Guest CAPSLOCK Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 I was too busy pooping my pants the whole game to be caring about individual performances, no single one of them stood out for me, but every last one of them scrapped and fought and gave us a result we can be proud of. WHAT HE SAID. I'M STILL LOST FOR WORDS...... Link to comment
The Hobbit Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 WHAT HE SAID. I'M STILL LOST FOR WORDS...... Today gets better and better. Link to comment
Guest CAPSLOCK Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 Today gets better and better. *SILENTLY BENDS OVER IN FRONT OF THE HOBBIT AND POINTS AT HIS BUM. Link to comment
The Hobbit Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 Has to be said, what the ***k was the goalie doing? Link to comment
The Hobbit Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 *SILENTLY BENDS OVER IN FRONT OF THE HOBBIT AND POINTS AT HIS BUM. Keep your big red bumhole to yourself. Link to comment
Guest CAPSLOCK Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 Has to be said, what the ***k was the goalie doing? PICKING THE BALL OUT OF THE NET. Link to comment
BTR Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 Stato alert. Looking beyond the EC whether we qualify or not, I think it's important to make sure we get a big push up the co-efficient table so we get a better WC Qualifying draw. The way things stand our co-efficient is 1.789 which would see us comfortably in the 3rd group of seeds which is where we want to be. If we take 3pts from the last 3 games we'll be on 1.682 for the WC qualifiers which might be borderline, but should probably be just enough. We might still yet suffer thanks to Berti's miserable campaign last time where we only took 13pts from 10 games which taken on its own is a dismal 1.3 and another similar catastrophic performance would've seen us drop to bandit country. Link to comment
BTR Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 We should be pushing for 2nd group of seeds!!! To do that we'd need to take maximum points from the last 3 games to achieve a 1.9 rating. Not totally impossible, but highly unlikely and kind of dependent how many qualifying groups there will be, I'm basing it on there being 7 groups as current, but in all likelihood there may be 8 given neither the hosts or champions are from Europe this time (and therefore no Europeans have auto qualification). That's why I say the Vogts campaign f*cked us up. Link to comment
The Hobbit Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 To do that we'd need to take maximum points from the last 3 games to achieve a 1.9 rating. Not totally impossible, but highly unlikely and kind of dependent how many qualifying groups there will be, I'm basing it on there being 7 groups as current, but in all likelihood there may be 8 given neither the hosts or champions are from Europe this time (and therefore no Europeans have auto qualification). That's why I say the Vogts campaign f*cked us up. Italy aren't from Europe? Or are we still in the situation where the winners need to qualify? Link to comment
K-9 Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 Stato alert. Looking beyond the EC whether we qualify or not, I think it's important to make sure we get a big push up the co-efficient table so we get a better WC Qualifying draw. The way things stand our co-efficient is 1.789 which would see us comfortably in the 3rd group of seeds which is where we want to be. If we take 3pts from the last 3 games we'll be on 1.682 for the WC qualifiers which might be borderline, but should probably be just enough. We might still yet suffer thanks to Berti's miserable campaign last time where we only took 13pts from 10 games which taken on its own is a dismal 1.3 and another similar catastrophic performance would've seen us drop to bandit country.Usually the groups are taken from results from last 2 qualifying groups rather than co-efficients. Link to comment
BTR Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 Italy aren't from Europe? Or are we still in the situation where the winners need to qualify? My mistake, I was thinking Brazil for some strange reason . I can't remember about the qualification issue tbh. Brazil had to qualify last time didn't they? Link to comment
