Millertime Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 1 hour ago, Matt Armstrong's Dog said: It's amazing how many posters on here cannot see by their own opinion and if you dare to express a modicum of disagreement to their opinion, baseless accusations about you as a person and your mind are thrown in your direction. "Agenda-driven".😄 My opinion is based on facts and evidence, not prejudice. Steve Clarke still not picking players if they have played with Aberdeen in the past m8? 2 Link to comment
ahead on alphabet Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 4 hours ago, Millertime said: He was our second best manager of the last 20 years It's irrefutable Who gives a fuck? The question was not whether he was or wasn't. It was whether or not his rambling on then about Aberdeen fans having unrealistic expectations are relevant now, I think. I'd say the overwhelming majority would quite rightly laugh at that notion and trying to turn the thread into a 'did Calderwood do a good job or not' won't change that. 1 Link to comment
Matt Armstrong's Dog Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 9 minutes ago, Millertime said: Steve Clarke still not picking players if they have played with Aberdeen in the past m8? 😴😴😴. Is it nae time for your dinnertime heated-up bottle of Sma milk? Link to comment
Millertime Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 4 minutes ago, ahead on alphabet said: Who gives a fuck? The question was not whether he was or wasn't. It was whether or not his rambling on then about Aberdeen fans having unrealistic expectations are relevant now, I think. I'd say the overwhelming majority would quite rightly laugh at that notion and trying to turn the thread into a 'did Calderwood do a good job or not' won't change that. You're contradicting yourself How can you not see it? In the last 20 plus years, calderwood and mcinnes did really well Compared to the 80s, no, they didn't, but as I keep trying to explain to you and most others, we aren't in the bloody 80s anymore Move on, it's embarrassing Link to comment
Helmet Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 1 minute ago, Millertime said: You're contradicting yourself How can you not see it? In the last 20 plus years, calderwood and mcinnes did really well Compared to the 80s, no, they didn't, but as I keep trying to explain to you and most others, we aren't in the bloody 80s anymore Move on, it's embarrassing McInnes and Calderwood easily our best two managers in that time period. Doesnt make them perfect but its churlish that anyone bothers to argue they aren’t. Link to comment
ahead on alphabet Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 18 minutes ago, Millertime said: You're contradicting yourself How can you not see it? In the last 20 plus years, calderwood and mcinnes did really well Compared to the 80s, no, they didn't, but as I keep trying to explain to you and most others, we aren't in the bloody 80s anymore Move on, it's embarrassing All I'm hearing here is me me me me. Please stop. Link to comment
Millertime Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 26 minutes ago, Matt Armstrong's Dog said: 😴😴😴. Is it nae time for your dinnertime heated-up bottle of Sma milk? What have I said that isn't accurate? Link to comment
Millertime Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 19 minutes ago, Helmet said: McInnes and Calderwood easily our best two managers in that time period. Doesnt make them perfect but its churlish that anyone bothers to argue they aren’t. Exactly It's the fact people do argue it that is exhibit a) re being stuck in the 80s Link to comment
strachanmcgheegoal Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 27 minutes ago, Millertime said: In the last 20 plus years, calderwood and mcinnes did really well So to be clear youre not comparing them to the 80's but you are comparing them to the current shambles on which you have concluded that they "did really well" To quote Di Caprio, I concur. 1 Link to comment
Helmet Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 13 minutes ago, Millertime said: Exactly It's the fact people do argue it that is exhibit a) re being stuck in the 80s It’s certainly not a good look is it. Link to comment
ahead on alphabet Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 42 minutes ago, Helmet said: McInnes and Calderwood easily our best two managers in that time period. Doesnt make them perfect but its churlish that anyone bothers to argue they aren’t. Of course they were. Who has said they weren't? Are you jumping on the 'millertime argue with yourself bus' too? I've skimmed back over the thread a bit and I can't see anyone that has said they weren't. I think he's sucked you in 😂 1 Link to comment
Matt Armstrong's Dog Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 22 minutes ago, Millertime said: What have I said that isn't accurate? You have got it eternally embedded in your psyche about your feelings about Jimmy Calderwood and, to back those up, have a adopted a self-fulfilling prophecy that what your think and feel about JC is infallibly correct. Well for one, you said we beat the now-defunct Dnipro. We never, although we got through to the EL group stages that season on the away goals rule. I cannot be arsed continuing. COYFR!!!🤞 Link to comment
eeps Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 53 minutes ago, Millertime said: You're contradicting yourself How can you not see it? In the last 20 plus years, calderwood and mcinnes did really well Compared to the 80s, no, they didn't, but as I keep trying to explain to you and most others, we aren't in the bloody 80s anymore Move on, it's embarrassing move back to 70s then, point is emphasised, damned with faint praise. Link to comment
Millertime Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 22 minutes ago, strachanmcgheegoal said: So to be clear youre not comparing them to the 80's but you are comparing them to the current shambles on which you have concluded that they "did really well" To quote Di Caprio, I concur. I know you know already, but I'll say it anyway How a team does over a 20-plus year period is a good barometer of how good they are, generally Mcinnes then calderwood have been the best 2 of that period, yet they get the most grief and constantly get slagged off Whys that? Because somehow they are accused of not doing well enough They've done amazingly considering the Shite before and after them The only yardstick for not doing well would be, what? Ding ding ding Yep, the 80s Sasssssssssh Link to comment
Millertime Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 5 minutes ago, Matt Armstrong's Dog said: You have got it eternally embedded in your psyche about your feelings about Jimmy Calderwood and, to back those up, have a adopted a self-fulfilling prophecy that what your think and feel about JC is infallibly correct. Well for one, you said we beat the now-defunct Dnipro. We never, although we got through to the EL group stages that season on the away goals rule. I cannot be arsed continuing. COYFR!!!🤞 Lol Enjoy your day sir Link to comment
