Jump to content

Inferior Clubs Games In Spfl


Recommended Posts


4 minutes ago, Big Hat Logan said:

Kris Boyd saying that Celtic struggle when teams sit in against them but have a lot more joy when teams “have a go”.

That can’t be right surely? So many on here reckon all you have to do is “have a go”? 🤔

When it comes to Celtic we get pumped either way.

Link to comment
Just now, Big Hat Logan said:

Do you disagree with Kris Boyd? Or agree with people on the internet who wouldn’t know the first thing about football management 🤔

I don't give a fuck about a single thing Kris Boyd has said in his entire life. 

You keep using them the try and initiate pointless arguments with strangers online though. 👍

Link to comment
1 minute ago, shut up meg said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/67850604

Huns complaining about penalties,  nae luck ye tinks 

Staggering lack of self-awareness on the part of the Huns. They're rolling sixes though, as Crocker said during the commentary they could hear the VAR discussion and there was no mention of offside.

It was the right decision and for what it's worth i didn't feel it was a penalty. But they didn't have the courage of their convictions and moved the goalposts around the reasoning. Officialdom has dug a hole for itself.

The fallout will result in more decisions given in favour of the Huns against the other teams. Kilmarnock can look forward to a red card and (at least one) penalty against them on Tuesday.

Link to comment
8 hours ago, Byrne Baby Byrne said:

Rangers not getting that pen is a classic example of selective var. There’s no way they wouldn’t have got that pen if it was at pittodrie 

I agree.  Same with the two handed push at the other end.  Can’t decide if there’s more to the handball one or not.  It’s categorically offside ergo not a penalty but did Collum just get lucky?

interesting point on Bernardo’s challenge on Goldson on Sportscene too.  It’s not a challenge of note by Barnardo (I didn’t think so at the time) but Goldsons actions are, cough, interesting.

Link to comment
54 minutes ago, strachanmcgheegoal said:

I agree.  Same with the two handed push at the other end.  Can’t decide if there’s more to the handball one or not.  It’s categorically offside ergo not a penalty but did Collum just get lucky?

interesting point on Bernardo’s challenge on Goldson on Sportscene too.  It’s not a challenge of note by Barnardo (I didn’t think so at the time) but Goldsons actions are, cough, interesting.

He 100% got lucky. If that is what car were looking at it in the first place it would have shown you the lines while they were deciding - and the check would have taken a lot longer. 
 

to announce about 40 minutes after it happened that it was offside was a joke. 
 

huns will be raging, which is lovely

Link to comment
7 hours ago, Byrne Baby Byrne said:

He 100% got lucky. If that is what car were looking at it in the first place it would have shown you the lines while they were deciding - and the check would have taken a lot longer. 
 

to announce about 40 minutes after it happened that it was offside was a joke. 
 

huns will be raging, which is lovely

Why did the SFA announce that the Sevco player was offside in the 1st place? Have they ever got involved and done this before, in VAR’s 15 month history? Is it just cos this is a “showpiece game”?

Or was it cos Sky have access to the audio and would have spilled the beans anyway?

Link to comment
23 minutes ago, sooth_stander said:

Why did the SFA announce that the Sevco player was offside in the 1st place? Have they ever got involved and done this before, in VAR’s 15 month history? Is it just cos this is a “showpiece game”?

Or was it cos Sky have access to the audio and would have spilled the beans anyway?

Cause collum was shitting himself after making an arse of it and when they noticed half an hour later he was offside they couldn’t wait to inform Sky 

Link to comment
14 minutes ago, sooth_stander said:

Why did the SFA announce that the Sevco player was offside in the 1st place? Have they ever got involved and done this before, in VAR’s 15 month history? Is it just cos this is a “showpiece game”?

Or was it cos Sky have access to the audio and would have spilled the beans anyway?

Seems it was the SFA's way of explaining away a "controversial" decision. Controversial only for not having been given to a team whose name is routinely prefaced with the word penalty. Had it been any other side denied and i include Celtic in this, you wouldn't have heard a peep out of them.

It's a huge faux pas on their part as while offside would have been the right call, it wasn't the reason the penalty wasn't given. Collum simply didn't think it was a penalty. The Huns are demanding the audio as Crocker said during the broadcast they could hear the VAR discussion and there was no mention of offside.

Sevco are rolling sixes here in that it deflects from recent talk of the volume of penalties they receive and the length of time since one was last awarded against them. They'll be painting themselves as victims of an anti-The Rangers agenda, which their crayon munching supporters will buy into completely. And going forward officials will be even more reluctant to give a decision against them for fear of the scrutiny and inevitable abuse that follows.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
11 minutes ago, JamieMT said:

Seems it was the SFA's way of explaining away a "controversial" decision. Controversial only for not having been given to a team whose name is routinely prefaced with the word penalty. Had it been any other side denied and i include Celtic in this, you wouldn't have heard a peep out of them.

It's a huge faux pas on their part as while offside would have been the right call, it wasn't the reason the penalty wasn't given. Collum simply didn't think it was a penalty. The Huns are demanding the audio as Crocker said during the broadcast they could hear the VAR discussion and there was no mention of offside.

Sevco are rolling sixes here in that it deflects from recent talk of the volume of penalties they receive and the length of time since one was last awarded against them. They'll be painting themselves as victims of an anti-The Rangers agenda, which their crayon munching supporters will buy into completely. And going forward officials will be even more reluctant to give a decision against them for fear of the scrutiny and inevitable abuse that follows.

The sheer brass neck of the hun rodents is beyond belief. They’ve not conceded a pen for years yet they’ve the cheek to complain about their offside player not getting one.

Laughable

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
6 minutes ago, Zeus said:

The state the filth are getting in about 1 fucking desicion going against them. LOL.

Sooner those pair of arseholes GTF out the league the better.

I knows, it's mental, considering it was the correct decision. You don't hear them moaning about the countless wrong decisions that go their way of course. Pair of cunts.

Link to comment
14 minutes ago, Zeus said:

The state the filth are getting in about 1 fucking desicion going against them. LOL.

Sooner those pair of arseholes GTF out the league the better.

Demanding an enquiry over not getting a penalty….

That was offside anyway.

Wish all these hun cunts would just fucking die and make 2024 a happy new year.

FTHB 

  • Upvote 8
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...