Torry Tosser Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 2 minutes ago, Tommy said: Tom Hanks would have been a better option then. Run Shayden Run. Link to comment
Big Hat Logan Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 10 minutes ago, Poodler said: You should You’re a shadow of your former self. Link to comment
Hoofball Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 4 minutes ago, Tommy said: Tom Hanks would have been a better option then. He didn’t want to negotiate with an idiot like Gunn Link to comment
Big Hat Logan Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 20 minutes ago, milne_afc said: Off the top of my head, there’s been boos for: Kerr Morris Langfield Foster Diamond The Ghost Kane Chris Clark almost every week Mackie Ifil Ryan Jack at the end of his time here Link to comment
GeorgeStreetReds Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 22 minutes ago, Tommy said: I’d love to know who it was that actually recommended him, and some others, as a signing. Something is seriously wrong with our scouting system. Imagine the reaction at Fleetwood when they got 400 grand for him, incredible. Link to comment
Durrant Dived Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 35 minutes ago, Tommy said: Something is seriously wrong with our scouting system. You just completely forgetting about Duk, Miovski, Ramadani like? Just like every other club on the planet some transfers work out and some don't. You're never going to have a 100% scouting success rate. Link to comment
Andy_123 Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 13 minutes ago, Durrant Dived said: You just completely forgetting about Duk, Miovski, Ramadani like? Just like every other club on the planet some transfers work out and some don't. You're never going to have a 100% scouting success rate. £400k for someone from the national league down south that had 0 goals and 0 assists to his name when we went to sign him can't be excused 1 Link to comment
Studebaker-90 Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 It’s a shame. He’s just clearly not good enough for this level. Asking him to play wing back was lunacy on warnocks part, that’s concerning. Wish him no ill will, but shouldn’t playing again. 1 Link to comment
Durrant Dived Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 3 minutes ago, Andy_123 said: £400k for someone from the national league down south that had 0 goals and 0 assists to his name when we went to sign him can't be excused I agree he's shite, but a similar fee for miovski is an absolute steal. Swings and roundabouts. Link to comment
Tommy Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 16 minutes ago, Durrant Dived said: You just completely forgetting about Duk, Miovski, Ramadani like? Just like every other club on the planet some transfers work out and some don't. You're never going to have a 100% scouting success rate. Obviously not. It’s paying decent money for certain players who are not decent that’s my issue. Too many have come in in recent years that are obviously not up to it. Due diligence on potential signings is vital. Link to comment
Granite95 Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 20 minutes ago, Durrant Dived said: You just completely forgetting about Duk, Miovski, Ramadani like? Just like every other club on the planet some transfers work out and some don't. You're never going to have a 100% scouting success rate. Get that however to spunk so much on a player who scored 2 goals in League 1 is mental, think everyone understands not every transfer works out but seemed obvious from day 1 Morris wouldnt be good enough Link to comment
Torry Tosser Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 8 minutes ago, Andy_123 said: £400k for someone from the national league down south that had 0 goals and 0 assists to his name when we went to sign him can't be excused Fleetwood League 1. 400,000 is nothing in football nowadays. Link to comment
sooth_stander Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 41 minutes ago, Durrant Dived said: You just completely forgetting about Duk, Miovski, Ramadani like? Just like every other club on the planet some transfers work out and some don't. You're never going to have a 100% scouting success rate. Not when you factor in Or Dadia, Williams, Morris, Stewart, Papa Joe, Richardson, thon Geordie winger (Roberts, was it?) plus the plethora of loans like Longstaff, Samuels, Makandy. There will be many many more; help me, guys? 25% hit rate is not good enough. As my dear old dad used to say every time there was a misplaced pass, if I did my job as badly as that, I’d expect to get sacked. Gunner & his recruitment team should be no different 3 Link to comment
Granite95 Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 2 minutes ago, Torry Tosser said: 400,000 is nothing in football nowadays. For us it's quite a sizeable investment, ken not every transfer will work out but to spend a fair whack of money on him and Richardson to get little to no return is criminal Link to comment
Big Hat Logan Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 18 minutes ago, Andy_123 said: £400k for someone from the national league down south that had 0 goals and 0 assists to his name when we went to sign him can't be excused Sam Cosgrove was the same. Sometimes it works out sometimes it doesn’t. 1 Link to comment