Madbad Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 My mistake, I was thinking Brazil for some strange reason . I can't remember about the qualification issue tbh. Brazil had to qualify last time didn't they? Aye, only the hosts are automatic these days. Link to comment
BTR Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 Usually the groups are taken from results from last 2 qualifying groups rather than co-efficients. Yes, that's how I've worked it out. Still classed as a "co-efficient" though isn't it? 13pts from last campaign (10 games)24pts from 12 games in this campaign (speculative) 37pts in 22 games = 1.682 Link to comment
K-9 Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 Yes, that's how I've worked it out. Still classed as a "co-efficient" though isn't it? 13pts from last campaign (10 games)24pts from 12 games in this campaign (speculative) 37pts in 22 games = 1.682Think there is a site that works this out from a while back!! Link to comment
K-9 Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 http://sport.scotsman.com/football_worldcup.cfm?id=996502007 Link to comment
BTR Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 http://sport.scotsman.com/football_worldcup.cfm?id=996502007 It's still the same method to calculate it, it just means that with 9 groups, to get into the third seeds, we'd need to be 27th at worst, as opposed to 21st with the current 7-group set-up, ie we have a better chance. So, to take Robo's point again about pushing into the second seeds, based on Norway currently being in 18th place with 1.778, we'd need to take 6 points from our last 3 games to give ourselves a chance of breaking into the second group of seeds. Link to comment
K-9 Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 It's still the same method to calculate it, it just means that with 9 groups, to get into the third seeds, we'd need to be 27th at worst, as opposed to 21st with the current 7-group set-up, ie we have a better chance. So, to take Robo's point again about pushing into the second seeds, based on Norway currently being in 18th place with 1.778, we'd need to take 6 points from our last 3 games to give ourselves a chance of breaking into the second group of seeds.Yup - but just can't find the site that told you the latest list. Link to comment
BTR Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 Yup - but just can't find the site that told you the latest list. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UEFA_coefficients Link to comment
Guest CAPSLOCK Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 ANYONE ELSE LOOK AT JAMES MCFADDEN'S ROLE OF LONE STRIKER LAST NIGHT AND THINK OF STEVIE LOVELL? NO, ME NEITHER. Link to comment
K-9 Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UEFA_coefficientsThere was another site which did this totally up to date from all matches played. Since this draw we will lose their decent qualifying campaign from last Euro Championships when we finished second and left with last world cup campaign which was pretty rank!! Link to comment
Guest CAPSLOCK Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 ON A SIDE NOTE, I'M SURE THE PUNDIT LAST NIGHT SAID "THE SCOTTISH TEAM HAVEN'T WON ON FRENCH SOIL FOR 58 YEARS"....... IS THAT TRUE OR DOES HE MEAN DUNKIRK?! Link to comment
K-9 Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 Latest list as per 25th June: PPG1 Italy 2.2942 Germany 2.7143 Netherlands 2.5564 Sweden 2.4715 Croatia 2.4126 Portugal 2.3167 England 2.2948 Poland 2.263 9 France 2.235 10 Romania 2.21111 Czech 2.15812 Serbia 2.11813 Spain 2.05914 Ukraine 2.05615 Greece 2.05316 Turkey 2.000 17 Russia 2.00018 Israel 1.944 19 Norway 1.82420 Switzerland 1.80021 Denmark 1.77822 Bulgaria 1.76523 Ireland 1.76524 Bosnia 1.706 25 Slovakia 1.68426 Scotland 1.64727 Finland 1.500 28 Austria 1.50029 N.Ireland 1.37530 Hungary 1.17631 Albania 1.15832 Belgium 1.056 33 Belarus 1.00034 Lithuania 1.00035 Latvia 1.00036 Slovenia 0.941 37 Wales 0.93838 Estonia 0.89539 Macedonia 0.84240 Georgia 0.80041 Armenia 0.73742 Liechtenstein 0.63243 Cyprus 0.50044 Iceland 0.47145 Azerbaijan 0.444 46 Malta 0.41247 Moldova 0.41248 Kazakhstan 0.35049 Andorra 0.26350 Faroe Islands 0.05651 Luxembourg 0.00052 San Marino 0.00053 Montenegro 0.000 Since then we have 2 wins to boost us up comfortable in 3rd seeds but another couple of wins could see us push for 2nd seeds, with Israel losing since the above, Rusiia winning 1 and losing 1, Ukraine drawing and losing. scotland v Ukraine could be even more important!! Link to comment
