Coronavirus

[minijc]

7 minutes ago, Roberto said:

What did the loud mouth baldy dude do in Romania?

Human trafficking 

[CCB III]

6 minutes ago, minijc said:

Human trafficking 

Funny 

 

Assuming he goes down, it'll just leave a vacuum for another of his ilk, and the economy of outrage that the internet loves will have harmony restored. 
 

Anyone who takes what he says seriously is a fucking mong. And I mean arguing in defence of him or against him. 
 

An unserious person that should have no cultural relevance. 

 

[Guest milne_afc]

Gr8 work by Greta(Gr8a)

RW har-de-har boys choking on their clichéd drivel.

[CCB III]

Just now, milne_afc said:

Gr8 work by Greta(Gr8a)

RW har-de-har boys choking on their clichéd drivel.

He's more or less got a cult with the pyramid scheme he started. 
 

He might well manage to spin it that it's the powers that be acting against what he says. "New world agenda" or some shit. 
 

His arrest will probably legitimise him further to the impressionable morons who hang on his every word. 
 

He's the king we deserve. 

[Guest milne_afc]

3 minutes ago, CCB III said:

He's the king we deserve

Speak for yourself. I’d have him k***ed!

[minijc]

4 minutes ago, CCB III said:

He's more or less got a cult with the pyramid scheme he started. 
 

He might well manage to spin it that it's the powers that be acting against what he says. "New world agenda" or some shit. 
 

His arrest will probably legitimise him further to the impressionable morons who hang on his every word. 
 

He's the king we deserve. 

https://twitter.com/LayahHeilpern/status/1608591846086946816?s=20&t=iCEubFjGKt0KMENboTxVhA

[CCB III]

2 minutes ago, milne_afc said:

Speak for yourself. I’d have him k***ed!

😂

 

Are you just being the antidote to Poodler now he's watched some YouTube with Bri round the pool?

[CCB III]

3 minutes ago, minijc said:

https://twitter.com/LayahHeilpern/status/1608591846086946816?s=20&t=iCEubFjGKt0KMENboTxVhA

There you go. 
 

Like clockwork. 

[Zeus]

Scamdemics over

[Parklife]

Greta. Saving the world and bringing down scumbags. 

Ledge. ❤️

[Howard Marks]

44 minutes ago, Zeus said:

Scamdemics over

It's yet to really begin.

[maryhilldon]

Never heard of him.

[red kelly]

there used to be a peer reviewd paper on the potential of shedding through vaccine.which i thought was an interesting idea.

it was one of the medical journals i read back in 2016, strangely ,i can no longer find this paper, anyone point me to the study?.thank you.
i suspect its been removed by the censors.

in the meantime, https://rumble.com/v22x0rs-latest-update-on-vaccine-on-alarming-transfer-to-others-with-dr-mccullough.html
 

[Guest milne_afc]

You were reading medical journals in 2016? 

[Guest Grays Babylon 1875]

1 hour ago, maryhilldon said:

Never heard of him.

Same.

Googled him.

Death penalty in Romania please.

[red kelly]

1 hour ago, milne_afc said:

You were reading medical journals in 2016? 

yip, it was not long after bill gates was talking in an odd way about vaccines, cant remember how i got there,may have been 2017, but the peer reviewed work was there back then for sure.
of course it was about the potential to advance vaccination, nothing definitive, interesting all the same.

sadly  with todays censorship its no doubt been  buried.

 

no doubt some will claim its a false statement or a  lie, that's ok knock yourself out ,the article is out there somewhere.
ive tried the journal, lancet etc,but with  no luck.

back on track. here's dr naomi wolf.

https://rumble.com/v230kr0-one-of-five-stroke-sufferers-post-mrna-vaccine-died.-pfizer-documents.html

 

[Parklife]

9 minutes ago, red kelly said:

back on track. here's dr naomi wolf.
 

Haha. 

[red kelly]

8 minutes ago, Parklife said:

Haha. 

very good,you stick to netflex and the open book that is google, then  go back to sleep,safe and effective remember. , nothing to trigger you here. 
 

[Zeus]

Free Andy Tate 

[The Gee Man]

42 minutes ago, Zeus said:

Free Andy Tate 

Can’t imagine there is anything free about him. 

[The Gee Man]

3 hours ago, Bad_Mobby said:

Surely it’s Greta’s mum or dad coming up with the quips? 
 

 

Tbf seen them in an interview a few years back, I doubt it. 

[Zeus]

2 minutes ago, The Gee Man said:

Can’t imagine there is anything free about him. 

