In the News

[For Fecks Sake]

9 hours ago, shut up meg said:

Some bloke was lifted in Aberdeen for having eggs on him, another bloke in London was asked for his details as he had a blank piece of paper  

It's fucking nuts

Most likely Peter Dow, well known anti royalist and general fruit loop.

[Joe pike]

4 minutes ago, For Fecks Sake said:

Most likely Peter Dow, well known anti royalist and general fruit loop.

Could have been Consi.

[manboobs109]

1 hour ago, CCB III said:

Authoritarian, then. 
 

I think that's fair to say. Especially with that Crime and Police Bill everyone seems to have forgotten. 

Used to its best effect at the Prince Andrew heckler. 
 

Brits are a sick minded people, in my opinion. Base their national identity off the colonisation and repressive nature of the empire, but can't see how that in turn represses them. 
 

What kind of a people put up with an unelected head of state that gets to scoop up their tax money for merely existing? For born out the right fud. 

 

 

 

Doesn't apply in Scotland min. Agree with the sentiment though.

[Ke1t]

Would love to smack a royal with a well aimed egg. 

Would be worth the jail time ?

No plans to do so, of course. 

 

@Police

[Ohjimmyjimmy]

Does attending the funeral procession make you a Royalist now?

I don’t particularly care for much of the Royal Family nor would you find me waving a Union Jack or rushing to the defence of the Union - but I’m not demanding we are made a republic either.

I took tho kids down to see off the Queen as she left Balmoral - a small part of history witnessed, not to proclaim our allegiance to the crown.

As for throwing eggs at a hearse or heckling a funeral procession - pretty scummy behaviour if you ask me, no matter who is in the box.

[Kilgore Trout]

2 hours ago, CCB III said:

Authoritarian, then. 
 

I think that's fair to say. Especially with that Crime and Police Bill everyone seems to have forgotten. 

Used to its best effect at the Prince Andrew heckler. 
 

Brits are a sick minded people, in my opinion. Base their national identity off the colonisation and repressive nature of the empire, but can't see how that in turn represses them. 
 

What kind of a people put up with an unelected head of state that gets to scoop up their tax money for merely existing? For born out the right fud. 

 

 

 

Just good old Scottish been around for centuries breach of the peace min. Despite James O’Brien jumping on the freedom of speech debate and I agree with the right to do so the guy screaming at Prince Andrew was arguably guilty of that highly debatable and nebulous crime.

Woman with the sign certainly wasn’t unless she was screaming blue murder although that’s what I think she has been charged with which is a nonsense 

[Joe pike]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-62894037
 

One down,seven to go for Mendy.

[Poodler]

26 minutes ago, Joe pike said:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-62894037
 

One down,seven to go for Mendy.

Ha!

if he gets off with them all he will be pretty aggrieved for that year in the slammer

 

enthusiastically ???

[Parklife]

47 minutes ago, Ohjimmyjimmy said:

 

I took tho kids down to see off the Queen as she left Balmoral 

Terrible parenting. 

[Don Fonte]

7 minutes ago, Poodler said:

Ha!

if he gets off with them all he will be pretty aggrieved for that year in the slammer

 

enthusiastically ???

The slut should be locked up.

[Poodler]

2 minutes ago, Don Fonte said:

The slut should be locked up.

Agreed bro. Tried to get rich.

[Joe pike]

14 minutes ago, Poodler said:

Ha!

if he gets off with them all he will be pretty aggrieved for that year in the slammer

 

enthusiastically ???

He would snap a 12 month sentence right now.

Looking at 20 years I would think.

[Parklife]

8 minutes ago, Joe pike said:

He would snap a 12 month sentence right now.

Looking at 20 years I would think.

You a legal professional, Joe Boy? 

[Don Fonte]

9 minutes ago, Poodler said:

Agreed bro. Tried to get rich.

Although if she's that 'enthusiastic' I wouldn't mind a shot first.

[CCB III]

2 hours ago, manboobs109 said:

Doesn't apply in Scotland min. Agree with the sentiment though.

No, in Scotland there's pishy wee laws like you can't have a tin on a train ?

 

Petty, puritanical authoritarianism. Maybe not as concerning but certainly fucking annoying. 

[For Fecks Sake]

1 hour ago, Ohjimmyjimmy said:

Does attending the funeral procession make you a Royalist now?

I don’t particularly care for much of the Royal Family nor would you find me waving a Union Jack or rushing to the defence of the Union - but I’m not demanding we are made a republic either.

I took tho kids down to see off the Queen as she left Balmoral - a small part of history witnessed, not to proclaim our allegiance to the crown.

