Scottish Cup 2021/22

[aberdeen1970]

Weve rolled over to Motherwell every time. 

The second half at Pittodrie being the most pitiful and weak 45 minutes of the entire Glass 'reign' 

[starryfish]

4 minutes ago, aberdeen1970 said:

Imagine having a striker that can run in behind at the club 

Exactly what I thought when I saw the second Hibs goal, potentially in our squad only Vicente capable of that.

[Zeus]

8 minutes ago, starryfish said:

Exactly what I thought when I saw the second Hibs goal, potentially in our squad only Vicente capable of that.

JET 

[WesthillWanderersFC]

10 minutes ago, Ten Caat said:

Maybe we might have if they had a player sent off after 55 seconds?

We’ve been bullied & not given it back, and we’ve also had weak referees. How Van Veen has stayed on in two of our games I have no idea 

[Jigsaw666]

They've done well to get a goal back but Collum destroyed this game in under a minute which even for him is some going. 

[Tommy]

19 minutes ago, milne_afc said:

Looks like they’ve signed a decent talent from Bobo Glimp. Two good goals 

Aye, he looks decent.

[Schapenneuker]

As much as I hate Hibs, and as much as Porteous is the most detestable footballer in Scotland, I had a wee chuckle at Motherwell going out of the cup because of their own hammer throwing stupidity. 

 

[Ten Caat]

Probably the best result for football in general....the Edinburgh sides can both beat either arse cheek on any given day.

[WesthillWanderersFC]

1 hour ago, Schapenneuker said:

As much as I hate Hibs, and as much as Porteous is the most detestable footballer in Scotland, I had a wee chuckle at Motherwell going out of the cup because of their own hammer throwing stupidity. 

 

I agree but thought it laughable that the Hibs player most outraged by the bad tackle was Porteous.

He’s a horrible cunt.

And he hits women. So a cowardly cunt too.

A double leg break next week would be pleasing. 

[shut up meg]

1 hour ago, Ten Caat said:

Probably the best result for football in general....the Edinburgh sides can both beat either arse cheek on any given day.

Rangers V Hibs Saturday 

Hearts v Celtic Sunday

 

Premier Sports advertising team will follow BT Sports lead

RANGERS v Hibs

CELTIC v Hearts

[shut up meg]

Dundee 0-2, 

Tavenier - Penalty, would you believe it.

Never saw it, but I'm going with soft.

[shut up meg]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/live/football/60653651?ns_mchannel=social&ns_source=twitter&ns_campaign=bbc_live&ns_linkname=622e1adf0ce87e491a0ef693%26'Tavernier blocked'%262022-03-13T16%3A26%3A51.058Z&ns_fee=0&pinned_post_locator=urn:asset:e7dcc931-f68c-46b0-bf24-e875de1d373f&pinned_post_asset_id=622e1adf0ce87e491a0ef693&pinned_post_type=share

Colin Hendry thinks it was soft and he's a hun cunt

[WesthillWanderersFC]

17 minutes ago, shut up meg said:

Dundee 0-2, 

Tavenier - Penalty, would you believe it.

Never saw it, but I'm going with soft.

Steven McLean is the referee. 
A known hun
Only in Scotland 

 

[Guest milne_afc]

It’s softer than the pen awarded to the Huns in the 89 skol cup final. Blatant cheating from McLean 

[Millertime]

On 1/27/2022 at 12:25 PM, Henry said:

I see the TV games have been announced 

Huns and tims on Premier as you would expect 

Peterhead vs Dundee, and Arbroath Hibs on Beeb. 

Absolutely yep

More potential subscribers, so exactly what you would expect 

[WesthillWanderersFC]

6 minutes ago, Millertime said:

Absolutely yep

More potential subscribers, so exactly what you would expect 

Just took you 6 weeks to get the fishing rod out FFS ?

[shut up meg]

1 hour ago, milne_afc said:

It’s softer than the pen awarded to the Huns in the 89 skol cup final. Blatant cheating from McLean 

It'll even itself out, Celtic will get a soft pen at Tannadice tomorrow night.

[WesthillWanderersFC]

5 minutes ago, shut up meg said:

It'll even itself out, Celtic will get a soft pen at Tannadice tomorrow night.

I doubt it.

