Jump to content

The Mckenna Dilemma


Recommended Posts


You said rangers paid for the pr story

 

Without any ambiguity

 

I think it's pretty fair asking where you heard that

 

Unless if course, it was a silly thing plucked out your arse?

They have a PR firm on retainer and have since they reformed.

 

Jim Traynor is the main figure.

 

(The SPFL also use the same firm I believe)

 

It's well know the Huns use PR much more heavily than all the other clubs. Mainly because they are run by criminals and con men and it's necessary to control the narrative.

 

Everyone knows this tbh. You doing for proof of x and y is pointless and proves nothing.

Link to comment

It's really going nuts down there now.

Theres players with absolutely no proven history at the top level being touted at 30-40m etc

Harry Maguire - 60-80m

Unreal.

Exactly why £10m (possibly with added appearances add ons) is the absolute minimum starting bids for McKenna or fk off.

That also includes 20/25% sell on clause. Depending on club, also add in an avoiding relegation etc. add on

Link to comment

It's really going nuts down there now.

 

Theres players with absolutely no proven history at the top level being touted at 30-40m etc

 

Harry Maguire - 60-80m

 

Unreal.

It's quite real though. Natural even, if unfortunate.

 

If we have £2/3 million coming in from a tv deal and advertising and are able to spend around a quarter of that on player transfer fees, the guff league cunts have £2/300 million coming in from similar sources and are easily able to spend a quarter of that on signings. It's probably quite natural that the market will inflate the standard players value by around ×100.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...