Fucks Sake Langfield

[tommo1903]

Aye, why not.

 

So why didn't Scott Leitch get a clean slate then, cockbreath?

[tup]

So why didn't Scott Leitch then, cockbreath?

 

Because he's a prick.

 

Just like you.

[tommo1903]

Because he's a prick.

 

Just like you.

 

Thats twice in a row I have destroyed you in an argument.

 

tommo1903 > tup.

 

tup = bluto.

[Karl Fletcher]

sheepiekev and Tup agreeing on something

[Dynamo]

Thats twice in a row I have destroyed you in an argument.

tommo1903 > tup.

 

tup = bluto.

 

It's pretty straight forward.

 

Once he resorts to telling you to "Fuck Off" you've cracked it.

[sheepiekev]

So why didn't Scott Leitch get a clean slate then, cockbreath?

 

Scott Leitch had absolutely no man management skills and was universally loathed within the club.

That is a fact.

He deserved fuck all.

[tommo1903]

It's pretty straight forward.

 

Once he resorts to telling you to "Fuck Off" you've cracked it.

 

Pretty much.

 

Much like Jason Brown is superior to Jamie Langfield, I am superior to Tup.

[360]

 

tup = bluto.

 

Ouch.

[tup]

Maybe you could point out where you won any argument against me, just for the record.

 

I thought you made some pishy point about McGhee deserving a 'clean slate' (which he got, except from me) every season, and I said he didna deserve it, as he's a shit manager.

 

I said players are different because you can be a good player in a shit team, and therefore if you have different team mates you might shine and deserve the chance to.

 

You then said what about assistant managers

 

They may be good assistant managers in shit coaching teams. Disna matter a fuck. The bullet stops with the manager. He takes these guys down with him regardless of how good they are.

 

Ergo, McGhee gets no clean slate, Langfield does.

 

I can see why you work in a bakery.

[tommo1903]

Scott Leitch had absolutely no man management skills and was universally loathed within the club.

That is a fact.

He deserved fuck all.

 

Thanks for your input.

 

I'm struggling to comprehend how someone can be universally loathed within a club, let alone it being a fact.

 

It also bears absolutely no relevance to the argument, but thanks anyway.

[tup]

It's pretty straight forward.

 

Once he resorts to telling you to "Fuck Off" you've cracked it.

 

I dinna think so.

 

I told you to fuckoff after I told you that you were talking out of a hole in your arse.

 

Cheers.

[Bobby Connor]

The bullet?

[tommo1903]

Maybe you could point out where you won any argument against me, just for the record.

 

I thought you made some pishy point about McGhee deserving a 'clean slate' (which he got, except from me) every season, and I said he didna deserve it, as he's a shit manager.

 

I said players are different because you can be a good player in a shit team, and therefore if you have different team mates you might shine and deserve the chance to.

 

You then said what about assistant managers

 

They may be good assistant managers in shit coaching teams. Disna matter a fuck. The bullet stops with the manager. He takes these guys down with him regardless of how good they are.

 

Ergo, McGhee gets no clean slate, Langfield does.

 

I can see why you work in a bakery.

 

Helsinki thread, where I made you look like a fool, as usual.

 

Assistant managers point showed you up for your hypocrisy, as usual.

 

Reverting to that old classic is a sign of weakness.

[tup]

I've no idea what your point is or how it constitutes winning an argument.

 

What I do know is that you're full of shit.

[tommo1903]

I've no idea what your point is or how it constitutes winning an argument.

 

What I do know is that you're full of shit.

 

I decide when an argument is won or not.

[RTYD]

Aye, because in my opinion he's a better keeper.

 

We'll agree to disgree on that one then.

[RTYD]

I'm not one for common consensus Connor, in fact I rail against it.

 

He's not as shite as he's being made out to be is my point, not that he's not shite.

 

 

On the shite scale he's fifth Dan.

[RTYD]

As the fans dislike of Clangers grows and after such a high profile fuck up at the weekend Auld Broon can't afford to play him IMO.

 

Leaving aside the fact that he's garbage.

The first flap at a cross, the first fumbled save, the first dropped ball in the box, the first dodgy goal kick then we as fans are going to be right on his back shouting dogs abuse.

Langfield has now been identified as public enemy number 1 with a great number of fans.

That'll spread to the majority.

 

His confidence is made of glass just now anyway.

It's not going to get better.

 

He knows his nickname, he knows why he's got it.

I bet money he goes into each game hoping he doesn't make another fuck up or cost us the game.

He can't operate like that and we as a club can't afford to nursemaid him through it.

 

We need to get points on the board.

With Clangers in goals I've no confidence in him not undoing the good work potentially done by the outfield players.

 

Bench him or bin him.

I'm nae fussed which, but one or the other please auld Broon.

 

All of this highlights how stupid it was to give him a new contract.

[RTYD]

Pretty much.

 

Much like Jason Brown is superior to Jamie Langfield, I am superior to Tup.

 

Nae much to shout about, Millertime is superior to Tup

[Bobbyskitter]

i feel Langfield should be dropped for his mistake on Saturday, not only because it was the worlds most pathetic attempt at a save but because having a keeper capable of that kind of cock up is bound to have a unsettling effect on the team.

 

A defense should be able to expect their keeper to bail them out if they make a mistake, once the defence has seen their keeper make a mistake like that they wont even have faith in him to do the basics properly.

[tup]

Game, set and match Tommo and Dynamo I think.

 

As if anyone gives a fuck what you think.

[tup]

Nae much to shout about, Millertime is superior to Tup

 

Weegies are not fit to lace my boots.

[RTYD]

Game, set and match Tommo and Dynamo I think.

 

Instead of writing about a corner the cunt should go and sit in one.

[tup]

You lot don't know your own minds.

 

You dinna have the courage of your convictions.

 

I'll expect apologies when I'm proven correct.

[RTYD]

i feel Langfield should be dropped for his mistake on Saturday, not only because it was the worlds most pathetic attempt at a save but because having a keeper capable of that kind of cock up is bound to have a unsettling effect on the team.

 

A defense should be able to expect their keeper to bail them out if they make a mistake, once the defence has seen their keeper make a mistake like that they wont even have faith in him to do the basics properly.

 

Very good points. No matter how much his teammates publicly support him, each and everyone of them will have a sharp intake of breathe whenever the ball goes near him. No way to build a team. The club should admit their mistake and tell him he is available for transfer. If he stays then he is on the bench.

[RTYD]

Weegies are not fit to lace my boots.

 

Deluded fool.

[RTYD]

You lot don't know your own minds.

 

You dinna have the courage of your convictions.

 

I'll expect apologies when I'm proven correct.

 

You can't be proven correct as turds are unpolishable.

[tup]

We'll see RTYD.

 

Your plan for the club to 'admit a mistake' and transfer list him is ludicrous.

 

I'm amazed you have a workforce willing to staff your office such are your exacting standards.

 

One strike and you're out, harsh.

[sheepiekev]

Thanks for your input.

 

I'm struggling to comprehend how someone can be universally loathed within a club, let alone it being a fact.

 

It also bears absolutely no relevance to the argument, but thanks anyway.

 

Because someone within the club told me, which is good enough for me, and holds far more substance than you to be honest.

And it was you that brought up the subject of assistant managers FFS!

[Frank Butcher]

Tup,

 

If Scott leitch was exempt from "the new season, clean start" argument due to him being a prick, that is fair enough.

 

But wanting to join Rangers, surely automatically makes you a prick, so therefore Langfield should not be allowed the same courtesy from other people of being allowed a clean start this season, because he is a hun prick ??