As for throwing eggs at a hearse or heckling a funeral procession - pretty scummy behaviour if you ask me, no matter who is in the box.

^ This

Can you imagine the uproar on here if a Hun were to throw an egg off of say, SAF, coffin when he pops his clogs?

 

[CCB III]

2 hours ago, Ohjimmyjimmy said:

Does attending the funeral procession make you a Royalist now?

I don’t particularly care for much of the Royal Family nor would you find me waving a Union Jack or rushing to the defence of the Union - but I’m not demanding we are made a republic either.

I took tho kids down to see off the Queen as she left Balmoral - a small part of history witnessed, not to proclaim our allegiance to the crown.

As for throwing eggs at a hearse or heckling a funeral procession - pretty scummy behaviour if you ask me, no matter who is in the box.

If she had paid to get her son off with facing justice for the sexual assault of your kid, would you say the same thing? 

Or is that not to be considered when we discuss "scummy behaviour?" 
 

Been reading lots of opinions on the matter the last few days, some old and some new. But, as often happened, the Hitch got it right. 
 

""What should now begin is the process of emancipating ourselves from the mental habits of royalism, and the many supports it provides to unthinking attitudes and dysfunctional practices"
 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/dec/06/monarchy.features11?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

 

Whilst you're not outright pledging your allegiance to the crown, or for a republic, you are giving credence to what is a regressive tradition that stains the minds and capacity for class consciousness in this country. 
 

I get why you'd think "it was a bit of history" and I suppose, when people die- they do become a part of history. But, I don't think you can participate with it, even from an apathetic viewpoint, and not be giving credence to the hysteria and outright debasing of personal dignity millions of people in this country are being propagandised into justifying/doing right now.

 

You've taken your kids to see a 96 year old, dead billionaire, who wouldn't have given any of you a second thought. 
 

There is no apolitical way to do that, you are, whether you mean it or not, justifying the nonsense undemocratic, fair minded people are having to endure. 
 

 

 

 

[CCB III]

9 minutes ago, For Fecks Sake said:

^ This

Can you imagine the uproar on here if a Hun were to throw an egg off of say, SAF, coffin when he pops his clogs?

 

The fact that you'd suggest that's in any way the same to the death of the Queen begs the question once again; 

 

What the fuck did you get a degree in, and where!?

[Redforever86]

13 minutes ago, CCB III said:

The fact that you'd suggest that's in any way the same to the death of the Queen begs the question once again; 

 

What the fuck did you get a degree in, and where!?

If SAF paid to get his Son aff with raping a child I'd be happy for anyone to chucks eggs at his hearse, or shout mean things. 

 

[CCB III]

13 minutes ago, Redforever86 said:

If SAF paid to get his Son aff with raping a child I'd be happy for anyone to chucks eggs at his hearse, or shout mean things. 

 

Jokes aside, saying the death of a monarch= the death of a football manager. 
 

Dumbest oversimplification ever. 
 

 

[Poodler]

32 minutes ago, CCB III said:

If she had paid to get her son off with facing justice for the sexual assault of your kid, would you say the same thing? 

Or is that not to be considered when we discuss "scummy behaviour?" 
 

Been reading lots of opinions on the matter the last few days, some old and some new. But, as often happened, the Hitch got it right. 
 

""What should now begin is the process of emancipating ourselves from the mental habits of royalism, and the many supports it provides to unthinking attitudes and dysfunctional practices"
 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/dec/06/monarchy.features11?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

 

Whilst you're not outright pledging your allegiance to the crown, or for a republic, you are giving credence to what is a regressive tradition that stains the minds and capacity for class consciousness in this country. 
 

I get why you'd think "it was a bit of history" and I suppose, when people die- they do become a part of history. But, I don't think you can participate with it, even from a non critical viewpoint, and not be giving credence to the hysteria and outright debasing of personal dignity millions of people in this country are being propagandised into justifying/doing right now.

 

You've taken your kids to see a 96 year old, dead billionaire, who wouldn't have given any of you a second thought. 
 

There is no apolitical way to do that, you are, whether you mean it or not, justifying the nonsense us democratic, fair minded people are having to endure. 
 

 

 

 

On a roll champ ?

[frankie_mac's_4]

1 hour ago, CCB III said:

If she had paid to get her son off with facing justice for the sexual assault of your kid, would you say the same thing? 

Or is that not to be considered when we discuss "scummy behaviour?" 
 

Been reading lots of opinions on the matter the last few days, some old and some new. But, as often happened, the Hitch got it right. 
 

