minijc Posted December 29, 2022 Share Posted December 29, 2022 7 minutes ago, Roberto said: What did the loud mouth baldy dude do in Romania? Human trafficking Link to comment
CCB III Posted December 29, 2022 Share Posted December 29, 2022 6 minutes ago, minijc said: Human trafficking Funny Assuming he goes down, it'll just leave a vacuum for another of his ilk, and the economy of outrage that the internet loves will have harmony restored. Anyone who takes what he says seriously is a fucking mong. And I mean arguing in defence of him or against him. An unserious person that should have no cultural relevance. Link to comment
Guest milne_afc Posted December 29, 2022 Share Posted December 29, 2022 Gr8 work by Greta(Gr8a) RW har-de-har boys choking on their clichéd drivel. Link to comment
CCB III Posted December 29, 2022 Share Posted December 29, 2022 Just now, milne_afc said: Gr8 work by Greta(Gr8a) RW har-de-har boys choking on their clichéd drivel. He's more or less got a cult with the pyramid scheme he started. He might well manage to spin it that it's the powers that be acting against what he says. "New world agenda" or some shit. His arrest will probably legitimise him further to the impressionable morons who hang on his every word. He's the king we deserve. Link to comment
Guest milne_afc Posted December 29, 2022 Share Posted December 29, 2022 3 minutes ago, CCB III said: He's the king we deserve Speak for yourself. I’d have him k***ed! Link to comment
minijc Posted December 29, 2022 Share Posted December 29, 2022 4 minutes ago, CCB III said: He's more or less got a cult with the pyramid scheme he started. He might well manage to spin it that it's the powers that be acting against what he says. "New world agenda" or some shit. His arrest will probably legitimise him further to the impressionable morons who hang on his every word. He's the king we deserve. https://twitter.com/LayahHeilpern/status/1608591846086946816?s=20&t=iCEubFjGKt0KMENboTxVhA Link to comment
CCB III Posted December 29, 2022 Share Posted December 29, 2022 2 minutes ago, milne_afc said: Speak for yourself. I’d have him k***ed! 😂 Are you just being the antidote to Poodler now he's watched some YouTube with Bri round the pool? Link to comment
CCB III Posted December 29, 2022 Share Posted December 29, 2022 3 minutes ago, minijc said: https://twitter.com/LayahHeilpern/status/1608591846086946816?s=20&t=iCEubFjGKt0KMENboTxVhA There you go. Like clockwork. Link to comment
Parklife Posted December 29, 2022 Share Posted December 29, 2022 Greta. Saving the world and bringing down scumbags. Ledge. ❤️ Link to comment
Howard Marks Posted December 29, 2022 Share Posted December 29, 2022 44 minutes ago, Zeus said: Scamdemics over It's yet to really begin. Link to comment
maryhilldon Posted December 29, 2022 Share Posted December 29, 2022 Never heard of him. Link to comment
red kelly Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 there used to be a peer reviewd paper on the potential of shedding through vaccine.which i thought was an interesting idea. it was one of the medical journals i read back in 2016, strangely ,i can no longer find this paper, anyone point me to the study?.thank you. i suspect its been removed by the censors. in the meantime, https://rumble.com/v22x0rs-latest-update-on-vaccine-on-alarming-transfer-to-others-with-dr-mccullough.html 3 Link to comment
Guest milne_afc Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 You were reading medical journals in 2016? Link to comment
Guest Grays Babylon 1875 Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 1 hour ago, maryhilldon said: Never heard of him. Same. Googled him. Death penalty in Romania please. Link to comment
red kelly Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 1 hour ago, milne_afc said: You were reading medical journals in 2016? yip, it was not long after bill gates was talking in an odd way about vaccines, cant remember how i got there,may have been 2017, but the peer reviewed work was there back then for sure. of course it was about the potential to advance vaccination, nothing definitive, interesting all the same. sadly with todays censorship its no doubt been buried. no doubt some will claim its a false statement or a lie, that's ok knock yourself out ,the article is out there somewhere. ive tried the journal, lancet etc,but with no luck. back on track. here's dr naomi wolf. https://rumble.com/v230kr0-one-of-five-stroke-sufferers-post-mrna-vaccine-died.-pfizer-documents.html 1 Link to comment
Parklife Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 9 minutes ago, red kelly said: back on track. here's dr naomi wolf. Haha. Link to comment
red kelly Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 8 minutes ago, Parklife said: Haha. very good,you stick to netflex and the open book that is google, then go back to sleep,safe and effective remember. , nothing to trigger you here. Link to comment
The Gee Man Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 42 minutes ago, Zeus said: Free Andy Tate Can’t imagine there is anything free about him. Link to comment
The Gee Man Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 3 hours ago, Bad_Mobby said: Surely it’s Greta’s mum or dad coming up with the quips? Tbf seen them in an interview a few years back, I doubt it. Link to comment
Zeus Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 2 minutes ago, The Gee Man said: Can’t imagine there is anything free about him. Taken down by the establishment iyam Link to comment
The Gee Man Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 2 minutes ago, Zeus said: Taken down by the establishment iyam If it’s true should be put down Link to comment
