DeltaRay1903 Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 46 minutes ago, pittodriepie83 said: Negatives of it not being Michael O’Neil; It might be Neil Lennon It won't. He isn't in the running and never was. 1 Link to comment
TheRedPrawcess Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 Christ. If it has been offered to O'Neill and he's turned us down, then we've hounded the club for an update, complained about the weak content of the update and now we'll complain that actually it was lies. Unless ofcourse the back up is waiting in the wings with open arms. Lennon. It's going to be Lennon, isn't it? Link to comment
TheRedPrawcess Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 Could it also be that O'Neill has not been offered the job "yet'? We have identified him as main target, made that clear to him and his employer, but we're just not through the red tape to make an offer? I'm not on X so can't see find Burns posts or replies. Link to comment
KidCreole Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 1 hour ago, fine-n-dandy said: Aye but ‘the hat’ isn’t always the most reliable place for information Controversial Link to comment
mainstandmoan Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 It’s clear from social media posts that O’Neil has been ‘offered’ the post. Burns is getting nothing out of Pittodrie, the main reason being it changes by the hour as Cormack takes another thought tangent. Burns info is coming from O’Neil himself, making the Pittodrie silence pointless. AFC will have to stump up the full compensation to NI as well as match his 4 year contract on Derek wages. O’Neil has been a target since day 1, Tosh’s tweet is correct, came from Willie Garner who was doing the rounds post match with his corporate buddies and redtv pals. It’s all very delicate, defeat today and I’d imagine desperation will go a new level, I’m guessing that means O’Neil’s offer improves again, or the gamble may well turn to Lennon. The board don’t want to alienate a section of the fans with the Lennon gamble, particularly at season ticket time, however they know relegation brings a much bigger renewal issue. 1 1 1 Link to comment
The Gee Man Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 2 minutes ago, mainstandmoan said: It’s clear from social media posts that O’Neil has been ‘offered’ the post. Burns is getting nothing out of Pittodrie, the main reason being it changes by the hour as Cormack takes another thought tangent. Burns info is coming from O’Neil himself, making the Pittodrie silence pointless. AFC will have to stump up the full compensation to NI as well as match his 4 year contract on Derek wages. O’Neil has been a target since day 1, Tosh’s tweet is correct, came from Willie Garner who was doing the rounds post match with his corporate buddies and redtv pals. It’s all very delicate, defeat today and I’d imagine desperation will go a new level, I’m guessing that means O’Neil’s offer improves again, or the gamble may well turn to Lennon. The board don’t want to alienate a section of the fans with the Lennon gamble, particularly at season ticket time, however they know relegation brings a much bigger renewal issue. Where does it definitively say in a social media post from someone at AFC they asked O’Neil to be our next manager 1 1 Link to comment
pittodriepie83 Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 12 minutes ago, mainstandmoan said: It’s clear from social media posts that O’Neil has been ‘offered’ the post. Burns is getting nothing out of Pittodrie, the main reason being it changes by the hour as Cormack takes another thought tangent. Burns info is coming from O’Neil himself, making the Pittodrie silence pointless. AFC will have to stump up the full compensation to NI as well as match his 4 year contract on Derek wages. O’Neil has been a target since day 1, Tosh’s tweet is correct, came from Willie Garner who was doing the rounds post match with his corporate buddies and redtv pals. It’s all very delicate, defeat today and I’d imagine desperation will go a new level, I’m guessing that means O’Neil’s offer improves again, or the gamble may well turn to Lennon. The board don’t want to alienate a section of the fans with the Lennon gamble, particularly at season ticket time, however they know relegation brings a much bigger renewal issue. So it’s clear he’s been offered it but he’s also telling Scott Burns he isn’t even under consideration? 1 Link to comment
Sharpie Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 15 minutes ago, mainstandmoan said: It’s clear from social media posts that O’Neil has been ‘offered’ the post. Burns is getting nothing out of Pittodrie, the main reason being it changes by the hour as Cormack takes another thought tangent. Burns info is coming from O’Neil himself, making the Pittodrie silence pointless. AFC will have to stump up the full compensation to NI as well as match his 4 year contract on Derek wages. O’Neil has been a target since day 1, Tosh’s tweet is correct, came from Willie Garner who was doing the rounds post match with his corporate buddies and redtv pals. It’s all very delicate, defeat today and I’d imagine desperation will go a new level, I’m guessing that means O’Neil’s offer improves again, or the gamble may well turn to Lennon. The board don’t want to alienate a section of the fans with the Lennon gamble, particularly at season ticket time, however they know relegation brings a much bigger renewal issue. Cormack would have known the cost from the off so is he trying to get O'Neill to come for a pay cut? Link to comment
HaarDon Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 I'd take Lennon now. Don't give a fuck about his personality. He has mass experience. 4 Link to comment
Tord31 Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 22 minutes ago, mainstandmoan said: It’s clear from social media posts that O’Neil has been ‘offered’ the post. Burns is getting nothing out of Pittodrie, the main reason being it changes by the hour as Cormack takes another thought tangent. Burns info is coming from O’Neil himself, making the Pittodrie silence pointless. AFC will have to stump up the full compensation to NI as well as match his 4 year contract on Derek wages. O’Neil has been a target since day 1, Tosh’s tweet is correct, came from Willie Garner who was doing the rounds post match with his corporate buddies and redtv pals. It’s all very delicate, defeat today and I’d imagine desperation will go a new level, I’m guessing that means O’Neil’s offer improves again, or the gamble may well turn to Lennon. The board don’t want to alienate a section of the fans with the Lennon gamble, particularly at season ticket time, however they know relegation brings a much bigger renewal issue. so weve still nae fucking manager Link to comment