That fat hun bastard John Beaton is refereeing 

[Dynamo]

Pure stupidity from Mugabe, but Collum couldn't wait to get his card out. Didn't give himself a moment to think about it. Have seen those types of fouls not given as a red (like the boy Roberts 10 minutes later...).

[redone]

26 minutes ago, Roberto said:

I thought it was a red in all honesty.

Agreed , but the problem is the lack of consistency.

Not just by Collum himself , as shown by the similar foul 5 minutes later.  But by refs in general.   We’ve seen plenty other fouls like these ...... sometimes they get a red , sometimes a yellow. 

One thing’s fuckin guaranteed though......if that tackle was in a game between the arse-cheeks, it wouldn’t be a red card , and probably not even a yellow , especially that early in the game. 

 

 

[Broken_Glass]

Just watched it - initial reaction was red however when you see it again its never a red for me. 

Wasn't two footed, wasn't high. Yellow card would have sufficed.

Just more shit refereeing which isn't surprising given the shocking standard and decisions we've already seen this year.

[Poodler]

Just seen that penalty ????

[RUL]

1 hour ago, Dynamo said:

Pure stupidity from Mugabe, but Collum couldn't wait to get his card out. Didn't give himself a moment to think about it. Have seen those types of fouls not given as a red (like the boy Roberts 10 minutes later...).

To be honest I thought they were both reds?

[Ten Caat]

1 hour ago, Broken_Glass said:

Just watched it - initial reaction was red however when you see it again its never a red for me. 

Wasn't two footed, wasn't high. Yellow card would have sufficed.

Just more shit refereeing which isn't surprising given the shocking standard and decisions we've already seen this year.

By the letter of the law it was a red. As was the one 5 minutes later. 

I reckon most refs in Scotland would have shat out the first one as it was so early in the match and given a yellow......if questioned later claiming they had their view partially obstructed. Although if we had VAR they would have been corrected sharpish and would have had no choice but to upgrade to a red. 

Collum made a tit of himself by shiting out of giving a red for the second offence which was absolutely identical. And where he absolutely could not claim his view was obstructed. 

[Broken_Glass]

39 minutes ago, Ten Caat said:

By the letter of the law it was a red. As was the one 5 minutes later. 

I reckon most refs in Scotland would have shat out the first one as it was so early in the match and given a yellow......if questioned later claiming they had their view partially obstructed. Although if we had VAR they would have been corrected sharpish and would have had no choice but to upgrade to a red. 

Collum made a tit of himself by shiting out of giving a red for the second offence which was absolutely identical. And where he absolutely could not claim his view was obstructed. 

Sorry Mr always correct. 

Will remember to consult you in future prior to giving my opinion on a football forum.

[Dynamo]

3 hours ago, RUL said:

To be honest I thought they were both reds?

Exactly. How can one be red and not the other? 

[WesthillWanderersFC]

4 hours ago, Broken_Glass said:

Just watched it - initial reaction was red however when you see it again its never a red for me. 

Wasn't two footed, wasn't high. Yellow card would have sufficed.

Just more shit refereeing which isn't surprising given the shocking standard and decisions we've already seen this year.

Doesn’t have to be two footed to be red.

Doesn’t have to be high to be a red.

Where does it say that in the laws of football? To save you the bother, it doesn’t. 

“Endangering an opponent” justifies Collum’s decision. 
Being consistent, he should’ve red carded the 2nd tackle too just 5 minutes later. 

[Ten Caat]

2 hours ago, Broken_Glass said:

Sorry Mr always correct. 

Will remember to consult you in future prior to giving my opinion on a football forum.

I'm correct on this one

But yes, consult me first. Should limit the amount of keech you post

[Tommy]

The huns songbook was full of their anti Catholicism and nothing will get done.

See if they were coming out with anti blacks or even misogynist would action be taken?

[Broken_Glass]

1 hour ago, WesthillWanderersFC said:

Doesn’t have to be two footed to be red.

Doesn’t have to be high to be a red.

Where does it say that in the laws of football? To save you the bother, it doesn’t. 

“Endangering an opponent” justifies Collum’s decision. 
Being consistent, he should’ve red carded the 2nd tackle too just 5 minutes later. 

Where did it endanger the player he took the ball not the player. Open interpretation.