Taken down by the establishment iyam

[The Gee Man]

2 minutes ago, Zeus said:

Taken down by the establishment iyam

If it’s true should be put down

[Parklife]

6 hours ago, red kelly said:

very good,you stick to netflex and the open book that is google, then  go back to sleep,safe and effective remember. , nothing to trigger you here. 
 

"Dr Naomi Wolf"

😂😂

[Reed or deed]

6 hours ago, red kelly said:

very good,you stick to netflex and the open book that is google, then  go back to sleep,safe and effective remember. , nothing to trigger you here. 
 

U wot m8?

[Zeus]

23 minutes ago, The Gee Man said:

If it’s true should be put down

The establishment? I AGREE!

[The Gee Man]

4 minutes ago, Zeus said:

The establishment? I AGREE!

Very proletariat 

[Zeus]

Don't know what that means 

[Jocky Balboa]

On 12/29/2022 at 10:28 AM, Parklife said:

Like what? 

I was just showing how daft your anecdotal musings were. 

I've not known a single person who's had any issues after taking a jag. 

I made no definitive conclusion, only that for all who parrot the "safe and effective" line, I know personally of a few people who experienced anaphylactic shock and immune system problems respectively. Whether they are isolated cases, time will tell, hence my closing "as more data emerges..." comment, which you glossed over.

What does differentiate myself and many others like me, is our default position was one of scepticism; neither buying the official narrative verbatim, nor falling into hardline conspiracy theory (in such divisive issues, history usually finds truth somewhere in the middle). What I won't do, is unquestioningly put my faith in the company who paid the biggest criminal (yes CRIMINAL, not civil) fine in history, when they insist I take an experimental shot, with no long-term data. 

I also note the moving goalposts from mainstream media, politicians, Big Tech and Big Pharma et al.

- They started by saying vulnerable groups would be the focus, then the rest would weigh up the risks for themselves and make a choice based on INFORMED CONSENT (note the Nuremberg Code).

- When restrictions continued, long after the experimental shots were rolled out to all the vulnerable groups, was that not suspicious for the believers?

- Then they started to coerce and bully, threaten jobs and livelihoods, even excluding from parts of society, those who declined.

- Rather than debate and debunk those who challenged Fauci et al, they deplatformed them. That is NOT science, it is propaganda.

- Then when many jabbed still caught it, they said "it's a few breakthrough cases", nothing to see here.

- When jabbed continued to shed/transmit, they said "erm, well we didn't say it would stop you getting it... or spreading it!"

- Then they insisted people would need to keep boosting, as it wasn't that effective after all.

- Now they insist they never said the shots would eradicate the virus (in many cases, they damn well did!)

- Snivelling establishment arselickers like Piers Morgan backtrack and try to wriggle out of their previous authoritarian stance and they are getting away with it. 

[Don Fonte]

53 minutes ago, Jocky Balboa said:

I made no definitive conclusion, only that for all who parrot the "safe and effective" line, I know personally of a few people who experienced anaphylactic shock and immune system problems respectively. Whether they are isolated cases, time will tell, hence my closing "as more data emerges..." comment, which you glossed over.

What does differentiate myself and many others like me, is our default position was one of scepticism; neither buying the official narrative verbatim, nor falling into hardline conspiracy theory (in such divisive issues, history usually finds truth somewhere in the middle). What I won't do, is unquestioningly put my faith in the company who paid the biggest criminal (yes CRIMINAL, not civil) fine in history, when they insist I take an experimental shot, with no long-term data. 

I also note the moving goalposts from mainstream media, politicians, Big Tech and Big Pharma et al.

- They started by saying vulnerable groups would be the focus, then the rest would weigh up the risks for themselves and make a choice based on INFORMED CONSENT (note the Nuremberg Code).

- When restrictions continued, long after the experimental shots were rolled out to all the vulnerable groups, was that not suspicious for the believers?

- Then they started to coerce and bully, threaten jobs and livelihoods, even excluding from parts of society, those who declined.

- Rather than debate and debunk those who challenged Fauci et al, they deplatformed them. That is NOT science, it is propaganda.

- Then when many jabbed still caught it, they said "it's a few breakthrough cases", nothing to see here.

- When jabbed continued to shed/transmit, they said "erm, well we didn't say it would stop you getting it... or spreading it!"

- Then they insisted people would need to keep boosting, as it wasn't that effective after all.

- Now they insist they never said the shots would eradicate the virus (in many cases, they damn well did!)

- Snivelling establishment arselickers like Piers Morgan backtrack and try to wriggle out of their previous authoritarian stance and they are getting away with it. 

NRT