out of our current (& much improved) midfield (for the most part) by a very good Flood, a fantastic Robson & a decent Jack. Low is a good player & still has bags of potential & for those banging on about him already being old enough, that is just BS. SOME midfielders make the break through & hold their positions younger than that but not very many & more often than not it's in lesser type sides (barring the odd obvious stars). Defence & Midfield are more often than not where you see players taking longer to stake their claims full time in sides, where as up front & out on the wings you tend to see the more exciting & younger players doing it. Where speed & skills are more apparent & also where they arguably get more protection from refs & more notably they are more excused for making mistakes. Low certainly deserves a new deal. Him & the likes of Smith are our future stars unless even better are coming along behind them from the youth system but it will take time before they can be expected to oust the very experienced & very good pros like Flood & Robson. New deal & loan him out next season. Do not want to lose him. Link to comment
fine-n-dandy Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Then what was his excuse last year? Or the season before? Barry Robson is 35 years old ffs and yes, he's good but he's no world beater. Nicky Low is 22 years old ffs, he should be at his physical peak and be well established by now.The useless cunt that was managing us that insisted on playing shite like Hughes & Rae in midfield.Oh & the fact that he was (like many young players that aren't quite ready) out on loan. Physical peak at 22? were you? I was nearer 25 before my physical peak (& that's pretty average I'd say) but people are very different. Name me all these midfield players that were at their physical peak & ESTABLISHED after just turning 22 please. I can think of a few like Scholes but even he didn't start until he was 20+ & established (sort of) at 21 but then only as back up. In 1995–96, after Mark Hughes moved to Chelsea, Scholes had more first-team opportunities, standing in for the suspended Eric Cantona as Andrew Cole's strike partner for the first two months of the campaign. Scholes (now wearing the number 22 shirt) scored fourteen goals in all competitions as United became the first English team to win the double twice. He picked up another Premier League winners medal in 1996–97 – in this season he changed his shirt number to 18, which he held for the next 15 years. Other exceptions are the likes of James McCarthy but these are rare (at such a young age). Every star player was not a star by time they were 20 ffs. Link to comment
vanderark14 Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 If you don't have anything to add, why say anything at all? I'm saying at 22 he should be in better physical condition than Robson and pushing him and others round him far more than he is. He doesn't even get a game over Cammy Smith these days. Peter Pawlett up until this season was shite for us, he is 23 years old. Until this year his physical condition was poor and just like that he in with a shout for AFC player of the year Low has potential and should be given a chance 1 Link to comment
barassie_afc Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 This was my point, peak at 22? Ronaldo certainly wasnt at his peak (Not comparing him to Ronaldo). One of the reasons I like Low is he isnt afraid of the ball and appears to be a decent passer, I think he offers more than Jack. Link to comment
fine-n-dandy Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Peter Pawlett up until this season was shite for us, he is 23 years old. Until this year his physical condition was poor and just like that he in with a shout for AFC player of the year Low has potential and should be given a chanceYou don't know what you are talking about.Physical peak should be at 22 Link to comment
robbojunior Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 You don't know what you are talking about.Physical peak should be at 22 You are talking out of your arse. Biggest load of shite i've ever heard. There is no singular physical peak for the entire human race. Link to comment
dervish Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 No he's right actually. 22 and 3 months is the peak time. I couldn't say the week or day, that would be unreasonable, but that's just fact. Link to comment
robbojunior Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 No he's right actually. 22 and 3 months is the peak time. I couldn't say the week or day, that would be unreasonable, but that's just fact. haha apologies, you're right. I thought he was talking about sexual peak. Which of course everyone knows is 13 Link to comment
dervish Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Well at least for a Capricorn like Nicky. Link to comment
fine-n-dandy Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Physical peak at 22? were you? I was nearer 25 before my physical peak (& that's pretty average I'd say) but people are very different. Name me all these midfield players that were at their physical peak & ESTABLISHED after just turning 22 please. I can think of a few like Scholes but even he didn't start until he was 20+ & established (sort of) at 21 but then only as back up. Every star player was not a star by time they were 20 ffs. Peter Pawlett up until this season was shite for us, he is 23 years old. Until this year his physical condition was poor and just like that he in with a shout for AFC player of the year Low has potential and should be given a chance You don't know what you are talking about.Physical peak should be at 22Forgot to add smiley for the slow ones You are talking out of your arse. Biggest load of shite i've ever heard. There is no singular physical peak for the entire human race.Ooops! Link to comment
