360 Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 Hopefully fatso Broon will be between the sticks on Saturday. If not, I'll be revising my prediction for the game to 2-1. Considine own goal. Link to comment
tup Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 Tup, If Scott leitch was exempt from "the new season, clean start" argument due to him being a prick, that is fair enough. But wanting to join Rangers, surely automatically makes you a prick, so therefore Langfield should not be allowed the same courtesy from other people of being allowed a clean start this season, because he is a hun prick ?? I've no doubt Langfield is a prick. I'm also under no illusions about his abilities as a goalkeeper. All I'm saying is a little support can go a long way, the poor bugger has been through the mill recently, came back from it, and then gets crucified for his first mistake after his comeback. Link to comment
tup Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 Shut your mouth. I never fucking opened it. Link to comment
Site Sponsor RTYD Posted August 8, 2012 Site Sponsor Share Posted August 8, 2012 We'll see RTYD. Your plan for the club to 'admit a mistake' and transfer list him is ludicrous. I'm amazed you have a workforce willing to staff your office such are your exacting standards. One strike and you're out, harsh. The statement of the century thus far. Tup is saying that Langfield has made one mistake in his AFC career, or he is too thick to realise that all of us wanting him out base our argument on his entire AFC career. If it were down to us, Saturday's abomination would not have ocurred as he would be on the dole queue. Link to comment
Site Sponsor RTYD Posted August 8, 2012 Site Sponsor Share Posted August 8, 2012 I've no doubt Langfield is a prick. I'm also under no illusions about his abilities as a goalkeeper. All I'm saying is a little support can go a long way, the poor bugger has been through the mill recently, came back from it, and then gets crucified for his first mistake after his comeback. Oh dear. So he should be playing as a sympathy matter. Link to comment
tup Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 I already said I was basing my assessment on this season only. Several times. Pay attention, I hate having to repeat myself. Link to comment
tup Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 Oh dear. So he should be playing as a sympathy matter. Another huge extrapolation. I never said that. Link to comment
Frank Butcher Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 I've no doubt Langfield is a prick. I'm also under no illusions about his abilities as a goalkeeper. All I'm saying is a little support can go a long way, the poor bugger has been through the mill recently, came back from it, and then gets crucified for his first mistake after his comeback. Its not the one mistake he is being crucified for though is it, its his catalogue of errors over the years that have led us to this position, where the majority of fans think he is shite. I agree support is what he needs, if he is going to be playing on Saturday I hope he recieves a good welcome, let him know the fans are behind him fully and anyone who goes to the game and gives him abuse from the start, or are just waiting for the first dropped cross to give him pelters, then they are clearly not supporting the team, but this does not change the fact he is clearly not good enough, that not his fault, its the managers. But this a discussion message board so people will abuse the players when deserved, they will all have a different attitude at the game itself, as I doubt anyone deliberetly goes to a game with the mindset of wanting to abuse any players before the game has even started, and if they did they can fuck off and support someone else as far as I concerned. Link to comment
tup Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 I doubt anyone deliberetly goes to a game with the mindset of wanting to abuse any players before the game has even started RTYD, ebbe and sheepiekev do. But then they're a trio of cunts. 1 Link to comment
Tommy Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 RTYD, ebbe and sheepiekev do. But then they're a trio of cunts. I've got to step in here.Can't agree.I don't know sheepiekev. 3 Link to comment
Site Sponsor RTYD Posted August 8, 2012 Site Sponsor Share Posted August 8, 2012 Another huge extrapolation. I never said that. The poor bugger has been through the mill lately" Code for, "He shouldn't be judged so harshly as anyone else" Link to comment
sheepiekev Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 RTYD, ebbe and sheepiekev do. But then they're a trio of cunts. You wouldn't understand the concept "of going to games" on the grounds you are a part time cunt/full time nonce.You know fuck all about football, rendering your abuse meaningless Nice try though 1 Link to comment
Site Sponsor RTYD Posted August 8, 2012 Site Sponsor Share Posted August 8, 2012 RTYD, ebbe and sheepiekev do. But then they're a trio of cunts. You're speaking shite, but similar to Langfield we expect it. Link to comment
Site Sponsor RTYD Posted August 8, 2012 Site Sponsor Share Posted August 8, 2012 You wouldn't understand the concept "of going to games" on the grounds you are a part time cunt/full time nonce.You know fuck all about football, rendering your abuse meaningless Nice try though Kev, does he not attend games? Keyboard warrior eh? Link to comment
tup Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 The poor bugger has been through the mill lately" Code for, "He shouldn't be judged so harshly as anyone else" No, there's no hidden agenda, simply stating a fact. I ken how he feels. Link to comment
