Shafted By Appeal Tribunal

[ebbe]

The panel and Thompson can go fuck themselves, their decision here is almost laughable, and the victims are moaning of conspiracy too?! There is not an argument in the world that Hayes' tackle was a straight red, it's not even a foul. Some seriously despicable pricks at the SFA, aye more than usual.

[Redstar]

I would imagine that in this case, it is perhaps the speed that which Hayes goes into the challenge, in a crunch-like manner, that Thomson has deemed worthy of using excessive force (given the distance he is from the ball, the distance he is from Lustig, the position of their respective bodies too). The panel will have understood this,

I agree...all the noise that's been made about the Luke Shaw leg break just now...what with the boy who committed the deed not even getting booked...they are similar tackles...fair but hard...if they overturned the red it would look bad given the going on's in the past week...IMHO.

 

Van Gaal not sparing Shaw's blushes...fucking crying?...really?

 

"It is awful. It was a very bad tackle. He had the oxygen mask on and was crying in the dressing room," said manager Louis van Gaal.

[E-P-K]

I agree...all the noise that's been made about the Luke Shaw leg break just now...what with the boy who committed the deed not even getting booked...they are similar tackles...fair but hard...if they overturned the red it would look bad given the going on's in the past week...IMHO.

 

Van Gaal not sparing Shaw's blushes...fucking crying?...really?

 

"It is awful. It was a very bad tackle. He had the oxygen mask on and was crying in the dressing room," said manager Louis van Gaal.

 

 

The lad who made the tackle, got the MOTM award, and Roy Keane today said it was a fantastic tackle, or words to that.

[chaos_defrost]

Aberdeen 5 points top of the league, we were never going to win that appeal and it was the best tackle in the whole match.

[tup]

Should have been a yellow card for the tackle but we just have to take it on the chin, it's hardly a massive injustice as some folk above who don't seem in full control of their emotions are suggesting.

 

Red was harsh but not entirely unexpected when you see Lustigs reaction, that more than anything made up the refs mind.

[fine-n-dandy]

Should have been a yellow card for the tackle but we just have to take it on the chin, it's hardly a massive injustice as some folk above who don't seem in full control of their emotions are suggesting.

 

Red was harsh but not entirely unexpected when you see Lustigs reaction, that more than anything made up the refs mind.

Nobody is really questioning the refs (spur of moment) decision though.

Just questioning the idiotic tribunal panels spineless fear of doing the right thing rather than bending over to the hordes

[tup]

If I thought it was a yellow then a weegie panel would say red.

 

Not surprising at all.

[muttonhumper]

What a fucking joke.

[the_shrimp]

We'll still win our next two matches.

[fine-n-dandy]

We'll still win our next two matches.

Will feel all the better knowing our weakened side has beaten Hearts & shut the cunts up for a while. At least until their following league game when the pump Celtic.

 

Not worried about the Hibs game in the slightest but the Hearts game is going to be a real cracker I hope

[ChutneyLove]

Was like an apartheid era South African darkie looking for a decision from a judge. Wasn't happening.

[CraigHill]

Wasn't even a fucking foul.

[ChutneyLove]

Wasn't even a fucking fowl.

Panel were chickens.

[fifered]

Just like when he was sent off, the squad and mcinnes should use the injustice as motivation. Get out there and blow the jambo cunts away without hayes.

[fine-n-dandy]

Wasn't even a fucking fowl.

Pretty sure if it was he'd have gotten a jail sentence rather than a two game ban.

[ebbe]

If I thought it was a yellow then a weegie panel would say red.

Not surprising at all.

Explain why it was a yellow. Ball won cleanly, both feet on the ground and on the follow through he's even pulled he's feet in.

[caledonia]

Explain why it was a yellow. Ball won cleanly, both feet on the ground and on the follow through he's even pulled he's feet in.

corrupt bastards the lot of them

[Chewie37]

It's because of the new guidelines where it's all to do with control and danger. Lustig making out that he'd been shot by a bazooka made the ref think it was dangerous. Pretty rubbish but that's the new rules i.e. Let's make it a non contact sport

[The Boofon]

Panel were chickens.

 

Hayes being hauled before the beak was always going to result in a ban.

 

Going off pun for a moment have they made their decision for why it wasn't overturned public?

[tup]

Explain why it was a yellow. Ball won cleanly, both feet on the ground and on the follow through he's even pulled he's feet in.

The way he launched into the tackle was slightly reckless.

 

It's not worth arguing about and outrage will make no difference. He's banned and that's it.

[ebbe]

The way he launched into the tackle was slightly reckless.

It's not worth arguing about and outrage will make no difference. He's banned and that's it.

That's the thing though, he hasn't launched in to anything. He's slid in and clearly won the ball, which is perfectly legal.

 

I know it makes no difference, but if something's wrong I call it as such. Like you saying it's a yellow, or the SFA deeming it a 2 game ban offence. Unless you ban contact in football this decision is scandalous.

[Mikeyboy1903]

Dons vs Glasgow ... Never in a million years was it going to be overturned.

 

My question is, Appealing that decision did that give him 2 games instead of 1 ?

[tup]

It was 50/50 in my opinion and should have been downgraded to a yellow but we just have to take it on the chin, we have had much bigger injustices than that in the past.

[oilcat]

This could galvanise the side even more though...siege mentality in the pre match team talk.....Deek will use this to our advantage

 

Doesnt change the fact that its a shite decision though

[RAZOR]

I agree...all the noise that's been made about the Luke Shaw leg break just now...what with the boy who committed the deed not even getting booked...they are similar tackles...fair but hard...if they overturned the red it would look bad given the going on's in the past week...IMHO.

 

Van Gaal not sparing Shaw's blushes...fucking crying?...really?

 

"It is awful. It was a very bad tackle. He had the oxygen mask on and was crying in the dressing room," said manager Louis van Gaal.

 

What a load of garbage. Take this Man Utd shite somewhere else.

 

I can suggest the Monkey House.

[Henry]

Dons vs Glasgow ... Never in a million years was it going to be overturned.

 

My question is, Appealing that decision did that give him 2 games instead of 1 ?

 

I think it was always two.

[Nelly]

even though he won the ball fairly, because of his pace they'll have considered it a dangerous tackle. Not sure how he's meant to slow up before tackling though?

 

It's just a case of the SFA backing their ref. Must be embarrassing for them the amount of cards that get rescinded these days, it's almost as if they're trying to convince us that their ref's are competent.

[The Boofon]

It's shite but we'll have players out for games all season so should be able to cope without Hayes for a couple. I'd be more concerned if it was Danny Ward or Rooney missing.

[ZeroTolerance]

Talk of "it should have been a yellow" is havering. If it was a foul then it was a red the speed he came in at.

 

However, given that it wasn't actually a foul given then it should have been overturned.

 

I think other posters are right that the bias in these appeals is not really about Glasgow bias, it's more institutional bias to cover the blushes of their referees by almost never ruling against them.

[tup]

Talk of "it should have been a yellow" is havering. If it was a foul then it was a red the speed he came in at.

However, given that it wasn't actually a foul given then it should have been overturned.

I think other posters are right that the bias in these appeals is not really about Glasgow bias, it's more institutional bias to cover the blushes of their referees by almost never ruling against them.

That's not really accurate as they have overturned the last 3 reds by Collum.