RowieMan Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Physical Peak?!? When talking about Nicky Low is totally irelevant. Aberdeen have let many a good player go for not being big enough, strong enough or fast enough. Forget all that nonsense, this is a player who has a good touch, a pass, and isnt afraid to get stuck in. He will never be paul scholes, but by the logic of some scholes would have been binned at 22 for being slow, unable to tackle and not strong enough. Josh Magennis is fast, strong and gets stuck in, but in all honesty he isn't a good enough footballer for aberdeen. Let's not criticise Low for not being more like big josh! Link to comment
fine-n-dandy Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 I don't think Willo Flood has reached his physical peak yet but all those years in the concentration camp in Dundee probably hindered him a bit.That's something to look forward to. We'll have one hell of a player on our hands then. Link to comment
TwoStars Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Peter Pawlett up until this season was shite for us, he is 23 years old. Until this year his physical condition was poor and just like that he in with a shout for AFC player of the year Low has potential and should be given a chancePawletts physical condition is still questionable. Link to comment
TwoStars Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 So we've had Paul Scholes, Ronaldo, Mark Hughes. Any other ridiculous comparisons? The fact of the matter remains. He is 22 and still not deemed good enough to get in the team. Goodbye Nicky Low... Link to comment
Tommy Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 So we've had Paul Scholes, Ronaldo, Mark Hughes. Any other ridiculous comparisons?The fact of the matter remains. He is 22 and still not deemed good enough to get in the team.Goodbye Nicky Low...I'd give him another year.When McInnes came in he barely saw Low playing and took in Robson and Flood.He was unlikely not to play them and Low and other youngsters were going to suffer.Assuming Robson gets a deal it's obvious he won't be playing every game and abit of continuity with Low stepping in would be no bad thing.He can only learn more by playing more often and being educated by Robson would help. Link to comment
TwoStars Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 I'd give him another year.When McInnes came in he barely saw Low playing and took in Robson and Flood.He was unlikely not to play them and Low and other youngsters were going to suffer.Assuming Robson gets a deal it's obvious he won't be playing every game and abit of continuity with Low stepping in would be no bad thing.He can only learn more by playing more often and being educated by Robson would help.He's not a bad player. Can't say that. But is he good enough? Big shoes to fill in Barry Robson. Link to comment
Tommy Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 He's not a bad player. Can't say that. But is he good enough?Big shoes to fill in Barry Robson.It's McInnes's shout but we haven't got a big enough squad as it is, I see nothing wrongwith a one year deal because he really hasn't had a decent run in the team and if a newplayer was signed he's unlikely to be taking either Robson or Floods starting place.If Low is happy being part of the squad and grasps his chance then I'm happy with that. Link to comment
dervish Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Physical Peak?!? When talking about Nicky Low is totally irelevant. Aberdeen have let many a good player go for not being big enough, strong enough or fast enough. Forget all that nonsense, this is a player who has a good touch, a pass, and isnt afraid to get stuck in. He will never be paul scholes, but by the logic of some scholes would have been binned at 22 for being slow, unable to tackle and not strong enough. Josh Magennis is fast, strong and gets stuck in, but in all honesty he isn't a good enough footballer for aberdeen. Let's not criticise Low for not being more like big josh! Correct answer! Link to comment
fine-n-dandy Posted April 23, 2014 Share Posted April 23, 2014 Pawletts physical condition is still questionable. PAP! So we've had Paul Scholes, Ronaldo, Mark Hughes. Any other ridiculous comparisons? The fact of the matter remains. He is 22 and still not deemed good enough to get in the team. Goodbye Nicky Low...Nobody is comparing their playing abilities to these players.They are being used as examples as their reaching their "physical peak" at 22 but you just try & twist it around to deflect from what you said. Link to comment
TwoStars Posted April 24, 2014 Share Posted April 24, 2014 PAP! Nobody is comparing their playing abilities to these players.They are being used as examples as their reaching their "physical peak" at 22 but you just try & twist it around to deflect from what you said.Selective reading? You said we played Livngston 17 times in one season in another thread Link to comment
ChutneyLove Posted April 24, 2014 Share Posted April 24, 2014 Nicky Low needs to toe-the-line or he is in danger of becoming just another digit. Link to comment
CalgaryDon Posted April 24, 2014 Share Posted April 24, 2014 Feel Low should be moved on at the end of the season. It's a shame he has been injured and will miss the end of what has been a fantastic season. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now