Madbad Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 We will surely overtake the likes of Israel after this? Link to comment
DandyDons1903 Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 I was under the impression we had moved under 20th in the rankings. I'm virtually certain we did. Link to comment
BTR Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 I was under the impression we had moved under 20th in the rankings. I'm virtually certain we did. We did, but the rankings and the co-efficients table are not the same thing. Co-efficients are more important. Madbad, as things stand we are on 1.789, as I posted earlier. Link to comment
Madbad Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 We did, but the rankings and the co-efficients table are not the same thing. Co-efficients are more important. Madbad, as things stand we are on 1.789, as I posted earlier. Sorry, getting mixed up with qualification rankings and FIFA world ratings Me thick Link to comment
roosterbooster Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 here's the up to date Co-efficients after last nights games - Comfortably in 3rd group would need 9 points to move up to second group. Though regadless if we have a good World Cup 2012 qualifiction then we could be pushing for top seeds as we will dump Berti's miserable campaign. For the World Cup it will most likely be 8 groups for qualifying Combined Played Points Coeff 1 Germany 8 22 2.7502 Netherlands 20 52 2.6003 Croatia 19 47 2.4744 Sweden 18 43 2.3895 England 19 45 2.3686 Italy 19 43 2.2637 Romania 20 45 2.2508 Czech 21 47 2.238 9 Poland 21 45 2.14310 Portugal 22 47 2.13611 Turkey 20 42 2.10012 France 19 39 2.05313 Spain 19 39 2.05314 Greece 20 40 2.00015 Russia 21 41 1.95216 Serbia 20 38 1.900 17 Ukraine 24 42 1.75018 Israel 19 35 1.84219 Norway 19 35 1.84220 Denmark 20 36 1.80021 Scotland 19 34 1.78922 Bulgaria 19 33 1.73723 Ireland 19 31 1.63224 Slovakia 21 33 1.571 25 Bosnia 19 29 1.52626 Finalnd 23 35 1.52227 N Ireland 19 25 1.31628 Hungary 19 23 1.21129 Slovenia 19 22 1.15830 Belguim 20 23 1.15031 Albania 20 22 1.10032 Lithuania 19 20 1.053 33 Latvia 20 21 1.05034 Wales 18 18 1.00035 Estonia 22 21 0.95536 Belarus 19 17 0.89537 Macedonia 21 17 0.81038 Georgia 21 17 0.81039 Cyprus 18 14 0.77840 Armenia 20 15 0.750 41 Iceland 19 12 0.63242 Lichenstein 21 12 0.57143 Moldova 19 10 0.52644 Azerbjan 18 8 0.44445 Malta 18 8 0.44446 Kazhakstan 22 8 0.36447 Andorra 21 5 0.23848 Faroes 19 1 0.05349 Luxemburg 21 0 0.00050 San Marino 19 0 0.000 Link to comment
Nelly Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 here's the up to date Co-efficients after last nights games - Comfortably in 3rd group would need 9 points to move up to second group. Though regadless if we have a good World Cup 2012 qualifiction then we could be pushing for top seeds as we will dump Berti's miserable campaign. For the World Cup it will most likely be 8 groups for qualifying Combined Played Points Coeff 1 Germany 8 22 2.7502 Netherlands 20 52 2.6003 Croatia 19 47 2.4744 Sweden 18 43 2.3895 England 19 45 2.3686 Italy 19 43 2.2637 Romania 20 45 2.2508 Czech 21 47 2.238 9 Poland 21 45 2.14310 Portugal 22 47 2.13611 Turkey 20 42 2.10012 France 19 39 2.05313 Spain 19 39 2.05314 Greece 20 40 2.00015 Russia 21 41 1.95216 Serbia 20 38 1.900 17 Ukraine 24 42 1.75018 Israel 19 35 1.84219 Norway 19 35 1.84220 Denmark 20 36 1.80021 Scotland 19 34 1.78922 Bulgaria 19 33 1.73723 Ireland 19 31 1.63224 Slovakia 21 33 1.571 Shouldn't Ukraine be below us now?? Link to comment
jeffers Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 Shouldn't Ukraine be below us now?? NO, against them Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now