Jump to content

Sevco Thread


Recommended Posts


The mass delusion of the mainstream Scottish media would put the Stasi to shame.

 

That thing in the second division, whatever it is, its not fucking Rangers.

 

It's very odd, all right.

 

Rangers were liquidated. They died.

 

Our Club Chairmen voted on whether a NEWCO should be allowed to play in the top flight. Has all of this just been forgotten?

 

Just because this new club and it's fans stamped it's feet and demanded they were Rangers does not make it the slightest bit true.

 

The mainstream media and the hun bastards that have attached themselves to this shambolic tribute act should be reminded time and again they are not Rangers :)

 

 

 

rip-rangers.jpg

Link to comment

Hearing McCoist is pretty much gone

Also wages aren't being paid

 

Yup it's that time again ....

 

Tick Tock .....

 

Well that is terrible news!!!!!!!! :)

 

Heres hoping that is right, we really owe The Rangers for all the laughs they have given us over the last 18 months :giggle:

Link to comment

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2385177/Rangers-owner-Charles-Green-blasted-John-Brown.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

 

It's quite ironic that the only 'rangers man' who actually had the intelligence (?) to see through green at the time (even though it was plain to everyone else he was at it) was to dim witted to put forward his case in any other way than a drunken rant. Again at it in this article. Still going on about the deeds. You know it's a shambles when this guy represents the voice of hope and clarity amongst your support.

 

If you were Dundee fan right now... how pissed off would you be?

 

Focus on the team that pays you you stupid one-note bastard.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment

It's very odd, all right.

 

Rangers were liquidated. They died.

 

Our Club Chairmen voted on whether a NEWCO should be allowed to play in the top flight. Has all of this just been forgotten?

 

Just because this new club and it's fans stamped it's feet and demanded they were Rangers does not make it the slightest bit true.

 

The mainstream media and the hun bastards that have attached themselves to this shambolic tribute act should be reminded time and again they are not Rangers :)

 

 

 

rip-rangers.jpg

 

I've got a copy of this which I take out and look at when times are low, just to cheer myself up. "Can't be so bad, Rangers are dead." that's also the issue that has Traynor saying they don't exist anymore in it. Thinking of getting it laminated cos I don't want it to get ruined if for example the pages get stuck to together.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment

It's not as clear-cut as simply saying that they're not the same old club. I know we all want that to be true but there's a snag...

 

The oldco was liquidated… fact. However, under a daft sleight of hand practiced by the SFA, ‘Rangers’ were ‘allowed’ to keep their name, history and identity. This is of course completely unprecedented, and we all know that it doesn't make any sense, but unfortunately it does also mean that Rangers fans are quite correct to state that they are the same club… because, under the SFA’s own rules, they are.

 

So the correct answer to the question ‘are they the same club’ is, confusingly, yes and no simultaneously.

 

It would have been much easier for everyone concerned, including ‘Rangers’ fans themselves, if this situation had never arisen and the new club had formed and just been told to get on with it; that way there would have been no ambiguity, and I for one would even have been fairly relaxed about them enjoying an emotional (as opposed to official) claim on the historic achievements of the old club provided that they acknowledged that they're different (in much the same way as Airdrie UTD fans claim the history of Airdrionians, for example, without anyone batting an eyelid).

 

No-one really cares, ultimately, about the legal niceties of the situation, but the way in which they have been 'allowed' to continue being the same thing is just plain weird.

  • Downvote 2
Link to comment

Hearing McCoist is pretty much gone

Also wages aren't being paid

 

Yup it's that time again ....

 

Tick Tock .....

BBC reporting that they took 200k from a charity match with Milan and put it into the club and not to charity. The charity commission complained. Desperate times...
Link to comment

I hope your sources are right (again) because that is beautiful if true.

 

 

As always bud ... Would never post.....

 

What's interesting was last night that THE Rangers fans were outside Ibrox again and Traynor got pelters, Obviously they know something is up, and from last time ... When Smith "walked away " the first time ... it went tits up.

Link to comment

So anyone who bought the assets of "Rangers" even though a completely new entity could still claim their history/titles? Or only if they made their name sound like the old company? So for example if we had all clubbed together and bought "Rangers" we could just tack it on to the rest of our history and claim the titles etc?

Link to comment

BBC reporting that they took 200k from a charity match with Milan and put it into the club and not to charity. The charity commission complained. Desperate times...

 

 

That would be the 7 Million that's currently owed and costs are still rising, They still haven't published there accounts yet .... The smokescreen can only last for so long.

 

Since everything is joined at the hip now, What happens if Rangers go into Administration again ... Answers on a postcard folks ...

Link to comment

dont agree there is any rule in place to say they are the same.

 

Liquidation is clear cut, no ambiguity exists in reality.

 

Only corrupt bigots would argue otherwise.

 

Correct - there isn't!

 

The SFA invented a rule to allow them to continue as the same club. It doesn't make any fucking sense at all, but as it is the SFA's 'game', what they say goes.

 

It's a bit like screaming at the referee that it isn't a penalty, but unfortunately, if he points at the spot then it's a penalty, end of, and trying to point out that the offence was committed five yards outside the box isn't going to change things.

Link to comment

Correct - there isn't!

 

The SFA invented a rule to allow them to continue as the same club. It doesn't make any fucking sense at all, but as it is the SFA's 'game', what they say goes.

 

It's a bit like screaming at the referee that it isn't a penalty, but unfortunately, if he points at the spot then it's a penalty, end of, and trying to point out that the offence was committed five yards outside the box isn't going to change things.

It only goes if you are a hun lovin fuck.

Anybody who is anybody knows they died.

Link to comment

Fair enough but we've seen plenty evidence of the level of rule bending or corruption the SFA were prepared to stoop to so I'd take anything they proclaim with a large dose of salt.

 

Scotland is corrupt but a lot of its citizens are not fooled, only the neanderthal element buy it for real.

Link to comment

 

 

That would be the 7 Million that's currently owed and costs are still rising, They still haven't published there accounts yet .... The smokescreen can only last for so long.

 

Since everything is joined at the hip now, What happens if Rangers go into Administration again ... Answers on a postcard folks ...

With the new pyramid structure they could always restart in amongst all the junior teams and work their way back up. It's all about sporting integrity after all!
Link to comment

Well, if they are so desperate to be the same Club I don't expect to hear any complaints from the hun hordes when they are slapped with a 25 point deduction for going into administration.

 

Dundee received -25 points for going into admin for a second time and we all the know the huns insist that everyone is treated the same.

 

Lets seem them splutter their way through that one when it comes up :crossfingers::lolrangers:

Link to comment

That would be the 7 Million that's currently owed and costs are still rising, They still haven't published there accounts yet .... The smokescreen can only last for so long.

 

Since everything is joined at the hip now, What happens if Rangers go into Administration again ... Answers on a postcard folks ...

 

Couldn't we just drop them back down to the fourth tier again?

 

That would be hilarious. Keep them yo-yoing between the bottom two divisions in perpetuity. I can think of no more deserving a bunch.

 

Edited for retardedness: third tier? Ooops...

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...