tup Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 Kev, does he not attend games? Keyboard warrior eh? Ignore 'kev'. He takes a tartan rug and a flask to games, wears a bunnet, and can eat a Kit-Kat without tearing the foil. He's never had a bird in his life. 1 1 Link to comment
Site Sponsor RTYD Posted August 8, 2012 Site Sponsor Share Posted August 8, 2012 Ignore 'kev'. He takes a tartan rug and a flask to games, wears a bunnet, and can eat a Kit-Kat without tearing the foil. He's never had a bird in his life. So you'll be at the game on Saturday then? Link to comment
tup Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 So you'll be at the game on Saturday then? No. My appeal fell on deaf ears. I'll be there on 1 September vs St Mirren. Link to comment
tommo1903 Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 Because someone within the club told me, which is good enough for me, and holds far more substance than you to be honest.And it was you that brought up the subject of assistant managers FFS! No it doesn't. If it was universal, then surely McGhee hated him also? I have a much better source than you. Link to comment
tup Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 Oooft! homo1903 owned by sheepish. Link to comment
Site Sponsor RTYD Posted August 8, 2012 Site Sponsor Share Posted August 8, 2012 No. My appeal fell on deaf ears. I'll be there on 1 September vs St Mirren. How many home games do you anticipate attending this season? Link to comment
tup Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 How many home games do you anticipate attending this season? Usual, about 10. Link to comment
Site Sponsor RTYD Posted August 8, 2012 Site Sponsor Share Posted August 8, 2012 Tup's point re clean slates for the start of a new season is one that I can understand. Indeed I referred to it earlier on the thread. Much as I was trying to be positive on Saturday, I was blocking out my true feelings towards Langfield. When he made his first save, gathering a low ball with his left hand - bread and butter really for any competent keeper - I was like "good man". Then he blocked a well hit shot - which was impossible for any professional to let in - I was also using this for solace and encouragement. In the second half, another good strike was easily palmed away but by now, I was getting nervous about him. These were not convincing saves. In a match where we were looking totally comfortable - cos Celtic are shit - it took an absolute howler to settle it. When that goal went in, all my true feelings poured out. The language that my son and I employed turned the air worse than blue, and there's nothing worse than blue. Langfield didn't deserve the clean slate that I was trying to give him. His previous is too long and he is too consistent in his shiteness. It is utter management incompetence that he was even in goals on Saturday and he should never play for us ever again. The Turd could not be polished. Stupid, stupid, stupid decision to keep him on. Link to comment
sheepiekev Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 No it doesn't. If it was universal, then surely McGhee hated him also? I have a much better source than you. McGhee was as big a cock as Leitch. Link to comment
diamondsr4ever Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 broon had the chance to ditch Langers, take in a loan for the season and keep brown as No1 to start, he didnt, aberdeen paid the price with langers after a flawless performance to a team that fukked us 9-1 little over a season or so ago. its nothing new Link to comment
sheepiekev Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 No. My appeal fell on deaf ears. I'll be there on 1 September vs St Mirren. Link to comment
Sonoftherock Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 Think everything's been said that can be said on this topic... All summer there has been speculation regarding who'd be our number one. All summer the vast majority of supporters have been appealing to Craig Brown not to install Langfield as number one. Every dons supporter is aware he's a disaster waiting happen. I even remember Stoney warning us all that he'd probably blow up again Celtic if he got the chance... I didn't think he'd drop a clanger that early, but it was always just a matter of time. Personally speaking, I thought our next visit to Tannadice would be the scene of the crime. It was like the ultimate slap in the face when that tame shot trundled under his hands. The reason it made me, and others, so angry is that it was completely avoidable. Langfield should not have been put in that position. We all know he's shite and he's certainly done nothing to suggest he deserves the jersey since returning from his illness. Just don't play him and we won't have to endure any more of this pish. I don't personally think Jason Brown is the answer, but he's a far better option than Clangers is right now. 2 Link to comment
Stoney Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 People still defending langfailed 1 Link to comment
super_al Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 You are blaming him solely for the defeat. Which means you're making him the scapegoat.Which is unfair. He lost us a point, to put things into some perspective. He won't be the only goalkeeper in Scotland who cost his team a point or two at the weekend. But he's the only one in Scotland facing savage criticism for his error. Tup I agree. Link to comment
super_al Posted August 8, 2012 Share Posted August 8, 2012 Bad news Tup, a proven retard agrees with you. Where to go from here? Really? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now