""What should now begin is the process of emancipating ourselves from the mental habits of royalism, and the many supports it provides to unthinking attitudes and dysfunctional practices"
 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/dec/06/monarchy.features11?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

 

Whilst you're not outright pledging your allegiance to the crown, or for a republic, you are giving credence to what is a regressive tradition that stains the minds and capacity for class consciousness in this country. 
 

I get why you'd think "it was a bit of history" and I suppose, when people die- they do become a part of history. But, I don't think you can participate with it, even from an apathetic viewpoint, and not be giving credence to the hysteria and outright debasing of personal dignity millions of people in this country are being propagandised into justifying/doing right now.

 

You've taken your kids to see a 96 year old, dead billionaire, who wouldn't have given any of you a second thought. 
 

There is no apolitical way to do that, you are, whether you mean it or not, justifying the nonsense undemocratic, fair minded people are having to endure. 
 

 

 

 

It was a lovely service they put on,TBF

[Simply Red]

1 hour ago, CCB III said:

There is no apolitical way to do that, you are, whether you mean it or not, justifying the nonsense undemocratic, fair minded people are having to endure. 
 

 

 

 

What if he had his ballsack casually hanging out his spaver when the cortege went past? 
 

 

[CCB III]

1 minute ago, Simply Red said:

What if he had his ballsack casually hanging out his spaver when the cortege went past? 
 

 

Might've let him off. 
 

 

Only if he had written FTQ in sharpie pen. 

[CCB III]

1 hour ago, CCB III said:

If she had paid to get her son off with facing justice for the sexual assault of your kid, would you say the same thing? 

Or is that not to be considered when we discuss "scummy behaviour?" 
 

Been reading lots of opinions on the matter the last few days, some old and some new. But, as often happened, the Hitch got it right. 
 

""What should now begin is the process of emancipating ourselves from the mental habits of royalism, and the many supports it provides to unthinking attitudes and dysfunctional practices"
 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/dec/06/monarchy.features11?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

 

Whilst you're not outright pledging your allegiance to the crown, or for a republic, you are giving credence to what is a regressive tradition that stains the minds and capacity for class consciousness in this country. 
 

I get why you'd think "it was a bit of history" and I suppose, when people die- they do become a part of history. But, I don't think you can participate with it, even from an apathetic viewpoint, and not be giving credence to the hysteria and outright debasing of personal dignity millions of people in this country are being propagandised into justifying/doing right now.

 

You've taken your kids to see a 96 year old, dead billionaire, who wouldn't have given any of you a second thought. 
 

There is no apolitical way to do that, you are, whether you mean it or not, justifying the nonsense undemocratic, fair minded people are having to endure. 
 

 

 

 

Us democratic, not "undemocratic."

[Guest Grays Babylon 1875]

33 minutes ago, CCB III said:

Us democratic, not "undemocratic."

Don't worry. 

Noone reads your posts.

[Misers Hill]

2 hours ago, CCB III said:

Jokes aside, saying the death of a monarch= the death of a football manager. 
 

Dumbest oversimplification ever. 
 

 

Fack aff. .twit .?.. here's you an greysack?......?

 

[manboobs109]

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/sep/13/king-charles-staff-given-redundancy-notice-during-church-service-for-queen

@CCB III

What you making of this?

[For Fecks Sake]

7 hours ago, CCB III said:

Dumbest oversimplification ever. 

Well had to pitch it at a level you could understand Consi!

[For Fecks Sake]

8 hours ago, CCB III said:

If she had paid to get her son off with facing justice for the sexual assault of your kid, would you say the same thing? 

Or is that not to be considered when we discuss "scummy behaviour?" 
 

Been reading lots of opinions on the matter the last few days, some old and some new. But, as often happened, the Hitch got it right. 
 

""What should now begin is the process of emancipating ourselves from the mental habits of royalism, and the many supports it provides to unthinking attitudes and dysfunctional practices"
 

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/dec/06/monarchy.features11?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

 

Whilst you're not outright pledging your allegiance to the crown, or for a republic, you are giving credence to what is a regressive tradition that stains the minds and capacity for class consciousness in this country. 
 

I get why you'd think "it was a bit of history" and I suppose, when people die- they do become a part of history. But, I don't think you can participate with it, even from an apathetic viewpoint, and not be giving credence to the hysteria and outright debasing of personal dignity millions of people in this country are being propagandised into justifying/doing right now.

 

You've taken your kids to see a 96 year old, dead billionaire, who wouldn't have given any of you a second thought. 
 

There is no apolitical way to do that, you are, whether you mean it or not, justifying the nonsense undemocratic, fair minded people are having to endure.

If you put as much thought and effort as you do into posting into a job, you may not be living rent free in one of your relatives flats and doing a job that you dislike.