Matt Armstrong's Dog Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 Just now, Millertime said: Lol Enjoy your day sir 👍, same to you loon. Link to comment
strachanmcgheegoal Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 22 minutes ago, Millertime said: Mcinnes then calderwood have been the best 2 of that period, yet they get the most grief and constantly get slagged off Really? Or is it just those you're most sensitive to? Link to comment
strachanmcgheegoal Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 And to answer your question (See I do read your posts) The yardstick on which Calderwood failed was Domestic Cups and nothing to do with the 80s. The yardstick on which Darak failed was Europe and nothing to do with the 80s. Jimmy C over achieved overall so I dont really have a beef with him. Derek in my opinion under achieved on potential especially at the end and so rightly in my eyes gets criticised for that specific point. Anyhoos, County n'that. Link to comment
Millertime Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 6 minutes ago, strachanmcgheegoal said: Really? Or is it just those you're most sensitive to? You think the majority of mcinnes or calderwood comments here aren't derogatory? Link to comment
Millertime Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 2 minutes ago, strachanmcgheegoal said: And to answer your question (See I do read your posts) The yardstick on which Calderwood failed was Domestic Cups and nothing to do with the 80s. The yardstick on which Darak failed was Europe and nothing to do with the 80s. Jimmy C over achieved overall so I dont really have a beef with him. Derek in my opinion under achieved on potential especially at the end and so rightly in my eyes gets criticised for that specific point. Anyhoos, County n'that. Yep we are never agreeing on this one (It's you that's wrong) Hope you enjoy your afternoon Link to comment
strachanmcgheegoal Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 4 minutes ago, Millertime said: Yep we are never agreeing on this one (It's you that's wrong) Hope you enjoy your afternoon Miovski brace and a County red for being excessively ginger would improve it hugely! 1 Link to comment
Helmet Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 2 hours ago, ahead on alphabet said: Of course they were. Who has said they weren't? Are you jumping on the 'millertime argue with yourself bus' too? I've skimmed back over the thread a bit and I can't see anyone that has said they weren't. I think he's sucked you in 😂 You actually read back through this thread? Sounds more like you’re daft cunt MT has on a string. Link to comment
ahead on alphabet Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 12 minutes ago, Helmet said: You actually read back through this thread? Sounds more like you’re daft cunt MT has on a string. Oh dear. Poor wee thing 😂 Link to comment
Helmet Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 23 minutes ago, ahead on alphabet said: Oh dear. Poor wee thing 😂 Funny, but I’ve never even noticed you before. Link to comment
fine-n-dandy Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 Calderwood was one of the cunts that started the spread of this nonsense that Aberdeen fans expect too much. Link to comment
muttonhumper Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 8 hours ago, Matt Armstrong's Dog said: Over there, I actually thought we played better against them than at home and the 5-1 scoreline flattered Bayern, Would have won that game 1-0 if we had this guy in goals. Link to comment
Jocky Balboa Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 25 minutes ago, fine-n-dandy said: Calderwood was one of the cunts that started the spread of this nonsense that Aberdeen fans expect too much. Agree. He simply put it out as his primary excuse (backed by the Weegia of course, who wanted us to get back in our box and accept the perpetual duopoly) for his atrocious cup record and when it became apparent after the first 3 years he could take us no further. That said, many of us remember all too well that Willie Miller didn't help things by appearing to empathise with Balsawood. He went from being the Board's biggest critic, to being its flak jacket, once he accepted the "Executive Football Consultant" position and resorted to damage limitation PR for the Wig Wam Bam. Link to comment
Big Hat Logan Posted March 30 Author Share Posted March 30 14 hours ago, Jocky Balboa said: No, Balsawood was not right. This was just an excuse for his inability to kick on, after an initial turnaround. He was well suited to the job for the first few years and brought in some good players, but when it became time to push on and reach cup finals, he was clearly out of his depth. Yes, we had one exciting European run, but as Brian Irvine rightly said at the time, it was an adventure that "simply papered over the cracks of our true position". The cup results were dreadful; in ten attempts, two semi-finals were his best results and both ended in four goal defeats. We also succumbed to lower league opposition in cups THREE TIMES in as many years, as well as a 4-1 hammering from Hibs and a 3-0 thumping from Hearts. Most of all, despite having by far and away the fourth biggest budget every season (and Heart of MadLithuanian were in disarray, changing managers yearly, overspending massively and run by a nutjob) he only managed one 3rd place finish - and the 4th place finishes of the last two seasons were a struggle, where we barely secured the Top 6! Nope, sorry, but he was a decent but overrated manager and it was the right decision to part with him, despite McGhee's subsequent failure. Scottish football is where it is because too many (especially fawning weegies like him) accept the status quo and never rock the boat or upset the arse cheeks' apple cart. How do you “rock the boat” and “upset the arse cheeks apple cart”. Genuine question given we would need hundreds of millions of investment complete with them so interested as to how we do this without it. Link to comment
Matt Armstrong's Dog Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 43 minutes ago, muttonhumper said: Would have won that game 1-0 if we had this guy in goals. 😄😄 Link to comment
Dandyesque Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 On 3/29/2024 at 11:36 AM, Millertime said: We were top 4 for 7 or 8 years, finishing 2nd more than 4th In countless semis and finals up against one of if not the best celtic team of the last few decades, managed by a guy on £3M a year That was deemed not good enough and THATS why people say we have unrealistic expectations It's undebateable Check the nick of us now But that was better than what Jimmy achieved, so he was wrong - we could do better and did. 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now