Parklife Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 6 hours ago, red kelly said: very good,you stick to netflex and the open book that is google, then go back to sleep,safe and effective remember. , nothing to trigger you here. "Dr Naomi Wolf" 😂😂 Link to comment
Reed or deed Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 6 hours ago, red kelly said: very good,you stick to netflex and the open book that is google, then go back to sleep,safe and effective remember. , nothing to trigger you here. U wot m8? Link to comment
Zeus Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 23 minutes ago, The Gee Man said: If it’s true should be put down The establishment? I AGREE! Link to comment
The Gee Man Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 4 minutes ago, Zeus said: The establishment? I AGREE! Very proletariat Link to comment
Zeus Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 Don't know what that means Link to comment
Jocky Balboa Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 On 12/29/2022 at 10:28 AM, Parklife said: Like what? I was just showing how daft your anecdotal musings were. I've not known a single person who's had any issues after taking a jag. I made no definitive conclusion, only that for all who parrot the "safe and effective" line, I know personally of a few people who experienced anaphylactic shock and immune system problems respectively. Whether they are isolated cases, time will tell, hence my closing "as more data emerges..." comment, which you glossed over. What does differentiate myself and many others like me, is our default position was one of scepticism; neither buying the official narrative verbatim, nor falling into hardline conspiracy theory (in such divisive issues, history usually finds truth somewhere in the middle). What I won't do, is unquestioningly put my faith in the company who paid the biggest criminal (yes CRIMINAL, not civil) fine in history, when they insist I take an experimental shot, with no long-term data. I also note the moving goalposts from mainstream media, politicians, Big Tech and Big Pharma et al. - They started by saying vulnerable groups would be the focus, then the rest would weigh up the risks for themselves and make a choice based on INFORMED CONSENT (note the Nuremberg Code). - When restrictions continued, long after the experimental shots were rolled out to all the vulnerable groups, was that not suspicious for the believers? - Then they started to coerce and bully, threaten jobs and livelihoods, even excluding from parts of society, those who declined. - Rather than debate and debunk those who challenged Fauci et al, they deplatformed them. That is NOT science, it is propaganda. - Then when many jabbed still caught it, they said "it's a few breakthrough cases", nothing to see here. - When jabbed continued to shed/transmit, they said "erm, well we didn't say it would stop you getting it... or spreading it!" - Then they insisted people would need to keep boosting, as it wasn't that effective after all. - Now they insist they never said the shots would eradicate the virus (in many cases, they damn well did!) - Snivelling establishment arselickers like Piers Morgan backtrack and try to wriggle out of their previous authoritarian stance and they are getting away with it. 2 4 Link to comment
Don Fonte Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 53 minutes ago, Jocky Balboa said: I made no definitive conclusion, only that for all who parrot the "safe and effective" line, I know personally of a few people who experienced anaphylactic shock and immune system problems respectively. Whether they are isolated cases, time will tell, hence my closing "as more data emerges..." comment, which you glossed over. What does differentiate myself and many others like me, is our default position was one of scepticism; neither buying the official narrative verbatim, nor falling into hardline conspiracy theory (in such divisive issues, history usually finds truth somewhere in the middle). What I won't do, is unquestioningly put my faith in the company who paid the biggest criminal (yes CRIMINAL, not civil) fine in history, when they insist I take an experimental shot, with no long-term data. I also note the moving goalposts from mainstream media, politicians, Big Tech and Big Pharma et al. - They started by saying vulnerable groups would be the focus, then the rest would weigh up the risks for themselves and make a choice based on INFORMED CONSENT (note the Nuremberg Code). - When restrictions continued, long after the experimental shots were rolled out to all the vulnerable groups, was that not suspicious for the believers? - Then they started to coerce and bully, threaten jobs and livelihoods, even excluding from parts of society, those who declined. - Rather than debate and debunk those who challenged Fauci et al, they deplatformed them. That is NOT science, it is propaganda. - Then when many jabbed still caught it, they said "it's a few breakthrough cases", nothing to see here. - When jabbed continued to shed/transmit, they said "erm, well we didn't say it would stop you getting it... or spreading it!" - Then they insisted people would need to keep boosting, as it wasn't that effective after all. - Now they insist they never said the shots would eradicate the virus (in many cases, they damn well did!) - Snivelling establishment arselickers like Piers Morgan backtrack and try to wriggle out of their previous authoritarian stance and they are getting away with it. NRT Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now