Granite95 Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 Just now, Big Hat Logan said: Sam Cosgrove was the same. Sometimes it works out sometimes it doesn’t. Cosgrove cost us at most £40,000 not £400,000 Link to comment
Andy_123 Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 Just now, Big Hat Logan said: Sam Cosgrove was the same. Sometimes it works out sometimes it doesn’t. Sam Cosgrove was a punt on a kid that cost £20k. Morris was signed for 20x that amount to come in as a starter. They are not comparable signings. Link to comment
paddy Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 1 hour ago, milne_afc said: Off the top of my head, there’s been boos for: Kerr Morris Langfield Foster Diamond The Ghost Kane I mind the crowd singing “He doesn’t give a fuck” at Mulgrew last game of the season at St Mirren in 2010. Good times. 2 Link to comment
RUL Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 1 hour ago, RAZOR said: Oh there's definitely been a few. Not since heard one as bad as last night since Mark Kerr. The abuse Kerr got was the highlight of that particular season. Should have been louder Link to comment
RUL Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 20 minutes ago, Torry Tosser said: Fleetwood League 1. 400,000 is nothing in football nowadays. It’s quite significant investment for afc. Shambles Link to comment
Durrant Dived Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 20 minutes ago, sooth_stander said: Not when you factor in Or Dadia, Williams, Morris, Stewart, Papa Joe, Richardson, thon Geordie winger (Roberts, was it?) plus the plethora of loans like Longstaff, Samuels, Makandy. There will be many many more; help me, guys? 25% hit rate is not good enough. There's also plenty that have been well worth the money paid for them. Ferguson, Cosgrove, Mclean to name a few. So you are really putting it as high as 3/4 signings are not a hit? I don't agree. Just because they aren't sold for millions doesn't mean they aren't a "hit". We are a small fish in a big pond. Most clubs will have a 35-50% hit rate in the market we are shopping in. Ps half the players you named weren't signed for a fee - free or loans.. Link to comment
GeorgeStreetReds Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 32 minutes ago, Torry Tosser said: Fleetwood League 1. 400,000 is nothing in football nowadays. £400k + a 4 year deal on probably £3k a week is an outlay of £1m on an absolutely abysmal player. We aren't Man City. Link to comment
GeorgeStreetReds Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 13 minutes ago, Durrant Dived said: There's also plenty that have been well worth the money paid for them. Ferguson, Cosgrove, Mclean to name a few. So you are really putting it as high as 3/4 signings are not a hit? I don't agree. Just because they aren't sold for millions doesn't mean they aren't a "hit". We are a small fish in a big pond. Most clubs will have a 35-50% hit rate in the market we are shopping in. Ps half the players you named weren't signed for a fee - free or loans.. Those you name were signed almost a decade ago now, our recent hit rate has been abysmal. 25% is kind. Link to comment
Robin Askwith Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 Gie him to Barnet for nothing. If they insist on giving us something, tell them to stick £100 into the kitty for the Christmas Party Link to comment
Millertime Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 1 hour ago, Tommy said: Tom Hanks would have been a better option then. I dont think Tom Hanks is fast? It was just the character he played and he was made to look faster with some camera trickery 2 Link to comment
Hoofball Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 5 minutes ago, Robin Askwith said: Gie him to Barnet for nothing. If they insist on giving us something, tell them to stick £100 into the kitty for the Christmas Party There’s no chance Barnet will have him for nothing, AFC will have to pay them a significant amount for them to take him off their hands Link to comment
GeorgeStreetReds Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 6 minutes ago, Robin Askwith said: Gie him to Barnet for nothing. If they insist on giving us something, tell them to stick £100 into the kitty for the Christmas Party He still has 2.5 years left on his contract. It's grim. Link to comment
Byrne Baby Byrne Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 3 hours ago, GeorgeStreetReds said: 400 grand and a four year deal this idiot cost us. Absolutely mental. Do we know how much Ruby, Jensen, Richardson, Gueye, Sokler, Clarkson, miovski & duk cost? would be interesting and disturbing to learn the total cost of our squad of shite (not saying all those players are bad) Link to comment
NEM Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 15 hours ago, Matt Armstrong's Dog said: You may be right min. A "standout" for a Fleetwood Town team when in League One, who are now dangerously hovering above the EFL drop zone. He wasn't - struggled to get a game. Link to comment
perthshirered Posted February 15 Share Posted February 15 6 minutes ago, Millertime said: I dont think Tom Hanks is fast? It was just the character he played and he was made to look faster with some camera trickery Depends if he's talking about Forrest Gump or Greyhound. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now