Christian Ramirez

[Wee Alickie]

His family are on their way back from the US so he'll be in a good place for the season ahead. 

[zeroisgod76]

10 minutes ago, Wee Alickie said:

His family are on their way back from the US so he'll be in a good place for the season ahead. 

They’re here now, all back home in their house in Westhill. 

[thurso]

I don’t think he’s going anywhere if he was I think he would of left by now so like the rest of the players I think we need to get behind him 

[Kilgore Trout]

21 minutes ago, zeroisgod76 said:

They’re here now, all back home in their house in Westhill. 

Ffs ! you outside in the bushes with your binoculars. You are a nae richter 

[zeroisgod76]

15 minutes ago, Kilgore Trout said:

Ffs ! you outside in the bushes with your binoculars. You are a nae richter 

I live about 50 metres away from them. Saw them out for a walk on my way home from work.  
 

Don’t tar everyone with your brush… perv.

[Kilgore Trout]

2 minutes ago, zeroisgod76 said:

I live about 50 metres away from them. Saw them out for a walk on my way home from work.  
 

Don’t tar everyone with your brush… perv.

Bullshit your diggin about his Missus’ face book page every 5 minutes big chap 

[Kilgore Trout]

4 minutes ago, zeroisgod76 said:

I live about 50 metres away from them. Saw them out for a walk on my way home from work.  
 

Don’t tar everyone with your brush… perv.

Is that how many steps (50) that you have to count in the dark until you are peering in their back window cock in hand ?

 

[zeroisgod76]

2 minutes ago, Kilgore Trout said:

Is that how many steps (50) that you have to count in the dark until you are peering in their back window cock in hand ?

 

Little bit too much detail there… something you have experience of? Pervert!!

[fine-n-dandy]

16 minutes ago, zeroisgod76 said:

I live about 50 metres away from them. Saw them out for a walk on my way home from work.  
 

Don’t tar everyone with your brush… perv.

That the minimum distance stipulated on the injunction? 

[zeroisgod76]

2 minutes ago, fine-n-dandy said:

That the minimum distance stipulated on the injunction? 

It’s where I placed my tent in Carnie Woods.

[fine-n-dandy]

4 minutes ago, zeroisgod76 said:

It’s where I placed my tent in Carnie Woods.

I seen Gazza wondering about with a fishing rod & some KFC & cans in that area

[zeroisgod76]

6 minutes ago, fine-n-dandy said:

I seen Gazza wondering about with a fishing rod & some KFC & cans in that area

Is the alkie hun cunt still alive?

[Kilgore Trout]

23 minutes ago, zeroisgod76 said:

Little bit too much detail there… something you have experience of? Pervert!!

How many pairs of Mrs Rs knickers have you managed to steal off the washing line so far ?  

[fine-n-dandy]

1 minute ago, zeroisgod76 said:

Is the alkie hun cunt still alive?

Fk knows fk cares really ?

[zeroisgod76]

5 minutes ago, Kilgore Trout said:

How many pairs of Mrs Rs knickers have you managed to steal off the washing line so far ?  

None.. you beat me to it.

4 minutes ago, fine-n-dandy said:

Fk knows fk cares really ?

Just checked.. he’s alive. Genuinely thought he died months ago. Way to ruin my day ?

[Kilgore Trout]

This is a match made in heaven. FFs sake it’s like Stepbrothers all over again 

[zeroisgod76]

1 hour ago, Roberto said:

24 goals this season.

So do you think his neighbour lied to you or just didn’t know what he was talking about?

[zeroisgod76]

Just now, Roberto said:

Lied. Without a doubt.

Celtic fan.

He has been dropped as a customer. I'll have words when I'm next in that street however.

Good man ???? The kind of customer you can do without 

[fine-n-dandy]

We now have 3 x 20 goals (potentially capable)  a season strikers but probably cannot see all of them fulfilling that because of game time. What a rare luxury we have never experienced 

[DD1903]

13 hours ago, Kilgore Trout said:

This is a match made in heaven. FFs sake it’s like Stepbrothers all over again 

Bit of a stutter, KT?

[NEM]

1 hour ago, fine-n-dandy said:

We now have 3 x 20 goals (potentially capable)  a season strikers but probably cannot see all of them fulfilling that because of game time. What a rare luxury we have never experienced 

Shearer, Jess, Booth and Paatelainen scored 84 between them season 92-93

[TheRedPrawcess]

21 hours ago, Daisy1903 said:

Obviously they count but surely you must see you used it to inflate his conversion.

He had 7 shots against Peterhead and scored 1. That's 14%.

