CityCentre Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 There is a lot of different rumours surrounding Ryan Fraser's sell-on clause that we have with Bournemouth. Is there any concrete evidence of what exactly it is and what we would be due if he was sold this summer? Link to comment
BWG Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 It's 40% and a feel of India Taylor's tits. 1 Link to comment
BitWait Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 Not a clue except rumours on here , not seen anything concrete like you say. Anybody ITK ? Link to comment
Yorston Vasey Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 The Santa Clause 3 was a ridiculous film, Tim Allen must have completely lost the plot if this is his fourth installment. 2 Link to comment
GDON21 Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 Not a clue except rumours on here , not seen anything concrete like you say. Anybody ITK ? Richard Gordon was adamant it was 25%. I met Duncan Fraser recently at the Scotland Israel game and he was joking about how well Fraser was playing and hopefully he gets sold soon to help us out. Never confirmed any exact figures. Link to comment
BWG Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 Honestly if it is 25% then that's tremendous business by the club given the circumstances. Fair play. Link to comment
Tord31 Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 Richard Gordon was adamant it was 25%. I met Duncan Fraser recently at the Scotland Israel game and he was joking about how well Fraser was playing and hopefully he gets sold soon to help us out. Never confirmed any exact figures.Personally I have not heard him say that but if he said that on the radio then take it as correct. That would be a fair boost when he goes for £25M Link to comment
GDON21 Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 Personally I have not heard him say that but if he said that on the radio then take it as correct. That would be a fair boost when he goes for £25M Said it after the game on sunday. Link to comment
Tord31 Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 long live the crazy money of english football (for 3 more months at least) Link to comment
StandFree1982 Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 If he was English, he'd be going for a hell of a lot more than £25M Link to comment
CityCentre Posted April 16, 2019 Author Share Posted April 16, 2019 Richard Gordon was adamant it was 25%. I met Duncan Fraser recently at the Scotland Israel game and he was joking about how well Fraser was playing and hopefully he gets sold soon to help us out. Never confirmed any exact figures. Assuming he goes for around £30m, hopefully to Arsenal, then we would be in line for around £7m, which would be a game changer for us. Not sure how it would work with installments being paid etc. Link to comment
Scotty_Toronto Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 The Santa Clause 3 was a ridiculous film, Tim Allen must have completely lost the plot if this is his fourth installment. Much of the original (including the finale) was filmed a couple of miles away from me. (Never saw the picture, though.) Link to comment
paddy Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 Much of the original (including the finale) was filmed a couple of miles away from me. (Never saw the picture, though.) Where is Ryan's wallet? 4 Link to comment
Scotty_Toronto Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 Much of the original (including the finale) was filmed a couple of miles away from me. Other side of the tracks, I should add. Link to comment
For Fecks Sake Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 The sell on clause was also mentioned in the recent BBC interview and piece about Ryan Fraser. 25% of perhaps a £25m fee would be tremendous Link to comment
G31DON Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 "it's not a sum of money we ever envisioned coming into the club from Ryan moving on, so we're putting the whole sum into the stadium project. We'll be able to buy a fleet of buses nae bither now." Link to comment
Tord31 Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 There is no reason to increase the playing budget substantially Any money for Fraser, McKenna or Cosgrove will obviously be put to the stadium to reduce the burden on club (mortgage) or fans (share issue) 1 2 Link to comment
NEM Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 There is no reason to increase the playing budget substantially Any money for Fraser, McKenna or Cosgrove will obviously be put to the stadium to reduce the burden on club (mortgage) or fans (share issue) You not been watching us this season? Link to comment
Tord31 Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 You not been watching us this season?We need to spend the money more wisely Mark Reynolds - whats he done this seasonHobanTanseyForresterGleesonWilsonMayGMSStewart Link to comment
BWG Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 Exactly. Giving McInnes any money towards buying in players is much like a man giving his stripper girlfriend the company credit card. No good can come of it. Link to comment
NEM Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 No argument there. We also need to stop wasting money on crocks. An increase in the budget of say £1 million per year might allow us to stop having to take the risk on decent players with a history of injury Link to comment
minijc Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 Minijc will know. #1 ITKSettle doon shitebag 2 2 Link to comment
GDON21 Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 Exactly. Giving McInnes any money towards buying in players is much like a man giving his stripper girlfriend the company credit card. No good can come of it. Totally get that point based on some of the signings made but some of his targets he missed out on have proven to be success, maybe with that extra cash he can get them now. John Marquis - 19 goals in league 1 this season, if we had an extra few quid we could of got him. Christie might of been in the door had we stumped up cash earlier in the window and had that wee bit extra wedge to put towards his wages. No doubt a few more who wouldn't have needed much more money needed to get them in the door. Players he has spent money on so far have definitely been mixed. McLean, Cosgrove, GMS, Ferguson and Devlin all decent. Forrester and May not so good and been the most expensive two. Link to comment
maryhilldon Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 Did we pay a fee for Devlin? Link to comment
CityCentre Posted April 16, 2019 Author Share Posted April 16, 2019 Did we pay a fee for Devlin? Yes, we paid a fee to get him early. Link to comment
Reed or deed Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 Did we pay a fee for Devlin?No, we just closed our eyes and he was there. Link to comment
maryhilldon Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 No, we just closed our eyes and he was there.I thought it was a pre contract. Don't remember a fee unless it was undisclosed. Link to comment
the sheep Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 If you take the limit of the budget out of the equation then Derek was able to identify Maddison before other managers were sniffing about and he brought in Low. We are asking Derek to shop in the bargain basement. Who knows what may be possible with a share of this transfer money. 1 Link to comment
Reed or deed Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 I thought it was a pre contract. Don't remember a fee unless it was undisclosed.I was referring to the Leo sayer ditty of yesteryear, for some reason it came in to my head. Sorry bud, wasna bein sarcastic. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now