Jump to content

Welcome back Stephen Glass


Recommended Posts


Removing Glass won’t, in itself, cure the issue. 

An experienced assistant manager needs to come in along with an experienced DoF.

Maybe those 2 roles could be the done by one person? 

Irrespective of whether it’s one or two blokes doing those roles, it would give Glass a far better platform to build on.

Inexperience all over the place at the mo

Link to comment
7 minutes ago, sooth_stander said:

Removing Glass won’t, in itself, cure the issue. 

An experienced assistant manager needs to come in along with an experienced DoF.

Maybe those 2 roles could be the done by one person? 

Irrespective of whether it’s one or two blokes doing those roles, it would give Glass a far better platform to build on.

Inexperience all over the place at the mo

Is there not a case that we have to allow them to gain experience? Learn from mistakes. There's risk attached with any appointment. 

Link to comment
19 hours ago, Ernie McCracken said:

I find it pretty depressing that DC will allow October to play it out for the sake of it. But if that is what he's gonna do then he damn well better be using October to put plans for a replacement in place so the new manager can start working towards January to start fixing the fucking mess Glass created in the summer. 

Which manager do you think would come in and get a successful return of results in October? 

Link to comment
20 minutes ago, RUL said:

Is there not a case that we have to allow them to gain experience? Learn from mistakes. There's risk attached with any appointment. 

Agreed in Glass’ case (to a degree) but you wouldn’t run any business or organisation with inexperience at every level within the core function.

An inexperienced manager surrendered by inexperience, including the chairman, is a recipe for disaster, as appears to be prevailing 

Link to comment
22 minutes ago, RUL said:

Is there not a case that we have to allow them to gain experience? Learn from mistakes. There's risk attached with any appointment. 

Take a risk with one of them and give an inexperienced guy a chance maybe, but not both at the same time.

It’s clear as day that everything on the football side of things is being run poorly at the moment. Recruitment, tactics, results have all been really poor.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
24 minutes ago, RUL said:

Is there not a case that we have to allow them to gain experience? Learn from mistakes. There's risk attached with any appointment. 

Yes.

An experienced manager will probably just mean route 1, 4th and no cups. 

Lets give this idiot centre midfield signing fanatic a go at creating a team who play football and win games. He's made a cunt of it so far but we'll be flying soon enough.... Mon the Glass.

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
7 minutes ago, Byrne Baby Byrne said:

Yes.

An experienced manager will probably just mean route 1, 4th and no cups. 

Lets give this idiot centre midfield signing fanatic a go at creating a team who play football and win games. He's made a cunt of it so far but we'll be flying soon enough.... Mon the Glass.

That’s the spirit. ?

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Andy_123 said:

Take a risk with one of them and give an inexperienced guy a chance maybe, but not both at the same time.

It’s clear as day that everything on the football side of things is being run poorly at the moment. Recruitment, tactics, results have all been really poor.

Add disjointed starting line-ups, bizarre formations, and poor substitutions, and that is why we find ourselves in the predicament we are currently in. 

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, Kincardine_Mearns_Red said:

His track record speaks for itself. Dismal..............

There are managers who have worked at lower levels with a far higher hit rate than Stephen who clearly were never considered as part of the prawcess - it's a DC fuckup - came into football thinking he could make it all happen by force of personality and not by actual ability or experience and clearly can't have listened to any advice he didn't agree with - the mess of signings and football mistakes are all ultimately DCs fault - what will happen when he gets bored of his fantasy football experiment? Aberdeen FC are in a precarious place and I don't know that DC has the skill (and courage - because he'll have to undo some of his previous decisions) to get us out of it (given his previous bottling of comparatively simple things like Q&A sessions there are grounds for scepticism).  I'd love SG to succeed and somehow umpteen central midfielders and few centre backs, wingers or strikers to be the new model for football. he may just be a wee bit ahead of his time.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
4 hours ago, afc1903mad said:

Which manager do you think would come in and get a successful return of results in October? 

Interesting question in the way it has been framed. 

The sooner we sack him, the sooner we can get a replacement and the sooner said replacement can get to work. That October is a tough run games should not be an excuse to say fuck it let's not do anything. Anyway why should we write off October, just because we think the run of games looks tough. 

And to answer your question any one of the other managers in the SPL would make a better fist of it than Glass. 

Link to comment
26 minutes ago, WesthillWanderersFC said:

Plenty managers would be able to organise & structure a team better than SG I’d think. 

I don’t think we’ve been that bad, certainly not clinical enough.

In the games we’ve lost, we’ve dominated the games and had the chances to go ahead.

So after only 7 games of the campaign, it’s far too early to dismiss that the problem is beyond fixing.

Link to comment
50 minutes ago, Ernie McCracken said:

Interesting question in the way it has been framed. 

The sooner we sack him, the sooner we can get a replacement and the sooner said replacement can get to work. That October is a tough run games should not be an excuse to say fuck it let's not do anything. Anyway why should we write off October, just because we think the run of games looks tough. 

And to answer your question any one of the other managers in the SPL would make a better fist of it than Glass. 

October is deemed tough because we will play SevCo, Celtic and Hibs.

 

SevCo have only been beaten once in the league, by Tam Courts United. Who we dominated and beat soundly when they came to Pittodrie.

Hibs have yet to be beaten in the league, so no other manager has been able to get a win over Ross

Celtic have been beaten three times so far, Hearts on the opening day (Hearts could not beat us and we’re lucky in the end to get a draw), Livingston (whom we beat, albeit to a goalkeeping error, but otherwise we dominated) and to SevCo themselves. They also dished out a couple of 6-0 thrashings to St Mirren (who only beat us as we were down to 10 men) and Dundee (were yet to play them)

 

I’m not seeing where your misbelief that ANY of the other SPL managers would make a better fist of it.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Ernie McCracken said:

Interesting question in the way it has been framed. 

The sooner we sack him, the sooner we can get a replacement and the sooner said replacement can get to work. That October is a tough run games should not be an excuse to say fuck it let's not do anything. Anyway why should we write off October, just because we think the run of games looks tough. 

And to answer your question any one of the other managers in the SPL would make a better fist of it than Glass. 

Apart from the 4 who didn't manage to beat us i presume?

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...