He had 4 shots against Dumbarton and scored none. That's now 9% against shite opposition.

If I'm being fair he does look like he's more interested but to win back the supporters he lost he needs to score a lot more than 9%. I hope he does

Aye, to be fair you can pad stats both ways.

Does the 4 shots include the one he scored that was disallowed? In which case that's 18%. Plus throw in that he's 100% for penalties. Personally I don't buy into them being a free hit. Ask Andy Considine. Or Rashford, Saka and Sancho.

The post you quoted suggested somewhere around the 20% mark for shots to goals. I suspect (I'd have no idea how or where to check and verify this) that a 20% shot to goals rate is actually pretty good in our league. For someone position scoring more than 10 goals as season anyway.

[Daisy1903]

1 hour ago, TheRedPrawcess said:

Aye, to be fair you can pad stats both ways.

Does the 4 shots include the one he scored that was disallowed? In which case that's 18%. Plus throw in that he's 100% for penalties. Personally I don't buy into them being a free hit. Ask Andy Considine. Or Rashford, Saka and Sancho.

The post you quoted suggested somewhere around the 20% mark for shots to goals. I suspect (I'd have no idea how or where to check and verify this) that a 20% shot to goals rate is actually pretty good in our league. For someone position scoring more than 10 goals as season anyway.

Agree can be padded either way. I'm giving an opinion on his shots from open play and no I'm not going to count a disallowed goal. If we did should we then count any shots when offside? No.

He's 1 out of 11 against shite opposition and a lot of the chances have been very scoreable. That's just not good enough imo.

If he got to 20% then obviously that's a lot better but I'd either want him higher than that or for him to start bring others into play. At the moment all he does is shoot. He loses every header, can't even pass 5 yards and can't hold the ball up. While that happens then he needs to be converting more than 1 in 5 for me against SPL competition 

[aberdeen1970]

14 minutes ago, Daisy1903 said:

Agree can be padded either way. I'm giving an opinion on his shots from open play and no I'm not going to count a disallowed goal. If we did should we then count any shots when offside? No.

He's 1 out of 11 against shite opposition and a lot of the chances have been very scoreable. That's just not good enough imo.

If he got to 20% then obviously that's a lot better but I'd either want him higher than that or for him to start bring others into play. At the moment all he does is shoot. He loses every header, can't even pass 5 yards and can't hold the ball up. While that happens then he needs to be converting more than 1 in 5 for me against SPL competition 

We can't be counting disallowed goals. The key is in the word 'disallowed'.  Shouldn't be counting shots ruled out for offside either. 

Penalties are fair enough though. 

[fine-n-dandy]

1 hour ago, NEM said:

Shearer, Jess, Booth and Paatelainen scored 84 between them season 92-93

Yeah but did that really happen?

was that the real life?

Was that just fantasy?

21 each aye? ?

[TheRedPrawcess]

1 hour ago, Daisy1903 said:

Agree can be padded either way. I'm giving an opinion on his shots from open play and no I'm not going to count a disallowed goal. If we did should we then count any shots when offside? No.

He's 1 out of 11 against shite opposition and a lot of the chances have been very scoreable. That's just not good enough imo.

If he got to 20% then obviously that's a lot better but I'd either want him higher than that or for him to start bring others into play. At the moment all he does is shoot. He loses every header, can't even pass 5 yards and can't hold the ball up. While that happens then he needs to be converting more than 1 in 5 for me against SPL competition 

I'm not sure I count the opposition either. That chance in the first half, he was in a good position and the ball in was good. He should have scored it, regardless of opposition.

Genuinely, I think you'd find that a conversion rate of 1 goal per 5 shots is actually good enough in Scotland.

[redcryptoknight]

On 7/15/2022 at 8:01 AM, Millertime said:

A half chance, I'm used to him missing

COMPLETE SITTERS?

No, unacceptable 

What's your thoughts on Ramirez -  do you think he's any good or not?

[shut up meg]

3 minutes ago, redcryptoknight said:

What's your thoughts on Ramirez -  do you think he's any good or not?

He's scored more in 6 months than zero got in 4 years here.

[redcryptoknight]

2 hours ago, Daisy1903 said:

He's 1 out of 11 against shite opposition

Goals against shite opposition don't even count. Misses do count though. -1 for every not a goal.

By my calculations that brings Ramirez's goal tally this season to -10.

Unacceptable.

[Ke1t]

Weird that we feel we can arbitrarily decide if a goal counts or not.

Probably need to go through the history books and scratch off half of Harper's and Archibald's goals.