Dons79 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 2.5/3 million euros would be very disappointing on last years performance 1 Link to comment
BaldurBett Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Link to comment
DelMonte Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 I love him but 3 million for someone who’s only performed for 5 months out of 1.5 years isn’t bad. Link to comment
minijc Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 3 minutes ago, DelMonte said: I love him but 3 million for someone who’s only performed for 5 months out of 1.5 years isn’t bad. That's a bit harsh is it nae. 7 Link to comment
milne_afc Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Just now, minijc said: That's a bit harsh is it nae. It’s complete rubbish 1 3 Link to comment
WesthillWanderersFC Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 3 minutes ago, DelMonte said: I love him but 3 million for someone who’s only performed for 5 months out of 1.5 years isn’t bad. It’s only €1.5m though after we pay Benfica 50%, so about £1.35m 1 Link to comment
AyrshireSheep Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 I suppose the club must know whether he is interested in a new contract or not. Surely they'll have sounded him/his agent out. If they haven't shown any interest in it then its maybe not a bad deal. He's only got 18 months left. I'd still be looking for a bit more considering we are giving half of the fee away allegedly. Link to comment
RabidGiraffe Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 2 minutes ago, WesthillWanderersFC said: It’s only €1.5m though after we pay Benfica 50%, so about £1.35m I thought the 50% clause had been debunked? Link to comment
minijc Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 3 minutes ago, RabidGiraffe said: I thought the 50% clause had been debunked? There was talk that we paid £300k for him to help reduce the percentage but knowing just how glaiket our esteemed Director of Football is, it wouldn't surprise me we paid the £300k on top and it's a 60% sell on fee. 1 Link to comment
WesthillWanderersFC Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 4 minutes ago, RabidGiraffe said: I thought the 50% clause had been debunked? Goodwin mentioned it so presumably he’d know. Link to comment
Hoppy Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Let's hope the Championship club bids £5m. Link to comment
Willo flood Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 7 minutes ago, RabidGiraffe said: I thought the 50% clause had been debunked? People thought that because we payed a fee for him but both Scott Burns and Fabrizio Romano have said there is a 50% clause Link to comment
Willo flood Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 minute ago, Hoppy said: Let's hope the Championship club bids £5m. Hoping for a mass biding war 3 Link to comment
RabidGiraffe Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 4 minutes ago, minijc said: There was talk that we paid £300k for him to help reduce the percentage but knowing just how glaiket our esteemed Director of Football is, it wouldn't surprise me we paid the £300k on top and it's a 60% sell on fee. I thought I'd seen Cormack saying we'd paid a fee and the sell on wasn't that high 4 minutes ago, WesthillWanderersFC said: Goodwin mentioned it so presumably he’d know. Hmm... who to believe? Goodwin who thought the likes of Stewart and Richardson would be good defenders for Aberdeen or the guy that appointed both him and Robson? Tough choice. Link to comment
Dandys1983 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 12 minutes ago, WesthillWanderersFC said: It’s only €1.5m though after we pay Benfica 50%, so about £1.35m Take it, he's been more cold that hot. Can't see them getting there money back if Im honest 1 Link to comment
RabidGiraffe Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Losing both Duk and Miovski in this window would be a worry. It is possible both could be subject to offers "too big to refuse" 1 Link to comment
Baaaaa heid Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 So the evening express have gave us there hasn’t been contact from young boys just like no contact from lecce for rama story so he is off at some point in the window then Link to comment
aberdeen1970 Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 1 minute ago, RabidGiraffe said: Losing both Duk and Miovski in this window would be a worry. It is possible both could be subject to offers "too big to refuse" We really need to spread these sales out though or try and hold both off until the summer. We've made decent coin from Europe and we've got a lot of work to do second half of the season Losing both of them in the January window would be kamikaze stuff. 2 Link to comment
Mouzer Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Just now, aberdeen1970 said: We really need to spread these sales out though or try and hold both off until the summer. We've made decent coin from Europe and we've got a lot of work to do second half of the season Losing both of them in the January window would be kamikaze stuff. Be aright with Pape and Sokler 🤨 1 Link to comment
RabidGiraffe Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 7 minutes ago, aberdeen1970 said: We really need to spread these sales out though or try and hold both off until the summer. We've made decent coin from Europe and we've got a lot of work to do second half of the season Losing both of them in the January window would be kamikaze stuff. I agree, but if there's clubs willing to shell out big fees, can we refuse? I know technically we can refuse because we don't need to sell, but if it's big money and from clubs the players want to go to, will we say no? Link to comment
JamieMT Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 3 minutes ago, aberdeen1970 said: We really need to spread these sales out though or try and hold both off until the summer. We've made decent coin from Europe and we've got a lot of work to do second half of the season Losing both of them in the January window would be kamikaze stuff. Wouldn't disagree with a word of that. Unfortunately if the money's right they'll both leave during this window. Just have to hope no club bids whatever number's deemed sufficient to trigger a sale. Link to comment
NEM Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 €2.5 - €3 million if the 50% sell on clause is true is absolute peanuts. Rather just run down his contract Link to comment
Baaaaa heid Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 3 minutes ago, NEM said: €2.5 - €3 million if the 50% sell on clause is true is absolute peanuts. Rather just run down his contract That’s Stuart Milne type thinking that Link to comment
scottymc Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 3 million!? Fuck off. That’s a shit decision by the club if true. Genuinely that is fucking pish. It wouldn’t surprise me though. 1 Link to comment
NEM Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 5 minutes ago, Baaaaa heid said: That’s Stuart Milne type thinking that Stewart Milne thinking is grab the first bit of cash that’s offered Link to comment
JamieMT Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 Duk would be a £250k man on Milne's watch. Link to comment
Baaaaa heid Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 3 minutes ago, scottymc said: 3 million!? Fuck off. That’s a shit decision by the club if true. Genuinely that is fucking pish. It wouldn’t surprise me though. Maybe its him that wants the move so maybe any offers over 3 mil we are listening to them , but until there is something more concrete other than the dreaded evening express no contact report there no point panicking just yet Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now