The Gee Man Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 7 minutes ago, pittodriepie83 said: So it’s clear he’s been offered it but he’s also telling Scott Burns he isn’t even under consideration? Surely that doesn’t make sense! It’s clear he’s been offered but isn’t under consideration? Two opposite statements . And still don’t see how it’s clear. Because people on here keep saying “they’ve been told! by someone “ 1 1 Link to comment
Sheeptastic Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 2 minutes ago, HaarDon said: I'd take Lennon now. Don't give a fuck about his personality. He has mass experience. Won the championship with Hibs. Exactly what we need. 3 Link to comment
milne_afc Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 24 minutes ago, mainstandmoan said: It’s clear from social media posts that O’Neil has been ‘offered’ the post. Burns is getting nothing out of Pittodrie, the main reason being it changes by the hour as Cormack takes another thought tangent. Burns info is coming from O’Neil himself, making the Pittodrie silence pointless. AFC will have to stump up the full compensation to NI as well as match his 4 year contract on Derek wages. O’Neil has been a target since day 1, Tosh’s tweet is correct, came from Willie Garner who was doing the rounds post match with his corporate buddies and redtv pals. It’s all very delicate, defeat today and I’d imagine desperation will go a new level, I’m guessing that means O’Neil’s offer improves again, or the gamble may well turn to Lennon. The board don’t want to alienate a section of the fans with the Lennon gamble, particularly at season ticket time, however they know relegation brings a much bigger renewal issue. Your posting style was much more relaxed and coy over on Ad Mad. 1 Link to comment
slippers Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 That’s sky confirming O’Neil is expected to stay despite intersect from us. As I say complete lies we weren’t interested from burns. Link to comment
HaarDon Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 4 minutes ago, Sheeptastic said: Won the championship with Hibs. Exactly what we need. He led them to promotion back to the Scottish Premiership in his first season as head coach, and European qualification in his second season, before leaving Hibernian in January 2019. Link to comment
brownie Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 Just save ourselves another 18 months of hassle and install Dave Cormack as manager. Link to comment
WesthillWanderersFC Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 9 minutes ago, HaarDon said: I'd take Lennon now. Don't give a fuck about his personality. He has mass experience. DYA Link to comment
Rico1903 Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 6 minutes ago, milne_afc said: Your posting style was much more relaxed and coy over on Ad Mad. I seem to recall some discussion around whether it was the same person Link to comment
HaarDon Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 2 minutes ago, WesthillWanderersFC said: DYA He's not my choice either but rn we are reeking of desperation and if nobody of any quality or experience is attainable then why not? Link to comment
The Gee Man Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 We need a new manager (Fact), but the only desperation is from people on here regurgitating the same speel every few hours. Hence 404 pages of repeat. We have a coaching team and players. They just need to do their jobs. 1 Link to comment
Millertime Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 7 hours ago, G31DON said: Igor Angelovski as head coach, Michael O'Neill part time DoF while continuing to manage NI. Don't shoot the messenger. Mcinnes still signing for "rangers" m8? 1 Link to comment
WesthillWanderersFC Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 7 minutes ago, HaarDon said: He's not my choice either but rn we are reeking of desperation and if nobody of any quality or experience is attainable then why not? Because he’s not a very good manager. And because he’s an abhorrent wee rat who will fall out with everyone fairly quickly. Link to comment
Red Clive 1995 Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 Can’t believe this thread is still going with absolute wet wipes creaming themselves over the next manager. 1 Link to comment
CrazyBullSheep Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 1 minute ago, Red Clive 1995 said: Can’t believe this thread is still going with absolute wet wipes creaming themselves over the next manager. Some laugh when Jack Ross gets unveiled next week Link to comment
RUL Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 Be interesting if O’Neill was the one burrows thought he had Thursday. 1 Link to comment
Rico1903 Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 Sky Sports News reporting that O’Neill is staying with NI. https://twitter.com/scotlandsky/status/1773980661646291330?s=46&t=Z_HLeZlJIrO3optaOoLy6Q Link to comment
aberdeen1970 Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 13 minutes ago, Red Clive 1995 said: Can’t believe this thread is still going with absolute wet wipes creaming themselves over the next manager. Some folk have over 500 posts on the matter, basically saying the same thing on repeat Link to comment
Ando Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 20 minutes ago, The Gee Man said: We need a new manager (Fact), but the only desperation is from people on here regurgitating the same speel every few hours. Hence 404 pages of repeat. We have a coaching team and players. They just need to do their jobs. 3 Link to comment
The Gee Man Posted March 30 Share Posted March 30 2 minutes ago, Ando said: Maybe refresh Link to comment
Recommended Posts